montestewart wrote:TGW wrote:gtn130 wrote:
Yes but it's a very tough call.
Did you hear about the Clintons in the 90s? They were basically moderate Republicans, which means that in year 2018 everything is the same.
Also, If you vote Democrat you could be accidentally secretly voting for a Republican. Might as well vote Republican to make sure you aren't being duped.
Furthermore, Roy Moore and Anthony Weiner are the same, Doug Jones is very racist and Killary is Killary.
Lmk if you guys have any questions.
I'm sure you have no problems dismissing horrible **** the Democrats do as a liberal white male. Nothing the Democrats do are designed to hurt people like you.
OTOH, I have friends who were locked up for years under the three strikes policy for minor drug offenses. The a-hole Democratic mayor of Baltimore was locking up people I knew left and right.
The Clinton Foundation basically used Haiti, my home country, as their personal piggy bank.
But I should ignore that because "Trump is evil! RUSSIA!" Kiss my ass you sanctimonious POS.
Hey TGW, try not to let it descend into name calling.
I might not agree with you on everything Clinton, but after voting for the Southern satyr in '92, I was disappointed and haven't voted for a Democrat for president since (voting in DC makes that a pretty easy decision).
Some people have difficulty with an honest discussion of the deficiencies of the Democratic party, or at least refuse to engage in one. (Not surprisingly, many Republicans suffer similarly.) Perhaps to them, such acknowledgement is weakness and grants strength to the enemy. I guess that's a valid approach, many people use if, but it's got some drawbacks.
It's not easy learning the acceptable code, but you don't need to let yourself be baited or painted into a corner. Sometimes no response is the best response. Works pretty well for me much of the time.
You guys have valid, differing views. Ditch some of the venom and mischaracterization of positions, and maybe there's an interesting debate in there. Carry on, friends!
What I don't get at all... is comparing the 2 parties and seeing an equivalence. It's like comparing Lebron to the 15th man on the Wizards 14 man roster. Yes, Lebron is bleeping annoying with his whining to the officials and ridiculous ego, but how does me match up overall to the Wiz 15th man? But if we point out there's a difference, we're accused of not being fair. I think it's a Theater of the Absurd situation that we're expected to be okay with - even with someone as even-handed as monte. And nobody spreads the floor better than monte - the ultimate glue guy - call him monte elmer.
