gipper08 wrote:GimmeDat wrote:This is the perspective of an outsider who liked both Tatum and Fultz before the draft - I liked the trade for both and I still like it now.
You still like it now!!!??? Wow.
First of all Fultz likely there at three with no trade.
Ainge was honest when he said he would take Taytum at one.
Whoever goes 4-5 in June are better prospects than peak prospect Fultz. The guys going 2-3 are tiers above peak prospect Fultz.
If Fultz was going to be there at 3 then why the hell did BC trade up for him?
Was there any truth to the rumor that the Lakers wanted Fultz?
Was there another team in the mix looking to move up for the chance to get the #1 pick and Fultz?
Did BC just think the Lakers were going to have a banner year followed by the Kings?
was BC just anxious to make a splash and put his stamp on this team that he made this move?
Did Ainge just do a Jedi mind trick on BC?
The only way BC makes this trade is if he truly believes that Fultz was not going to be there at 3.
He feels and felt that Fultz is the missing piece for our core of 3 and there was no one else available in this draft that can do what Fultz can do.
He looked at prospects coming out in future drafts and there was no one that was projected to be as good as Fultz going forward.
You want it to be one way....but it's the other way.
Marlo