so i did some of bondom34's legwork for him, and here's a four factor breakdown offensively of the following teams while these players are on the court. i took these numbers from stats.nba.com.

now this is interesting. first, i want to point out these would all be top 10 offenses over the course of the current season but none of them would be top 5. i was also surprised at how close kemba walker and kyrie irving offenses were to the thunder's. even without exploring the factors, is a < 1pp100 difference on offense enough to even start arm waving over this and calling out individual comparisons?
my point on offensive rebounding is made here convincingly. the largest gap any of these teams have on any of the others is the thunder's advantage on offensive rebounding. of these four factors, i don't think anyone would argue that ORB% is the one that these players impact the least as high usage scorers and ball handlers.
westbrook's thunder commit the most turnovers, and are second worst on own eFG, the two factors i would argue that these players have the most impact on for their teams.
there just doesn't seem to be much here that would preclude this conversation from even taking place. these four players are close to each other on individual offensive impact looking at the boxscore stats, and would anyone really say that these team numbers with them in the game is enough to shut the door on the comparison? or call it
insane?
we could go deeper and look at teammates and control for that too but in the end we have a metric orpm that is supposed to do that and it has all these guys tightly packed.
so i'll return to my original proposition that the change in league dynamics may be increasing the offensive impact of players with the skillsets of kemba, kyrie, and lillard who can make jump shots at high volume and decreasing the same for players like russell westbrook and john wall who are low % jump shooters.