MartinToVaught wrote:Was Harrell only playing 13 minutes part of Doc's strategy too? Face it - there is no strategy. He's clueless.
The argument you want to propose here is that a veteran NBA coach who has experienced assistants, who has been through many situations is clueless, but you know exactly what coaching decisions and rotations etc would be ideal to win games.
I'm fine with people disagreeing with a coaches decision, they are human, they aren't perfect, but all coaches decisions are judged in hindsight and one of my biggest problems is that someone doing what you do doesn't credit the coach when their decisions directly lead to winning.
You should think through these things yourself, I'm not saying you should agree but at least reason through why. The starters were keeping it close all game, they were basically within two points of the Rockets. Doc went with a short rotation, and maybe it was a bad decision, but the Clippers just played one of the better games against Houston in a while and shut down their guards, so I don't know if that's a solid argument.
DJ played 35/48 minutes, Harrell played the other 13. Doc didn't want to go with DJ/Harrell in this one for spacing reasons, so Harrell didn't get more time. Harris was kept on because he was on fire, and he played 40 minutes, then Dekker and Johnson split the time Harris was off. Their role was just to relieve Harris.
Should Doc have used more depth? Maybe, but the starters almost played Houston to a standstill, and the "bench" units he did go with, which weren't really bench units contained the Houston bench lineups. So sure, I can nitpick, but his decisions put the team in position to win, but Houston came in as a team on pace for 65 wins and had won like 14 in a row at home and have been one of, if not the league's best crunch time team, so they win games.