Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:The Wizards lost to Boston in the playoffs when an exhausted PG kept trying to score.nate33 wrote:DCZards wrote:Yup...this is a new and different style of play that we're seeing from the Zards. It's both enjoyable and long overdue. The improved ball movement has been the key on the offensive end.
Yes, a lot of it is the direct result of the absence of Wall. This kind of play needs to continue when John returns, and I'm foolish (and optimistic) enough to believe that it will. Because this is still a better team with WallStar than without him.
If the Zards make the playoffs and hope to advance, it will need the scoring from the PG position that Wall gives them. Neither Sato nor Frazier can provide that.
Yes. This is all true. Ball movement is great and all, but in the playoffs, teams scout your sets a bit more and you can't always scheme your way into good shots. You still need a guy who can create a reasonably efficient bailout shot if the offense fails. And Wall is arguably the best on the roster at that. We're going to need him in the playoffs.
Basically, this team, without Wall, is sort of like a rich man's version of the Brooklyn Nets. You love their spunk and effort, but deep down, you know the talent level isn't enough to really compete with the elite teams when it counts.
Yes, the Wizards need to play like Boston. Boston moved the ball on offense and played relentless defense, but they also had Isaiah Thomas. Without him, the Wizards would have won the series easily.
I'm saying the Wizards need Wall, but they need him to play better team ball and better defense like Sato, but with the added ability to be a superstar when needed. Heck, just play exactly like Sato, plus about 4 extra points per game via his superior fast break ability. The Wizards blew a couple of fast breaks with Sato running it, that doesn't happen with Wall.