bigfoot wrote:BobbieL wrote:jcsunsfan wrote:
Its not like people want to get rid of Warren. Warren is a great player and does all the things you say. But lets say the Suns draft Doncic. This team would be unbalanced. You have to trade something good to get something good. And it just so happens that quality wings are in high demand. Warren's consistency in scoring, combined with his favorable contract, makes us him a valuable trade piece. If you don't want to trade Warren, you have to trade Jackson. But I happen to think that Jackson's two-way play is what we want to keep. He will really come into his own in a year and a half or so, which fits perfect with everyone else. You cannot trade away trash players like Chriss, Ulis, etc and hope to get the piece you need coming back. This is no longer about assets. Its about building a cohesive team.
If the Suns draft Doncic or Porter, they need to package Warren and picks to get a big. Its just what they have to do.
I have proposed earlier my trades and they don't include Warren. I also understand why Warren could be used in a trade. His sarly on 7/1 jumps to 13m - which makes it easier in terms of matching dollars; the Suns might have too many wings if they get Doncic. So, if it happen - depending the player they get back - I will understand
I also know the guy can score the ball and would be a nice role player off the bench. Guys that can get you double figures off the bench, as Week or BWG noted (Manu, Harden, Iguodala Sweet Lou, remember the Microwave) - good guys to have on yoru team.
If the Suns draft Donic or Porter I would rather keep Warren than trade him for some "imaginary" big man. Most big men are getting 24 minutes or less in the new position-less NBA, with the exception of elite bigs who are monsters on offense too. Rolling out line ups like
Payton/Booker/Jackson/Warren/Bender
Doncic/Booker/Jackson/Warren/Bender
Payton/Booker/Jackson/Doncic/Bender
Payton/Booker/Jackson/Porter/Bender
Booker/Jackson/Warren/Porter/Bender
Payton/Booker/Porter/Warren/Bender
Payton/Booker/Jackson/Warren/Porter
excites me more than a big man who can't shoot free throws, clogs the paint for our PGs, and can't shoot the three ball.
Booker can play 1-3
Jackson can play 2-4
Warren can play 3-4
Bender can play 3-5
Porter could play 3-5
Doncic could play 1-4
If your big man isn't elite on offense or can't shoot the three well, other teams will just play small ball against you to nullify his rebounding and shot blocking advantages on the defensive end. Regardless, I don't see us finding an elite big man in a trade this summer. Likewise, any big man we draft is going to take time to develop which mean we should definitely keep TJ around for a bit longer.
As much as I want the Suns to start getting better next year and pushing for a playoff spot - I listed earlier in this thread - that if they take the two picks this year and sign Payton - it will be 10 players around 25 and under on the roster next year. Play it out in 18/19, Dudley, Chandler, Daniels off the books that summer and see in the summer of 2019 - of those 10 players - who are the ones to move forward with longer term and who need to "go fishing"
I get Booker is one of the 10 so he is a lock. But I agree - I am not moving Warren just because I get Doncic -- this team needs all the GOOD players it can get - especially a guy that can score the ball with a mid range game.