1/3 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (133) - (96) Los Angeles Lakers

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

Player(s) of the Game

Paul George | 24 PTS (9-14 FG, 3-7 3P), 3 STL
1
3%
Carmelo Anthony | 21 PTS (8-14 FG, 3-5 3P), 6 REB
3
9%
Steven Adams | 12 PTS (6-10 FG), 6 REB, 3 BLK
0
No votes
Terrance Ferguson | 24 PTS (9-12 FG, 6-9 3P)
23
72%
Russell Westbrook | 20 PTS (10-17 FG), 6 REB, 12 AST
5
16%
Raymond Felton | 4 REB, 10 AST
0
No votes
Josh Huestis | 4 PTS (2-4 FG), 9 REB, 2 BLK
0
No votes
Daniel Hamilton | 7 PTS (3-4 FG), 4 AST
0
No votes
Other (specify below)
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 32

User avatar
Funcrusher
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,084
And1: 6,569
Joined: Apr 14, 2017
Location: Stolen from Africa
     

Re: 1/3 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (133) - (96) Los Angeles Lakers 

Post#41 » by Funcrusher » Thu Jan 4, 2018 6:08 pm

getrichordie wrote:
Bergmaniac wrote:
getrichordie wrote:I just want to take a moment and talk about how low-key good Huestis has been. I’ve been calling on him to get minutes since the season before last. The thing that he brings to our team that helps a lot is his switch-ability. He’s a really solid defender who can switch on 2s through 5s and do a good job. And he can hit the open 3. That’s huge.

He is shooting 31.7% from 3 even though nearly all of his shots are open and most are wide open. That's not good. He's better than Roberson and Grant at this, but that's a very low bar.


Yeah and Ferguson is shooting ~25% on threes for the season. Huestis is essentially a rookie and sure 31% isn’t great. But the consistency will come. The fact that a defender has to respect Huestis at the perimeter is a huge when you pair that with his defensive contributions.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app

He's only averaged 8 minutes per game. And I don't really think a defender has to respect Huestis at the perimeter all that much.
gh123 wrote:Zion lucky if he gets 18 ppg on decent efficiency. Midget big man is a no-career in NBA. Chuck being the only wonder. Zion is the next Tractor Trailer at best.
Bergmaniac
Head Coach
Posts: 7,464
And1: 11,224
Joined: Jan 08, 2010
 

Re: 1/3 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (133) - (96) Los Angeles Lakers 

Post#42 » by Bergmaniac » Thu Jan 4, 2018 6:13 pm

getrichordie wrote:
Bergmaniac wrote:
getrichordie wrote:I just want to take a moment and talk about how low-key good Huestis has been. I’ve been calling on him to get minutes since the season before last. The thing that he brings to our team that helps a lot is his switch-ability. He’s a really solid defender who can switch on 2s through 5s and do a good job. And he can hit the open 3. That’s huge.

He is shooting 31.7% from 3 even though nearly all of his shots are open and most are wide open. That's not good. He's better than Roberson and Grant at this, but that's a very low bar.


Yeah and Ferguson is shooting ~25% on threes for the season. Huestis is essentially a rookie and sure 31% isn’t great. But the consistency will come. The fact that a defender has to respect Huestis at the perimeter is a huge when you pair that with his defensive contributions.

But defenders don't respects Huestis shot. They help off him all the time, not as much as with Roberson, but still pretty blatantly. Most of his 3s are wide open.
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,759
And1: 48,729
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: 1/3 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (133) - (96) Los Angeles Lakers 

Post#43 » by dakomish23 » Thu Jan 4, 2018 6:59 pm

Leadership

Read on Twitter
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
sleestak33
Junior
Posts: 388
And1: 150
Joined: Mar 17, 2017
   

Re: 1/3 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (133) - (96) Los Angeles Lakers 

Post#44 » by sleestak33 » Thu Jan 4, 2018 10:30 pm

bbms wrote:Hope Ferguson is not another Jeremy Lamb. Nice performance out there. Huestis +30.


Enviado do meu iPhone usando RealGM Forums


Ummmm....perhaps you're not paying attention. Lamb this year is averaging 15 points 5 rebounds and 3 assists shooting 36% on 3s and 86% on free throws. It's not Lamb's fault Presti foolishly picked Roberson over him. It was a stupid mistake.
sleestak33
Junior
Posts: 388
And1: 150
Joined: Mar 17, 2017
   

Re: 1/3 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (133) - (96) Los Angeles Lakers 

Post#45 » by sleestak33 » Thu Jan 4, 2018 10:36 pm

It's funny the reactions of people on here who act as if 24 points from a starting shooting guard in the NBA is some sort of monumental achievement. With the looks the starting 2 gets in this offense this kind of game should happen plenty of times throughout the year.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 1/3 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (133) - (96) Los Angeles Lakers 

Post#46 » by bondom34 » Thu Jan 4, 2018 11:53 pm

And yet, Lamb's team is firmly worse than OKC and he's not as good a player. Bizarre that multiple franchises seem to agree on that.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,340
And1: 19,166
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 1/3 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (133) - (96) Los Angeles Lakers 

Post#47 » by ThunderBolt » Fri Jan 5, 2018 12:10 am

sleestak33 wrote:It's funny the reactions of people on here who act as if 24 points from a starting shooting guard in the NBA is some sort of monumental achievement. With the looks the starting 2 gets in this offense this kind of game should happen plenty of times throughout the year.


I dont know if you have a time limit on how long your parents let you use your kindle fire ,but there was an interesting stat about his performance you might not have seen. Only Ferguson and Durant have had such high scoring performances as teenage rookies for the thunder in their first start. Therefore it’s monumnetal.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
Funcrusher
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,084
And1: 6,569
Joined: Apr 14, 2017
Location: Stolen from Africa
     

Re: 1/3 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (133) - (96) Los Angeles Lakers 

Post#48 » by Funcrusher » Fri Jan 5, 2018 12:15 am

Knrstz wrote:
sleestak33 wrote:It's funny the reactions of people on here who act as if 24 points from a starting shooting guard in the NBA is some sort of monumental achievement. With the looks the starting 2 gets in this offense this kind of game should happen plenty of times throughout the year.


I dont know if you have a time limit on how long your parents let you use your kindle fire ,but there was an interesting stat about his performance you might not have seen. Only Ferguson and Durant have had such high scoring performances as teenage rookies for the thunder. Therefore it’s monumnetal.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
gh123 wrote:Zion lucky if he gets 18 ppg on decent efficiency. Midget big man is a no-career in NBA. Chuck being the only wonder. Zion is the next Tractor Trailer at best.
sleestak33
Junior
Posts: 388
And1: 150
Joined: Mar 17, 2017
   

Re: 1/3 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (133) - (96) Los Angeles Lakers 

Post#49 » by sleestak33 » Fri Jan 5, 2018 1:27 pm

bondom34 wrote:And yet, Lamb's team is firmly worse than OKC and he's not as good a player. Bizarre that multiple franchises seem to agree on that.


Are you kidding me? Are you seriously trying to say that Roberson is a better player than Lamb? That might be one of the funniest things I've ever heard in my life. Roberson is better than Lamb in one facet of basketball and that's defense. Lamb is a better ball handler, better scorer, better passer (basically anything whatsoever that has to do with offense) and he actually averages more rebounds per minute than Roberson so he beats him there as well. Keep in mind also that it's easy to play the defense Roberson does when he expends no energy on offense. Anybody would be great if they just stood in the corner on every offensive possession and did nothing like Roberson does. Lamb is UNQUESTIONABLY a superior player to Roberson and it's not even close. As far as Charlotte's team the success or lack of success they're having isn't because Lamb is playing bad or is a bad player. They just don't have the talent OKC does.
sleestak33
Junior
Posts: 388
And1: 150
Joined: Mar 17, 2017
   

Re: 1/3 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (133) - (96) Los Angeles Lakers 

Post#50 » by sleestak33 » Fri Jan 5, 2018 1:30 pm

BobThunder wrote:
Knrstz wrote:
sleestak33 wrote:It's funny the reactions of people on here who act as if 24 points from a starting shooting guard in the NBA is some sort of monumental achievement. With the looks the starting 2 gets in this offense this kind of game should happen plenty of times throughout the year.


I dont know if you have a time limit on how long your parents let you use your kindle fire ,but there was an interesting stat about his performance you might not have seen. Only Ferguson and Durant have had such high scoring performances as teenage rookies for the thunder. Therefore it’s monumnetal.

:lol: :lol: :lol:


I could care less if he's 16. A starting shooting guard in the NBA who is competent offensively is going to score than many points quite a few times throughout the regular season. It's just that you all have been watching Roberson for so long that you think 24 points is like scoring 50 or some sort of career game. Not every shooting guard sucks like Roberson does. OKC has cornered the market on starting shooting guards that can't score with Thabo and Roberson. They're pretty much the only team that thinks it's a great idea.
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,541
And1: 6,787
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: 1/3 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (133) - (96) Los Angeles Lakers 

Post#51 » by slick_watts » Fri Jan 5, 2018 1:48 pm

sleestak33 wrote:Lamb is UNQUESTIONABLY a superior player to Roberson and it's not even close.


you have no idea how to quantify defensive impact, and nobody that does could ever have this opinion.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: 1/3 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (133) - (96) Los Angeles Lakers 

Post#52 » by spearsy23 » Fri Jan 5, 2018 2:25 pm

Clear travel on the windmill
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 1/3 - POSTGAME | Oklahoma City Thunder (133) - (96) Los Angeles Lakers 

Post#53 » by bondom34 » Fri Jan 5, 2018 2:27 pm

sleestak33 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:And yet, Lamb's team is firmly worse than OKC and he's not as good a player. Bizarre that multiple franchises seem to agree on that.


Are you kidding me? Are you seriously trying to say that Roberson is a better player than Lamb? That might be one of the funniest things I've ever heard in my life. Roberson is better than Lamb in one facet of basketball and that's defense. Lamb is a better ball handler, better scorer, better passer (basically anything whatsoever that has to do with offense) and he actually averages more rebounds per minute than Roberson so he beats him there as well. Keep in mind also that it's easy to play the defense Roberson does when he expends no energy on offense. Anybody would be great if they just stood in the corner on every offensive possession and did nothing like Roberson does. Lamb is UNQUESTIONABLY a superior player to Roberson and it's not even close. As far as Charlotte's team the success or lack of success they're having isn't because Lamb is playing bad or is a bad player. They just don't have the talent OKC does.

Yes.

And actually you claiming Lamb superior is quite funny to everyone else.

Theres a reason everyone says the same thing to you on every site you spam Roberson posts on. Maybe at some point you should really question your beliefs since apparently the real world already does.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder