ImageImageImage

Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion)

Moderators: BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

Kobblehead
RealGM
Posts: 40,844
And1: 20,001
Joined: Apr 15, 2010
 

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1901 » by Kobblehead » Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:15 pm

Fultz switched to Diet Coke. Maybe Justin Anderson can get him to come around on seltzer water.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,522
And1: 17,079
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1902 » by Negrodamus » Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:25 pm

gdog2004 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
gdog2004 wrote:The worst guard on the Sixers can swish open shots in practice with no one guarding. Fultz isnt going to play this year I feel. With no ability to shoot he doesnt deserve to be on the floor.


What about Simmons? Rondo? These guys don’t shoot threes and are very effective. I feel like it’s foolish to sit him all year because he’s struggling with one aspect of his game.


Simmons -6-10 245 lb beast who can pass, defend, rebound and drive to the basket at a very high level. He can affect the game without shooting.
Rondo--lightning quick lockdown defender who can also affect the game without shooting.

Fultz doesnt have the size or defensive ability yet. He probably isn't even drafted if he didn't show an ability to shoot from all ranges. And right now, he cant shoot. Its not just 3 pointers...HE. CANT. SHOOT...FROM ANYWHERE. He needs to sit out the year.
Maybe next year he comes back strong, if not Sixer fans may just have to deal with the reality that BC blew two prime assets for nothing.


My point is that being a knockdown shooter isn't a requisite to being productive from a guard. If Fultz can hit inside the arch and put pressure on the defense by beating his man, or running the PnR (which he was one of the best in the country last year at doing), then you let him play.

Here's a little surprise: Fultz's best attribute wasn't his ability to shoot. It was his ability to react to what the defense was giving him and make a great play. Our team desperately needs this now more than ever from our guards; not another shooter.
gdog2004
Starter
Posts: 2,183
And1: 706
Joined: Jun 01, 2014
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1903 » by gdog2004 » Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:32 pm

Negrodamus wrote:
gdog2004 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
What about Simmons? Rondo? These guys don’t shoot threes and are very effective. I feel like it’s foolish to sit him all year because he’s struggling with one aspect of his game.


Simmons -6-10 245 lb beast who can pass, defend, rebound and drive to the basket at a very high level. He can affect the game without shooting.
Rondo--lightning quick lockdown defender who can also affect the game without shooting.

Fultz doesnt have the size or defensive ability yet. He probably isn't even drafted if he didn't show an ability to shoot from all ranges. And right now, he cant shoot. Its not just 3 pointers...HE. CANT. SHOOT...FROM ANYWHERE. He needs to sit out the year.
Maybe next year he comes back strong, if not Sixer fans may just have to deal with the reality that BC blew two prime assets for nothing.


My point is that being a knockdown shooter isn't a requisite to being productive from a guard. If Fultz can hit inside the arch and put pressure on the defense by beating his man, or running the PnR (which he was one of the best in the country last year at doing), then you let him play.

Here's a little surprise: Fultz's best attribute wasn't his ability to shoot. It was his ability to react to what the defense was giving him and make a great play. Our team desperately needs this now more than ever from our guards; not another shooter.


You have to be able to shoot a little. He is missing wide open 10 footers with no one covering him. He cant shoot at a high school level at this point. If he cant shoot the defense will give him NOTHING other than backing off him and clogging the lane. Fultz isnt even drafted the way he plays now.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,522
And1: 17,079
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1904 » by Negrodamus » Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:38 pm

gdog2004 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
gdog2004 wrote:
Simmons -6-10 245 lb beast who can pass, defend, rebound and drive to the basket at a very high level. He can affect the game without shooting.
Rondo--lightning quick lockdown defender who can also affect the game without shooting.

Fultz doesnt have the size or defensive ability yet. He probably isn't even drafted if he didn't show an ability to shoot from all ranges. And right now, he cant shoot. Its not just 3 pointers...HE. CANT. SHOOT...FROM ANYWHERE. He needs to sit out the year.
Maybe next year he comes back strong, if not Sixer fans may just have to deal with the reality that BC blew two prime assets for nothing.


My point is that being a knockdown shooter isn't a requisite to being productive from a guard. If Fultz can hit inside the arch and put pressure on the defense by beating his man, or running the PnR (which he was one of the best in the country last year at doing), then you let him play.

Here's a little surprise: Fultz's best attribute wasn't his ability to shoot. It was his ability to react to what the defense was giving him and make a great play. Our team desperately needs this now more than ever from our guards; not another shooter.


You have to be able to shoot a little. He is missing wide open 10 footers with no one covering him. He cant shoot at a high school level at this point. If he cant shoot the defense will give him NOTHING other than backing off him and clogging the lane. Fultz isnt even drafted the way he plays now.


But he doesn't have to shoot a little. If he can hit free throws, then it's not important for him to be shooting right now. It is also more important for his development to at least play 10-15 minutes a game to get a better feel on NBA in game flow.

I know a lot of posters here have given up on Fultz this year (and possibly beyond), but in terms of developing him, letting him sit for the rest of the year when he's healthy enough to contribute would be a disservice to his development.
mithrandir17
Veteran
Posts: 2,907
And1: 1,675
Joined: Jan 30, 2017
 

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1905 » by mithrandir17 » Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:38 pm

gdog2004 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
gdog2004 wrote:
Simmons -6-10 245 lb beast who can pass, defend, rebound and drive to the basket at a very high level. He can affect the game without shooting.
Rondo--lightning quick lockdown defender who can also affect the game without shooting.

Fultz doesnt have the size or defensive ability yet. He probably isn't even drafted if he didn't show an ability to shoot from all ranges. And right now, he cant shoot. Its not just 3 pointers...HE. CANT. SHOOT...FROM ANYWHERE. He needs to sit out the year.
Maybe next year he comes back strong, if not Sixer fans may just have to deal with the reality that BC blew two prime assets for nothing.


My point is that being a knockdown shooter isn't a requisite to being productive from a guard. If Fultz can hit inside the arch and put pressure on the defense by beating his man, or running the PnR (which he was one of the best in the country last year at doing), then you let him play.

Here's a little surprise: Fultz's best attribute wasn't his ability to shoot. It was his ability to react to what the defense was giving him and make a great play. Our team desperately needs this now more than ever from our guards; not another shooter.


You have to be able to shoot a little. He is missing wide open 10 footers with no one covering him. He cant shoot at a high school level at this point. If he cant shoot the defense will give him NOTHING other than backing off him and clogging the lane. Fultz isnt even drafted the way he plays now.

Are we watching the same practice videos or not? Fultz is making his pull up jumpers inside the arc and also his FT shot looks fine.
gdog2004
Starter
Posts: 2,183
And1: 706
Joined: Jun 01, 2014
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1906 » by gdog2004 » Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:58 pm

mithrandir17 wrote:
gdog2004 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
My point is that being a knockdown shooter isn't a requisite to being productive from a guard. If Fultz can hit inside the arch and put pressure on the defense by beating his man, or running the PnR (which he was one of the best in the country last year at doing), then you let him play.

Here's a little surprise: Fultz's best attribute wasn't his ability to shoot. It was his ability to react to what the defense was giving him and make a great play. Our team desperately needs this now more than ever from our guards; not another shooter.


You have to be able to shoot a little. He is missing wide open 10 footers with no one covering him. He cant shoot at a high school level at this point. If he cant shoot the defense will give him NOTHING other than backing off him and clogging the lane. Fultz isnt even drafted the way he plays now.

Are we watching the same practice videos or not? Fultz is making his pull up jumpers inside the arc and also his FT shot looks fine.

He is missing shots left and right in those videos. I am sure if he were ready, they would play him. He's not ready to be an NBA player right now.
phillthy13
Sophomore
Posts: 244
And1: 57
Joined: Apr 24, 2014
         

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1907 » by phillthy13 » Mon Jan 22, 2018 5:08 pm

Negrodamus wrote:
gdog2004 wrote:The worst guard on the Sixers can swish open shots in practice with no one guarding. Fultz isnt going to play this year I feel. With no ability to shoot he doesnt deserve to be on the floor.


What about Simmons? Rondo? These guys don’t shoot threes and are very effective. I feel like it’s foolish to sit him all year because he’s struggling with one aspect of his game.


Biggest aspect of his game IMO - BC traded for him because he was a scoring/shooting point guard team's die for. If we wanted a non-scoring/shooting point guard, we would've took Tatum at 3 and found that guy elsewhere.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,522
And1: 17,079
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1908 » by Negrodamus » Mon Jan 22, 2018 5:18 pm

phillthy13 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
gdog2004 wrote:The worst guard on the Sixers can swish open shots in practice with no one guarding. Fultz isnt going to play this year I feel. With no ability to shoot he doesnt deserve to be on the floor.


What about Simmons? Rondo? These guys don’t shoot threes and are very effective. I feel like it’s foolish to sit him all year because he’s struggling with one aspect of his game.


Biggest aspect of his game IMO - BC traded for him because he was a scoring/shooting point guard team's die for. If we wanted a non-scoring/shooting point guard, we would've took Tatum at 3 and found that guy elsewhere.


Yea, without getting too much into this because it's not the thread for it, but I never thought of Fultz as a scoring guard (or a shooter for that matter), so I never understood the trade up. If we wanted a scorer, I agree, we should have drafted Tatum or Donovan Mitchell. Fultz was thrusted into a role of needing to score due to an anemic offense. The fact that he was able to score so much was a bonus. His passing and running the PnR is what made him a stellar prospect (along with his height, wingspan, intangible stuff).
gdog2004
Starter
Posts: 2,183
And1: 706
Joined: Jun 01, 2014
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1909 » by gdog2004 » Mon Jan 22, 2018 10:00 pm

mithrandir17 wrote:
gdog2004 wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
My point is that being a knockdown shooter isn't a requisite to being productive from a guard. If Fultz can hit inside the arch and put pressure on the defense by beating his man, or running the PnR (which he was one of the best in the country last year at doing), then you let him play.

Here's a little surprise: Fultz's best attribute wasn't his ability to shoot. It was his ability to react to what the defense was giving him and make a great play. Our team desperately needs this now more than ever from our guards; not another shooter.


You have to be able to shoot a little. He is missing wide open 10 footers with no one covering him. He cant shoot at a high school level at this point. If he cant shoot the defense will give him NOTHING other than backing off him and clogging the lane. Fultz isnt even drafted the way he plays now.

Are we watching the same practice videos or not? Fultz is making his pull up jumpers inside the arc and also his FT shot looks fine.

He made like one of 3 of those inside the arc jumpers and even that wasn't clean. Then they switched to FT's and what did he shoot s 30% ? Really bad missed on those FT's too. If you think that is good...I cant help you. He shoots like that he is never going to play.
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,946
And1: 16,327
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1910 » by Sixerscan » Mon Jan 22, 2018 10:03 pm

gdog2004 wrote:
mithrandir17 wrote:
gdog2004 wrote:
You have to be able to shoot a little. He is missing wide open 10 footers with no one covering him. He cant shoot at a high school level at this point. If he cant shoot the defense will give him NOTHING other than backing off him and clogging the lane. Fultz isnt even drafted the way he plays now.

Are we watching the same practice videos or not? Fultz is making his pull up jumpers inside the arc and also his FT shot looks fine.

He made like one of 3 of those inside the arc jumpers and even that wasn't clean. Then they switched to FT's and what did he shoot s 30% ? Really bad missed on those FT's too. If you think that is good...I cant help you. He shoots like that he is never going to play.


Maybe they're not deciding whether he plays based on a minute long video shot with an iPhone camera 50 feet away
gdog2004
Starter
Posts: 2,183
And1: 706
Joined: Jun 01, 2014
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1911 » by gdog2004 » Mon Jan 22, 2018 11:32 pm

Sixerscan wrote:
gdog2004 wrote:
mithrandir17 wrote:Are we watching the same practice videos or not? Fultz is making his pull up jumpers inside the arc and also his FT shot looks fine.

He made like one of 3 of those inside the arc jumpers and even that wasn't clean. Then they switched to FT's and what did he shoot s 30% ? Really bad missed on those FT's too. If you think that is good...I cant help you. He shoots like that he is never going to play.


Maybe they're not deciding whether he plays based on a minute long video shot with an iPhone camera 50 feet away

Your right, what's not captured on video may be even worse. Which is why he isn't playing. He's been deemed healthy for almost a month and hasn't suited up once. Once he learns to "shoot a basketball again" as his own coach says, then perhaps he can play.
It's a sad situation.
ExplosionsInDaSky
RealGM
Posts: 21,292
And1: 5,429
Joined: Mar 17, 2004

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1912 » by ExplosionsInDaSky » Mon Jan 22, 2018 11:47 pm

gdog2004 wrote:
Sixerscan wrote:
gdog2004 wrote:He made like one of 3 of those inside the arc jumpers and even that wasn't clean. Then they switched to FT's and what did he shoot s 30% ? Really bad missed on those FT's too. If you think that is good...I cant help you. He shoots like that he is never going to play.


Maybe they're not deciding whether he plays based on a minute long video shot with an iPhone camera 50 feet away

Your right, what's not captured on video may be even worse. Which is why he isn't playing. He's been deemed healthy for almost a month and hasn't suited up once. Once he learns to "shoot a basketball again" as his own coach says, then perhaps he can play.
It's a sad situation.


You sound extremely angry about this Fultz situation. How would you rate your anger on a scale of 1-10? I for one am furious and would like my league pass money back. The real Markelle Fultz is missing. This guy that took his place is merely his doppelganger who he met over in Brazil. Very similar to the movie Bubba Ho-Tep where the real Elvis is still alive in a nursing home.
User avatar
JojoSlimbiid
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,317
And1: 2,239
Joined: Dec 03, 2016
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1913 » by JojoSlimbiid » Tue Jan 23, 2018 12:00 am

Fultz didn't make the trip to Memphis. That's interesting.
Simmons25
Analyst
Posts: 3,166
And1: 2,235
Joined: Sep 27, 2016

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1915 » by Simmons25 » Tue Jan 23, 2018 1:02 am

Quite honestly if 6 foot 1 T J McConnell could play the last few seasons with absolutely no jump shot (prior to this season) and get decent game time then there is no reason 6 foot 4 Markelle Fultz should be "red shirted". He seems to be able to hit short jumpers and still have the speed and skill to get to the rim... and still has length to be a very good defensive player.
User avatar
bryanwithawhy
Pro Prospect
Posts: 944
And1: 581
Joined: Jun 23, 2010

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1916 » by bryanwithawhy » Tue Jan 23, 2018 2:15 am

Simmons25 wrote:Quite honestly if 6 foot 1 T J McConnell could play the last few seasons with absolutely no jump shot (prior to this season) and get decent game time then there is no reason 6 foot 4 Markelle Fultz should be "red shirted". He seems to be able to hit short jumpers and still have the speed and skill to get to the rim... and still has length to be a very good defensive player.


He would be fine playing this year -- the concern isn't whether he would hurt the team -- it's whether playing this year with a jacked jumpshot will hurt his confidence for future seasons.
Jeff Bezos says that if Amazon has a good quarter it’s because of work they did 3, 4, 5 years ago—not
because they did a good job that quarter.
User avatar
Grits n Gravy
General Manager
Posts: 9,627
And1: 1,804
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1917 » by Grits n Gravy » Tue Jan 23, 2018 10:00 am



Just watched this and what I hadn't noticed that is pointed out in the video is Fultz's body language after every miss - dropping head, no energy or enthusiasm, seeming borderline embarrassed.

The whole situation is one of the more puzzling I can remember. I didn't see much of him in college but loved what I saw and didn't doubt much if anything about his physical tools or skill set. Surely you don't just forget how to shoot a basketball? He must still be injured or suffering from the effects of an injury which makes the fact that he is practicing in contact situations strange to say the least.

You guys should get a 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th opinion from doctors/specialists and go from there. If found nothing wrong physically then a LEGIT shooting coach and personal trainer as well as maybe a sports psychologist and just sit the rest of the season out.
Kolkmania
Analyst
Posts: 3,463
And1: 1,737
Joined: Feb 11, 2015

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1918 » by Kolkmania » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:32 am

Grits n Gravy wrote:

Just watched this and what I hadn't noticed that is pointed out in the video is Fultz's body language after every miss - dropping head, no energy or enthusiasm, seeming borderline embarrassed.

The whole situation is one of the more puzzling I can remember. I didn't see much of him in college but loved what I saw and didn't doubt much if anything about his physical tools or skill set. Surely you don't just forget how to shoot a basketball? He must still be injured or suffering from the effects of an injury which makes the fact that he is practicing in contact situations strange to say the least.

You guys should get a 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th opinion from doctors/specialists and go from there. If found nothing wrong physically then a LEGIT shooting coach and personal trainer as well as maybe a sports psychologist and just sit the rest of the season out.


The body language thing is something that Fultz has had his entire life imo. Doesn't mean that he doesn't need to improve it eventually, especially if he wants to lead by example in the future, but I don't think it's related in this case.

However the video does point out a few things that frustrates us as fans.

1. We were under the assumption that Fultz shoulder was fully healed after month(s) of physiotherapy. However Brett Brown recently stated that he's still feeling some discomfort. If that's the case, why on earth is he allowed to shoot and create bad muscle memory?

2. How is Fultz even allowed to shoot like this? When you're this invested in a prospect you take every step to assure he regains his shooting confidence and fluidity he had before. If that means he doesn't play a single minute this year, I'm completely fine with that.
Everybody here acknowledges that this current motion will hinder him when/if he steps on the court, so why wouldn't the coaches interfere? So either they're happy with the progress he's making or they don't think it's important right now and they're focusing on the midrange stuff which does show some potential.

It's just the weirdest situation ever and a very, very bad look for the Sixers staff and organization imo.
User avatar
BigSleep333
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,718
And1: 1,632
Joined: Dec 30, 2011
   

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1919 » by BigSleep333 » Tue Jan 23, 2018 12:31 pm

i dont give a **** about fultz' confidence no more. half of the season is over and he still isnt on the court because he however forgot how to shoot. **** that injury. there is no injury. BC needs to get fired for this huge waste of prime assets. throw fultz in there and let him prove himself...im way beyond frustrated
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,839
And1: 11,656
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Markelle Fultz Discussion III: For Fultz and going forward (see 2017 draft thread for trade discussion) 

Post#1920 » by LloydFree » Tue Jan 23, 2018 12:54 pm

BigSleep333 wrote:i dont give a **** about fultz' confidence no more. half of the season is over and he still isnt on the court because he however forgot how to shoot. **** that injury. there is no injury. BC needs to get fired for this huge waste of prime assets. throw fultz in there and let him prove himself...im way beyond frustrated

BC needs to be fired and there is no injury, but there is no frustration with Fultz or his progress, only anxiety about what BC will mess up next.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down

Return to Philadelphia 76ers