Sixerscan wrote:Not sure why someone would trade back from 5 to 10 for only the 17th pick unless they thought they could get a top 5 guy at 10.
We're in a pretty unique position because there are elite talents in this draft that are extraneous to our needs; for example we don't need an Ayton because we already have one. Bamba (or though there are questions over whether he is elite) is in the same category. Even a Jackson we don't really "need" - he'd be great but really a bit of a luxury for us given our marquee player does all the things he does except better.
All of the other teams in the mix for a top 10 pick really do need these types of players - even the Celtics. So I agree with what you say - there's no team that is going to trade out of the top 10 unless they get an absolute king's ransom for the trade. To me there's some pretty risky prospects that will go in that top 10 (Marvin Bagley is one) but teams desperately short of talent will pick him there, so perhaps its good not to be in a position to pick a player like that given I think there's a good chance he'll bust relative to where he's picked.
The only real players we need in terms of starting rotation are the wings - the two elite ones in this draft are MPJ and Doncic, and I can't see either of them falling to a spot where we could trade up to get them. Even then MPJ's back injury is a real worry in terms of his long-term outlook.
Thankfully there are some very good wing/combo prospects that will fall just outside the top 10, and hopefully if the Laker pick transfers to us and with our own pick we'll have two bites of the apple at it.











