ImageImage

2018 Brewers Discussion - Yelich Signing on Page 45

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
buckboy
RealGM
Posts: 13,167
And1: 8,543
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: At the Gettin' Place
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1361 » by buckboy » Tue Jan 30, 2018 9:26 pm

trwi7 wrote:This is amazing.

Me 4 days ago: We might have lost some leverage in getting value for Santana.

Others: We'll get value for Santana.

Me: Ehh.

Others: The Marlins got value for Yelich and everyone knew they were trading him.

Me: No, they didn't.

Others: Yes they did.

Me: No, they were shopping him. They weren't going to trade him if they didn't get an offer they liked. We almost have to trade Santana based on Braun and Cain's no trade clauses and just acquiring Yelich. We're not going to go into the season with 4 starting outfielders and Thames, especially when we have a huge need for pitching and if we do, we're not maximizing our roster.

Four days later

HighHeat19 wrote:Domingo Santana: The Brewer's came close to trading Domingo over the weekend. However, their pickups of Yelich and Cain may have impeded that. Apparently, the Brewers had offers for Cleveland, Tampa and one more team on the table. After the Brewer's acquisition of the OF's, it is known that Tampa upped what they wanted in return (Corbin Burnes) in a package for Archer. Stearns said no. Trade with T.B. has been put in limbo for now. My source gave the odds of Santana now be traded are at 75%.


trwi7 wrote:Wait, are you saying that when the Brewers got Yelich and Cain that other teams wanted the Brewers to offer more because other teams feel that they lost leverage and lowered Santana's value? I was told that couldn't possibly happen.


HighHeat19 wrote:Yes.


:lol:


Was Santana traded for less value than you were expecting and I missed it?

Long way to go on that front.
"This is my home, this is my city...I'm blessed to be a part of the Milwaukee Bucks for the next 5 years. Let's make these years count. The show goes on, let's get it."
User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
Posts: 16,762
And1: 1,060
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1362 » by wichmae » Tue Jan 30, 2018 11:00 pm

Read on Twitter
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,497
And1: 11,521
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1363 » by Turk Nowitzki » Tue Jan 30, 2018 11:26 pm

wichmae wrote:
Read on Twitter

This screams of an agent saying "hey, leak another report that the Brewers are being super aggressive so the teams we actually want to go to up their offers" to me. I'm sure we want him, just not convinced he has any intention of ever coming here.

Maybe I'm too cynical and our recent activity has caught his attention, stranger things have happened.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,497
And1: 11,521
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1364 » by Turk Nowitzki » Tue Jan 30, 2018 11:40 pm

DingleJerry wrote:Maybe it was a done deal and TB boned us. Might be a burned bridge if TB backed out of a verbal agreement. That's the risk of dangling so many plates in the air.

If nothing was agreed to it seems like pretty basic negotiating tactics from TB or whoever. If something was actually agreed to and the other team backed out, then yeah that's shady and there's not much Stearns can do about that. But yeah, this is what I was worried about.
User avatar
Gianstoppable
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,585
And1: 1,743
Joined: Jan 07, 2015
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1365 » by Gianstoppable » Tue Jan 30, 2018 11:45 pm

trwi7 wrote:This is amazing.

Me 4 days ago: We might have lost some leverage in getting value for Santana.

Others: We'll get value for Santana.

Me: Ehh.

Others: The Marlins got value for Yelich and everyone knew they were trading him.

Me: No, they didn't.

Others: Yes they did.

Me: No, they were shopping him. They weren't going to trade him if they didn't get an offer they liked. We almost have to trade Santana based on Braun and Cain's no trade clauses and just acquiring Yelich. We're not going to go into the season with 4 starting outfielders and Thames, especially when we have a huge need for pitching and if we do, we're not maximizing our roster.

Four days later

HighHeat19 wrote:Domingo Santana: The Brewer's came close to trading Domingo over the weekend. However, their pickups of Yelich and Cain may have impeded that. Apparently, the Brewers had offers for Cleveland, Tampa and one more team on the table. After the Brewer's acquisition of the OF's, it is known that Tampa upped what they wanted in return (Corbin Burnes) in a package for Archer. Stearns said no. Trade with T.B. has been put in limbo for now. My source gave the odds of Santana now be traded are at 75%.


trwi7 wrote:Wait, are you saying that when the Brewers got Yelich and Cain that other teams wanted the Brewers to offer more because other teams feel that they lost leverage and lowered Santana's value? I was told that couldn't possibly happen.


HighHeat19 wrote:Yes.


:lol:


Honestly I think that guys full of crap regardless, I'd take it as a grain of salt. Brewers took 2 outfielders off the market and have Domingo on. I doubt Domingo lost value because of that, it's more likely he doesnt have a ton of value because he sucks at defense.
#FreeChuckDiesel
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,497
And1: 11,521
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1366 » by Turk Nowitzki » Wed Jan 31, 2018 12:02 am

I want to think that guy is full of crap too and just got lucky on the Yelich stuff but he did know about that Lucroy to Cleveland trade. Maybe he did know a little bit and is embellishing other stuff on his own now, I could buy that.
User avatar
Gianstoppable
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,585
And1: 1,743
Joined: Jan 07, 2015
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1367 » by Gianstoppable » Wed Jan 31, 2018 12:45 am

I know Yu wants to play where it's warmer, but he's got offers from MKE and the Cubs. Sure the Cubs have the better roster and more money but the Brewers have a roof ;) I still think if we're going for it by making these moves we really need to go all in, not just the tip.

Trade Domingo and Ray/Ponce ~ for Salazar and Kipnis

Trade Woodruff, Ortiz, Trent and Erceg + ~ for Archer

Sign Yu/Cobb

Trade Davies for a legit bullpen guy and prospects or just prospects.

Yu, Archer, Salazar, Chacin/Nelson, Anderson,

Move Braun to 1st and spot start in OF, Thames can back up. Trade Jesus

Cain CF
Yelich LF
Braun 1B
Shaw 3B
Kipnis 2B
Pina C
Phillips RF
Arcia SS

Bench:
Villar
Hernan
Thames
Vogt

Probably too many lefties though

Won't need Sogard anymore

Bullpen:
Knebel
Hader
(Davies trade?)
Jeffress
Albers
Barnes
Williams
Logan

I'm bored, none of this probably would ever happen lol just ignore me.
#FreeChuckDiesel
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,652
And1: 4,474
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1368 » by Kerb Hohl » Wed Jan 31, 2018 12:45 am

I came in pretty skeptical but he would have to be extremely lucky to have guessed all of that stuff he knew.
User avatar
Gianstoppable
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,585
And1: 1,743
Joined: Jan 07, 2015
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1369 » by Gianstoppable » Wed Jan 31, 2018 1:01 am

Kerb Hohl wrote:I came in pretty skeptical but he would have to be extremely lucky to have guessed all of that stuff he knew.


Id be more impressed if he called moves that we weren't linked to already. I said we should trade for Yelich and sign Cain a few days before we did, sometimes you just get lucky. But who knows, he could be legit. If he nails another one I'll be a believer
#FreeChuckDiesel
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 108,186
And1: 42,427
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1370 » by ReasonablySober » Wed Jan 31, 2018 1:31 am

I don't think Darvish has any intention to come here. If he did, he'd have signed. He's waiting out other clubs.
Thunder Muscle
RealGM
Posts: 15,698
And1: 1,295
Joined: Feb 18, 2005
Location: WI
       

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1371 » by Thunder Muscle » Wed Jan 31, 2018 1:38 am

ReasonablySober wrote:I don't think Darvish has any intention to come here. If he did, he'd have signed. He's waiting out other clubs.


I agree with this. I don't he does either.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 19,820
And1: 4,366
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1372 » by BUCKnation » Wed Jan 31, 2018 1:39 am

Turk Nowitzki wrote:
wichmae wrote:
Read on Twitter

This screams of an agent saying "hey, leak another report that the Brewers are being super aggressive so the teams we actually want to go to up their offers" to me. I'm sure we want him, just not convinced he has any intention of ever coming here.

Maybe I'm too cynical and our recent activity has caught his attention, stranger things have happened.

My exact thoughts, definitely seems agent related.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1373 » by El Duderino » Wed Jan 31, 2018 1:51 am

ReasonablySober wrote:I don't think Darvish has any intention to come here. If he did, he'd have signed. He's waiting out other clubs.


And it very well could end up being for the best.

Darvish will get 5 or 6 years at big money and giving that kind of money to a pitcher over 30 comes with massive risk to pretty much any team, but it's especially risky in a market like Milwaukee. Have him get injured to his arm/shoulder fairly early into the contract or have him decline after a few years, it would be very harmful, even more so if Cain also declined quite a bit around the same time.

It would be exciting to land him and just as scary once the contract terms were announced.
User avatar
HaroldinGMinor
RealGM
Posts: 15,727
And1: 21,000
Joined: Jan 23, 2013
       

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1374 » by HaroldinGMinor » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:12 am

trwi7 wrote:This is amazing.

Me 4 days ago: We might have lost some leverage in getting value for Santana.

Others: We'll get value for Santana.

Me: Ehh.

Others: The Marlins got value for Yelich and everyone knew they were trading him.

Me: No, they didn't.

Others: Yes they did.

Me: No, they were shopping him. They weren't going to trade him if they didn't get an offer they liked. We almost have to trade Santana based on Braun and Cain's no trade clauses and just acquiring Yelich. We're not going to go into the season with 4 starting outfielders and Thames, especially when we have a huge need for pitching and if we do, we're not maximizing our roster.

Four days later

HighHeat19 wrote:Domingo Santana: The Brewer's came close to trading Domingo over the weekend. However, their pickups of Yelich and Cain may have impeded that. Apparently, the Brewers had offers for Cleveland, Tampa and one more team on the table. After the Brewer's acquisition of the OF's, it is known that Tampa upped what they wanted in return (Corbin Burnes) in a package for Archer. Stearns said no. Trade with T.B. has been put in limbo for now. My source gave the odds of Santana now be traded are at 75%.


trwi7 wrote:Wait, are you saying that when the Brewers got Yelich and Cain that other teams wanted the Brewers to offer more because other teams feel that they lost leverage and lowered Santana's value? I was told that couldn't possibly happen.


HighHeat19 wrote:Yes.


:lol:



You are a true martyr.
At a party given by a billionaire, Kurt Vonnegut informs Joseph Heller that their host had made more money in a single day than Heller had earned from his novel Catch-22.

Heller responds, “Yes, but I have something he will never have — ENOUGH.”
ak7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,545
And1: 1,383
Joined: Jun 04, 2012

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1375 » by ak7 » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:21 am

HighHeat19 said:
My source says the Brewer's and Cubs are trying to play keep away with each other in regards to Darvish. The Cubs biggest fear is the Brewer's getting Darvish. Both team's don't feel the Dodger's have the $ to get Darvish back.

Brewers expecting Darvish to sign by Monday.

The Brewer's also want Archer as well as Darvish.

Stroman was discussed today.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,652
And1: 4,474
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1376 » by Kerb Hohl » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:30 am

El Duderino wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:I don't think Darvish has any intention to come here. If he did, he'd have signed. He's waiting out other clubs.


And it very well could end up being for the best.

Darvish will get 5 or 6 years at big money and giving that kind of money to a pitcher over 30 comes with massive risk to pretty much any team, but it's especially risky in a market like Milwaukee. Have him get injured to his arm/shoulder fairly early into the contract or have him decline after a few years, it would be very harmful, even more so if Cain also declined quite a bit around the same time.

It would be exciting to land him and just as scary once the contract terms were announced.


My take on a 5 or 6 year deal is that if they’re already going for it, it’s of course the risk as the final piece, but if it’s an absolute bust, he’ll rot through a rebuild.

If Cain and Darvish were to decline in 2-3 years, we’d be screwed regardless most likely. The one risk is everyone else panning our and the Brewers not having the little bit extra to get them over the top, but that wouldn’t be the worst problem to have (though it would be annoying).
Tfence92
Starter
Posts: 2,476
And1: 435
Joined: Feb 14, 2015

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1377 » by Tfence92 » Wed Jan 31, 2018 3:45 am

ak7 wrote:
HighHeat19 said:
My source says the Brewer's and Cubs are trying to play keep away with each other in regards to Darvish. The Cubs biggest fear is the Brewer's getting Darvish. Both team's don't feel the Dodger's have the $ to get Darvish back.

Brewers expecting Darvish to sign by Monday.

The Brewer's also want Archer as well as Darvish.

Stroman was discussed today.


A buddy of mine was telling me that same guy had another post about Darvish, apparently he is willing to sign her if we get Archer or Stroman.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,952
And1: 56,205
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1378 » by MickeyDavis » Wed Jan 31, 2018 4:07 am

I remember when Kenny Lofton was a big free agent name in '97. No way he was coming here or that we could afford him but Sal Bando took him out to dinner at an Italian place on the East side. That way his agent had more "leverage" and it could look like the Brewers were being active even though they weren't. He signed with Cleveland (who had traded him a few months before to the Braves) for 4/30.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Tfence92
Starter
Posts: 2,476
And1: 435
Joined: Feb 14, 2015

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1379 » by Tfence92 » Wed Jan 31, 2018 4:38 am

MickeyDavis wrote:I remember when Kenny Lofton was a big free agent name in '97. No way he was coming here or that we could afford him but Sal Bando took him out to dinner at an Italian place on the East side. That way his agent had more "leverage" and it could look like the Brewers were being active even though they weren't. He signed with Cleveland (who had traded him a few months before to the Braves) for 4/30.


So who are we suppose to wine and dine here? Lol

Anronetti? Neander? Random GM who has zero chance to get Santana?
User avatar
LittleRooster
General Manager
Posts: 8,599
And1: 3,247
Joined: Apr 02, 2010
     

Re: 2018 Brewers Discussion - Brewers Sign Matt Albers, 2/$5M (pg 66) 

Post#1380 » by LittleRooster » Wed Jan 31, 2018 4:41 am

MickeyDavis wrote:I remember when Kenny Lofton was a big free agent name in '97. No way he was coming here or that we could afford him but Sal Bando took him out to dinner at an Italian place on the East side. That way his agent had more "leverage" and it could look like the Brewers were being active even though they weren't. He signed with Cleveland (who had traded him a few months before to the Braves) for 4/30.


I was so excited, as an 11 year old, that he would sign here


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Return to Milwaukee Brewers