mlloyd10 wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:mlloyd10 wrote:
I'd rather have a $1 than two 50 cent pieces
I'd rather have four potential $1 pieces than one $1.
Thats a stretch -
I mean, you're the one who simplified it in the first place.
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation
mlloyd10 wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:mlloyd10 wrote:
I'd rather have a $1 than two 50 cent pieces
I'd rather have four potential $1 pieces than one $1.
Thats a stretch -
ReasonablySober wrote:mlloyd10 wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:
I'd rather have four potential $1 pieces than one $1.
Thats a stretch -
I mean, you're the one who simplified it in the first place.
mlloyd10 wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:mlloyd10 wrote:
Thats a stretch -
I mean, you're the one who simplified it in the first place.
A. You get a legit young star - Yelich
B. You hope that Ray, Harrison or Grisham hope to be
Outlander wrote:Yelich makes plenty sense,
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
trwi7 wrote:Outlander wrote:Yelich makes plenty sense,
He makes literally no sense given our organizational strength and the cost of acquisition.
Tfence92 wrote:trwi7 wrote:Outlander wrote:Yelich makes plenty sense,
He makes literally no sense given our organizational strength and the cost of acquisition.
Is Yelich not what we want/are expecting out of Ray/Brinson/Phillips in a few years?
We are far from any window closing (it's not even open yet), but Yelich is literally what we hope one of those three guys can become. I'm not sure that any of their ceilings are that much higher than Yelich right now; and he's only 2.5/3 years older than those three.
Iheartfootball wrote:Tfence92 wrote:trwi7 wrote:
He makes literally no sense given our organizational strength and the cost of acquisition.
Is Yelich not what we want/are expecting out of Ray/Brinson/Phillips in a few years?
We are far from any window closing (it's not even open yet), but Yelich is literally what we hope one of those three guys can become. I'm not sure that any of their ceilings are that much higher than Yelich right now; and he's only 2.5/3 years older than those three.
Is that exactly why we don't need him?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
trwi7 wrote:We already have Braun and Santana and Yelich is a **** defender in CF. So we're not "hoping" on anyone. Braun is here for the duration of his contract and isn't losing his spot and the upgrade on Santana is minimal and a net negative overall when considering the asset cost of trading for him.
So once again, why the **** are we talking about Yelich?
Tfence92 wrote:trwi7 wrote:We already have Braun and Santana and Yelich is a **** defender in CF. So we're not "hoping" on anyone. Braun is here for the duration of his contract and isn't losing his spot and the upgrade on Santana is minimal and a net negative overall when considering the asset cost of trading for him.
So once again, why the **** are we talking about Yelich?
Sorry for talking about trying to acquire all star caliber 25 year olds.
Tfence92 wrote:How do we still have Wren?
How has no one given him a shot lol.
Kerb Hohl wrote:Tfence92 wrote:How do we still have Wren?
How has no one given him a shot lol.
Because he’s a local media/message board inflated player with an inflated Colorado Springs batting average. Might be something but if it was likely, someone else would’ve scooped him up.