ceremony816 wrote:MAVS
Shumpert
TT
CAVS
Matthews
Noel
Done.
Moderator: ijspeelman
ceremony816 wrote:MAVS
Shumpert
TT
CAVS
Matthews
Noel
ceremony816 wrote:MAVS
Shumpert
TT
CAVS
Matthews
Noel
King Ken wrote:Stillwater wrote:King Ken wrote:I think Cleveland should make about 4 moves.
1. Get a legit PG. George Hill could be that, Idk yet. If he's Utah's Hill, then yes.
2. Move Smith to the bench for Korver. I understand you want to showcase him for trades but yeah, he's washed. He looks like a 14 year vet who relied on athletic ability but worse. Korver is the most effective player for the Cavs outside of James and Love. We all know he's not a 24-28MPG player but need needs to start and get 20MPG. It makes sense.
3. Trade Love to Miami for Whiteside.
4. Move Crowder to the 2nd unit and move TT or Green into the starting five. Ideally, I would prefer someone better than either one of these three. Crowder just isn't playing well at PF. He's a liability but I am afraid they are all liabilities. I would look to trade for a PF. None of these guys can start at PF for a playoff team. I would really look to trading the late 1st and J.R. Smith for Marvin Williams. Plays well in space, shooting the 3 ball at 45.2%. Can defend the PnR. Doesn't protect the rim and offensively can be useless when handling the rock but that's not needed in Cleveland anyway.
http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=y9tvfaz7
I wouldn't move Crowder. You don't have another SF that's legit aside from him. Jeff is more of a undersized PF at this stage of his career.
At the end of the day, time to sell on Love. He is productive but opponents are doing work on him and the team is better without him this year than with him. Then again, the starting five is a mess so everyone including James is hindered by it. He's a terrible center by the way and since TT has regressed. It puts them in a tough position. Plus Miami can afford to lose Whiteside. Miami is better with him on the floor and Bam is ready to get legit backup minutes. That said, Whiteside is one of the most productive centers in the NBA today. His teams don't really benefit from his presence but Cleveland could do to him rim protection.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Crowder is on a decent contract and he should be easy to trade.
We don't decide to not make trades because the player is the only legit positional player when we are not even using them at that position.
Whiteside is a waste of $ if Love is not on the roster at the 4.
If Love gets traded before the deadline ( extremely unlikely) it's for 2 lottery picks bare minimum and a bad contract and it equates to a rebuild which seems highly unlikely considering it would punch Lebrons ticket unless the picks were projected in the top 3 and even then probably would. Gilbert is not going to devalue his product right before he sells it.
Gilbert is going to make every move possible to win now and retain Lebron, because if he doesn't he will not be selling this team for nearly what it is worth right now with no future
Love trade value isn't close to high enough to one really high lottery pick at this point much less two. Maybe in weak classes but not right now. It would take a team to already have a top 10 pick and the players they want are gone to be open to doing it. For example, i could see the Suns doing it if they miss out on Sexton and Young. No offense but I don't see it the way you do. I don't see Crowder having much trade value.
I don't see you doing any better than Marvin in a J.R. Smith trade even with a late 1st attached.
I think any Whiteside acquisition to Cleveland must address the PF position with a stretch 4. It can't work otherwise. Miami is trading Whiteside for anyone on your roster not named Love without the Brooklyn pick. I don't know what you want that makes sense. You literally tried to suggest to Atlanta fans to trade Collins for Crowder. That's like Atlanta fans asking for Love for Bazemore. The trade value is astronomically too wide to even make the suggestion.
You gotta get realistic with the market. And yes, you would like to bring in Whiteside with Love but that's not happening without that Brooklyn pick.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
I was thinking getting Thompson a change of scenery could revitalize him. Taking on TT's contract would suck, but possibly gives the Mavs leverage to get a pick thrown in. Noel is just wasting space on the roster anyway. Shumpert is essentially worthless but are the Mavs really trying to win right now? He also has a cheaper contract than Matthews with the same length.DusterBuster wrote:ceremony816 wrote:MAVS
Shumpert
TT
CAVS
Matthews
Noel
What's the Mavs incentive?
zero24gravity wrote:Hey Cavs fans.
As a Jazz fan, I've heard the rumors about possible interest from the Cavs in Favors, and maybe even Hood. We also have Joe Johnson who could be big-time for a team come playoff time (he was great for the Jazz last offseason). The Jazz have also been center of the Mirotic trade rumors, which makes a lot of sense for the Jazz. I really like Favors a lot & think the Cavs would benefit from him more than you may realize. He's had injuries the last couple seasons, but this season when Gobert was out, a healthy Favors looked like his old-self again. I'd hate to see him go, but also understand that he & Gobert simply don't fit together. So what do you think of these 2 proposals?
Cavaliers get: Derrick Favors, Rodney Hood
Utah Jazz get: Frye, Jae Crowder, Mirotic
Bulls gets: 2018 Cavs first-round pick & Joe Johnson
..OR..
Cavaliers get: Derrick Favors, Rodney Hood, Joe Johnson
Utah Jazz get: Frye, Jae Crowder, Mirotic
Bulls gets: 2018 Cavs first-round pick, & I.Shumpert (Maybe a UT 2nd round pick to offset the additional year Shump has on his contract)
jbk1234 wrote:zero24gravity wrote:Hey Cavs fans.
As a Jazz fan, I've heard the rumors about possible interest from the Cavs in Favors, and maybe even Hood. We also have Joe Johnson who could be big-time for a team come playoff time (he was great for the Jazz last offseason). The Jazz have also been center of the Mirotic trade rumors, which makes a lot of sense for the Jazz. I really like Favors a lot & think the Cavs would benefit from him more than you may realize. He's had injuries the last couple seasons, but this season when Gobert was out, a healthy Favors looked like his old-self again. I'd hate to see him go, but also understand that he & Gobert simply don't fit together. So what do you think of these 2 proposals?
Cavaliers get: Derrick Favors, Rodney Hood
Utah Jazz get: Frye, Jae Crowder, Mirotic
Bulls gets: 2018 Cavs first-round pick & Joe Johnson
..OR..
Cavaliers get: Derrick Favors, Rodney Hood, Joe Johnson
Utah Jazz get: Frye, Jae Crowder, Mirotic
Bulls gets: 2018 Cavs first-round pick, & I.Shumpert (Maybe a UT 2nd round pick to offset the additional year Shump has on his contract)
Yeah, I'm not giving away Crowder like this. We need better defenders at the wing than what we're getting back here.
zero24gravity wrote:jbk1234 wrote:zero24gravity wrote:Hey Cavs fans.
As a Jazz fan, I've heard the rumors about possible interest from the Cavs in Favors, and maybe even Hood. We also have Joe Johnson who could be big-time for a team come playoff time (he was great for the Jazz last offseason). The Jazz have also been center of the Mirotic trade rumors, which makes a lot of sense for the Jazz. I really like Favors a lot & think the Cavs would benefit from him more than you may realize. He's had injuries the last couple seasons, but this season when Gobert was out, a healthy Favors looked like his old-self again. I'd hate to see him go, but also understand that he & Gobert simply don't fit together. So what do you think of these 2 proposals?
Cavaliers get: Derrick Favors, Rodney Hood
Utah Jazz get: Frye, Jae Crowder, Mirotic
Bulls gets: 2018 Cavs first-round pick & Joe Johnson
..OR..
Cavaliers get: Derrick Favors, Rodney Hood, Joe Johnson
Utah Jazz get: Frye, Jae Crowder, Mirotic
Bulls gets: 2018 Cavs first-round pick, & I.Shumpert (Maybe a UT 2nd round pick to offset the additional year Shump has on his contract)
Yeah, I'm not giving away Crowder like this. We need better defenders at the wing than what we're getting back here.
Fair enough. Hood is average on D, so he won't help there. Favs is a very good defender, who has "switchability" though. Stats don't really tell the tale with him with things like positioning and just being in the right place.
If D is your issue, then what about Rubio? His D is pretty awesome, he just can't hit a shot. Kinda the exact opposite of what you have in IT. You do have a lot of PG/SG types already though, so unless you want to give up on Thomas then probably doesn't work.
Rubio, Hood for Frye, IT seems to work salary-wise, but not sure how much I like that as a Jazz fan (probably need a pick as well). I've always thought IT is way overrated.
jbk1234 wrote:zero24gravity wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
Yeah, I'm not giving away Crowder like this. We need better defenders at the wing than what we're getting back here.
Fair enough. Hood is average on D, so he won't help there. Favs is a very good defender, who has "switchability" though. Stats don't really tell the tale with him with things like positioning and just being in the right place.
If D is your issue, then what about Rubio? His D is pretty awesome, he just can't hit a shot. Kinda the exact opposite of what you have in IT. You do have a lot of PG/SG types already though, so unless you want to give up on Thomas then probably doesn't work.
Rubio, Hood for Frye, IT seems to work salary-wise, but not sure how much I like that as a Jazz fan (probably need a pick as well). I've always thought IT is way overrated.
Here's what I would say, Hood and Joe Johnson packaged together have value around the league but less so for the Cavs as currently constructed. Find a third team that would value those guys more than the Cavs and see what type of back court help you can get for them.
DusterBuster wrote:jbk1234 wrote:zero24gravity wrote:
Fair enough. Hood is average on D, so he won't help there. Favs is a very good defender, who has "switchability" though. Stats don't really tell the tale with him with things like positioning and just being in the right place.
If D is your issue, then what about Rubio? His D is pretty awesome, he just can't hit a shot. Kinda the exact opposite of what you have in IT. You do have a lot of PG/SG types already though, so unless you want to give up on Thomas then probably doesn't work.
Rubio, Hood for Frye, IT seems to work salary-wise, but not sure how much I like that as a Jazz fan (probably need a pick as well). I've always thought IT is way overrated.
Here's what I would say, Hood and Joe Johnson packaged together have value around the league but less so for the Cavs as currently constructed. Find a third team that would value those guys more than the Cavs and see what type of back court help you can get for them.
Crazy trade comin your way....
Portland gets:
Love
Frye
Hood
Cleveland gets:
McCollum
Harkless
Exum
Jazz get:
Mirotic
Crowder
Vonleh
Bulls get:
Joe Johnson
CLE 2018 1st Roudner
jbk1234 wrote:
I like Exum's potential but the Cavs shouldn't be giving up a 1st for a player who can't play this year.
zero24gravity wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
I like Exum's potential but the Cavs shouldn't be giving up a 1st for a player who can't play this year.
I don't think Exum is on the block for the Jazz. I think, despite his injuries, he's probably still seen as their #3 piece moving forward, and they'd had to sell low on him at this point. I know I hope he's not traded!
DusterBuster wrote:zero24gravity wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
I like Exum's potential but the Cavs shouldn't be giving up a 1st for a player who can't play this year.
I don't think Exum is on the block for the Jazz. I think, despite his injuries, he's probably still seen as their #3 piece moving forward, and they'd had to sell low on him at this point. I know I hope he's not traded!
He is?! I thought Exum was on the outs in Utah. My bad.
Ok, revision....
Portland gets:
Love
Hood
IT (bought out or rerouted in a secondary deal)
Cleveland gets:
McCollum
Favors
Harkless
Jazz get:
Mirotic
Crowder
Bulls get:
Frye
Vonleh
CLE 2018 1st Roudner
jbk1234 wrote:
This seems like an overpay from the Cavs' perspective. Love & Crowder should be enough to get this done if we're adding Frye & IT's expiring deals.
DusterBuster wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
This seems like an overpay from the Cavs' perspective. Love & Crowder should be enough to get this done if we're adding Frye & IT's expiring deals.
Fair enough, but how would you revise it? It feels like the pieces are there for a really solid 4 team deal that works out for everyone. Are the Bulls willing to take back salary? They're my biggest questionmark here in terms of what they're willing to do and not do.
jbk1234 wrote:DusterBuster wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
This seems like an overpay from the Cavs' perspective. Love & Crowder should be enough to get this done if we're adding Frye & IT's expiring deals.
Fair enough, but how would you revise it? It feels like the pieces are there for a really solid 4 team deal that works out for everyone. Are the Bulls willing to take back salary? They're my biggest questionmark here in terms of what they're willing to do and not do.
I honestly don't know whether the expiring contract or the 1st would be more important to the Bulls but I don't feel like Mirotic is enough to do demand both. Same with Favors tbh.
DusterBuster wrote:jbk1234 wrote:DusterBuster wrote:
Fair enough, but how would you revise it? It feels like the pieces are there for a really solid 4 team deal that works out for everyone. Are the Bulls willing to take back salary? They're my biggest questionmark here in terms of what they're willing to do and not do.
I honestly don't know whether the expiring contract or the 1st would be more important to the Bulls but I don't feel like Mirotic is enough to do demand both. Same with Favors tbh.
My guess would be a 1st more than an expiring. They have a pretty low payroll.
They could do something like this...
To PDX: Love, Hood, Sefolosha
To CLE: McCollum, Favors
To UTA: Crowder, Mirotic
To CHI: Harkless, Vonleh, CLE 1st
Stillwater wrote:DusterBuster wrote:jbk1234 wrote:
I honestly don't know whether the expiring contract or the 1st would be more important to the Bulls but I don't feel like Mirotic is enough to do demand both. Same with Favors tbh.
My guess would be a 1st more than an expiring. They have a pretty low payroll.
They could do something like this...
To PDX: Love, Hood, Sefolosha
To CLE: McCollum, Favors
To UTA: Crowder, Mirotic
To CHI: Harkless, Vonleh, CLE 1st
Cav's won't trade Love for CJ , but if they would the trade is pretty close otherwise ,except that the Bulls are not getting that much for Niko so it's a no go imo.