Mikal Bridges

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831

916fan
Pro Prospect
Posts: 815
And1: 366
Joined: Dec 03, 2016
 

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#81 » by 916fan » Wed Jan 24, 2018 10:23 pm

vincecarter4pres wrote:
916fan wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:Now watching him for the 4th time. Not having a great game shooting, but still contributing. Maybe Danny Granger as a ceiling?

Healthy Danny Granger was a 20ppg scorer. That's too high of a ceiling.

I'm talking ceiling though. He winds up in the best possible situation, he works his ass off for years, he stays healthy. And then maybe he winds up like Granger.

Granger at New Mexico was the lead man, aggressive. But in the NBA he almost became that out of necessity and circumstances. Tbh, he probably would have been best as a 17 to 20ppg 2nd, or even 3rd option.

I think stylistically, they have a fair share of similarities.

oops I have no clue why, but I was mixing up ceiling with floor.
doordoor123
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,776
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2013

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#82 » by doordoor123 » Thu Jan 25, 2018 4:08 am

916fan wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:
916fan wrote:Healthy Danny Granger was a 20ppg scorer. That's too high of a ceiling.

I'm talking ceiling though. He winds up in the best possible situation, he works his ass off for years, he stays healthy. And then maybe he winds up like Granger.

Granger at New Mexico was the lead man, aggressive. But in the NBA he almost became that out of necessity and circumstances. Tbh, he probably would have been best as a 17 to 20ppg 2nd, or even 3rd option.

I think stylistically, they have a fair share of similarities.

oops I have no clue why, but I was mixing up ceiling with floor.


Found the bat.
MotownMadness
RealGM
Posts: 38,859
And1: 22,922
Joined: Oct 08, 2013
   

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#83 » by MotownMadness » Thu Jan 25, 2018 2:28 pm

Loving this guy
Nazrmohamed
Head Coach
Posts: 6,179
And1: 3,129
Joined: May 16, 2013
     

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#84 » by Nazrmohamed » Fri Jan 26, 2018 12:26 pm

RipCity71252 wrote:He's a lock to me to be a 16% or lower usage guy on offense and has some strength concerns that may limit his versatility defensively. Still really good on that end though.

Valuable supporting piece on a high level team which in most drafts is top 10 value, but guys with his offensive projection are almost always underdrafted as teams at the top are looking more for 1st and 2nd option guys.


Agree, however with time I think he has a decent frame to put on muscle. Probably you'd see it a all come together in year 3.

I'd love him as a 3 in NY.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,070
And1: 3,844
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#85 » by vincecarter4pres » Fri Jan 26, 2018 12:34 pm

Jeff Green or Harrison Barnes probably aren't the worst comparisons either.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
KqWIN
RealGM
Posts: 15,520
And1: 6,361
Joined: May 15, 2014
 

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#86 » by KqWIN » Tue Jan 30, 2018 3:04 am

Why do people keep comparing Mikal to NBA guys that are pullup, mid range jump shooters?
User avatar
Rafly
Starter
Posts: 2,437
And1: 10,501
Joined: Dec 28, 2016
 

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#87 » by Rafly » Tue Jan 30, 2018 4:53 am

Really I think he’s Otto Porter like.
RipCity71252
Pro Prospect
Posts: 839
And1: 221
Joined: Jul 19, 2008
Location: Just South of Rip City

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#88 » by RipCity71252 » Tue Feb 6, 2018 7:14 pm

Thabo Sefolosha with a worse handle but better shooting.
8305
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,494
And1: 639
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
     

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#89 » by 8305 » Fri Feb 9, 2018 11:13 am

916fan wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:Now watching him for the 4th time. Not having a great game shooting, but still contributing. Maybe Danny Granger as a ceiling?

Healthy Danny Granger was a 20ppg scorer. That's too high of a ceiling.


Granger was the classic high usage guy on bad to mediocre teams. Bridges is a more explosive athlete, better suited to be a true lock down defender than Granger. Physically he reminds of Ande Iguadala. Better shooter lesser ball handler.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#90 » by Ruzious » Fri Feb 9, 2018 4:14 pm

8305 wrote:
916fan wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:Now watching him for the 4th time. Not having a great game shooting, but still contributing. Maybe Danny Granger as a ceiling?

Healthy Danny Granger was a 20ppg scorer. That's too high of a ceiling.


Granger was the classic high usage guy on bad to mediocre teams. Bridges is a more explosive athlete, better suited to be a true lock down defender than Granger. Physically he reminds of Ande Iguadala. Better shooter lesser ball handler.

Yeah, or a slightly shorter Khris Middleton from a couple years ago. Midds is stlll good, but he lost some explosiveness from an injury.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,070
And1: 3,844
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#91 » by vincecarter4pres » Sat Feb 10, 2018 12:31 am

I feel like the top 10 talk was premature and he slips to the late teens and winds up the classic steal and rightfully so. Shouldn't go top 10 not because of age and stuff, but because of his obvious limitations, shouldn't slip to the 20's cause he's an obvious can't miss. Long career with maybe an All Star game or two, but most of his career he's a picture perfect 3rd banana. Lot of guys picked before him where 5 years down the line in hindsight it's like why'd he slip so far and a few guys who went before him and it's like, oh yeah, that's why.

Kittles production, Granger/Josh Howard upside, likely year upon year of Matt Barnes best season plus some, minus the off-court foul ups.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,553
And1: 9,978
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#92 » by The-Power » Sun Feb 11, 2018 12:52 pm

vincecarter4pres wrote:Shouldn't go top 10 not because of age and stuff, but because of his obvious limitations, shouldn't slip to the 20's cause he's an obvious can't miss. Long career with maybe an All Star game or two, but most of his career he's a picture perfect 3rd banana.

The career you expect of him would mean he's an obvious top 10 pick. I personally doubt that he'll ever be an All-Star but he'll be a highly useful player with little uncertainty as to whether he'll be able to make an impact in the NBA. Once you get past the potential franchise players in this draft (even though most will never amount to that), I still have a hard time taking anyone else ahead of him although I might be convinced of one or two players. So for me he remains in the 7-10 range despite cooling off from his hot start.

The 76ers should be all over him if they can get him with the Lakers pick.
Lwcasu
Pro Prospect
Posts: 843
And1: 322
Joined: Apr 10, 2014
Location: China
         

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#93 » by Lwcasu » Tue Feb 13, 2018 3:43 am

Anyone know his hand size? I've seen his wingspan listed between 7-.05/7-1/7-2, but I can't find anything about his hand size.
HotelVitale
RealGM
Posts: 16,922
And1: 12,071
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Location: West Philly, PA

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#94 » by HotelVitale » Tue Mar 13, 2018 5:15 am

The-Power wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:Shouldn't go top 10 not because of age and stuff, but because of his obvious limitations, shouldn't slip to the 20's cause he's an obvious can't miss. Long career with maybe an All Star game or two, but most of his career he's a picture perfect 3rd banana.

The career you expect of him would mean he's an obvious top 10 pick. I personally doubt that he'll ever be an All-Star but he'll be a highly useful player with little uncertainty as to whether he'll be able to make an impact in the NBA. Once you get past the potential franchise players in this draft (even though most will never amount to that), I still have a hard time taking anyone else ahead of him although I might be convinced of one or two players. So for me he remains in the 7-10 range despite cooling off from his hot start.

I've been trying to talk myself into this but I still think he has some risk and isn't nearly as much of a surething starter as you all do. He won't be able to drive consistently against anyone and I don't see much raw passing/vision talent (though I know most guys can get decent at that), and I definitely don't see an all-NBA defense type there. I also see more of a decent open spot-up shooter type than a wet shooter who can hit from all over, on the run, against hard close-outs, etc.

I still like him in general, but don't see why people think he's a shoe-in to a better career than, say, Wes Johnson.
SeattleJazzFan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,341
And1: 2,717
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#95 » by SeattleJazzFan » Wed Mar 14, 2018 1:27 am

definite top 10, possibly should crack the top 7.
nolang1
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,959
And1: 1,757
Joined: Aug 03, 2012

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#96 » by nolang1 » Wed Mar 14, 2018 1:35 am

HotelVitale wrote:
The-Power wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:Shouldn't go top 10 not because of age and stuff, but because of his obvious limitations, shouldn't slip to the 20's cause he's an obvious can't miss. Long career with maybe an All Star game or two, but most of his career he's a picture perfect 3rd banana.

The career you expect of him would mean he's an obvious top 10 pick. I personally doubt that he'll ever be an All-Star but he'll be a highly useful player with little uncertainty as to whether he'll be able to make an impact in the NBA. Once you get past the potential franchise players in this draft (even though most will never amount to that), I still have a hard time taking anyone else ahead of him although I might be convinced of one or two players. So for me he remains in the 7-10 range despite cooling off from his hot start.

I've been trying to talk myself into this but I still think he has some risk and isn't nearly as much of a surething starter as you all do. He won't be able to drive consistently against anyone and I don't see much raw passing/vision talent (though I know most guys can get decent at that), and I definitely don't see an all-NBA defense type there. I also see more of a decent open spot-up shooter type than a wet shooter who can hit from all over, on the run, against hard close-outs, etc.

I still like him in general, but don't see why people think he's a shoe-in to a better career than, say, Wes Johnson.


Compared to Wesley Johnson in 2010, Bridges is a year younger and much better at shooting, defending, and decision-making aka the main attributes you are looking for from this type of player.
MemphisX
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,829
And1: 3,749
Joined: Nov 10, 2011

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#97 » by MemphisX » Wed Mar 14, 2018 6:00 am

The one person that has a definitive role in the NBA. Will likely be a starter for over a decade.
Check out my Memphis Grizzlies Youtube Channel --->>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbB6yGykQEUwl9hqWYVp45g
chefo
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,285
And1: 2,427
Joined: Apr 29, 2009

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#98 » by chefo » Wed Mar 14, 2018 2:20 pm

He strikes me as a smaller Shane Battier type--his raw NBA stats will probably never light the world on fire but he'll be a big net positive for any decent team, barring injury, for quite a while.
User avatar
GIMME_DATT
Veteran
Posts: 2,815
And1: 1,856
Joined: Apr 16, 2014

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#99 » by GIMME_DATT » Wed Mar 14, 2018 3:31 pm

Otto porter Jr is my comparison
HotelVitale
RealGM
Posts: 16,922
And1: 12,071
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Location: West Philly, PA

Re: Mikal Bridges 

Post#100 » by HotelVitale » Wed Mar 14, 2018 3:42 pm

nolang1 wrote:
HotelVitale wrote: I've been trying to talk myself into this but I still think he has some risk and isn't nearly as much of a surething starter as you all do. He won't be able to drive consistently against anyone and I don't see much raw passing/vision talent (though I know most guys can get decent at that), and I definitely don't see an all-NBA defense type there. I also see more of a decent open spot-up shooter type than a wet shooter who can hit from all over, on the run, against hard close-outs, etc. I still like him in general, but don't see why people think he's a shoe-in to a better career than, say, Wes Johnson.
Compared to Wesley Johnson in 2010, Bridges is a year younger and much better at shooting, defending, and decision-making aka the main attributes you are looking for from this type of player.


That's what I mean--Wes Johnson had about the same shooting #s (50/42 vs 52/43), better passing #s, and much better defensive stats (though defensive stats are stupid). But for some reason people think Bridges is absolutely the real deal while Johnson was a phony. It's hard to make the jump to the NBA's athleticism and speed, and a lot of the stuff that Bridges seems very good at now are b/c/o him having NCAA advantages that won't be NBA ones (e.g. length and lateral quickness are great for the NCAA but won't be special in the NBA). I really want to like Bridges and he's shown good stuff but I still see a guy who could fail to be anything special given what he's got now.

To be clear, I don't want to go into the weeds comparing WJ and Bridges. Point was, with Bridges people might be falling in love with a 'type' of the player rather than the player himself, happens every year with a couple of prospects. Half of the posts here are about why it's smart to take a very good role player instead of a potential star--instead of us talking about whether Bridges is really a lock to be a great role player. Based on what we've seen so far, I think he looks like a legit NBA player but there's a big gap between that and an above average starter; will he continue to make great decisions when you have to make them twice as fast, while he continue to shoot great from 3 from 3 ft further and with guys his size guarding him, etc?

Return to NBA Draft