ImageImageImageImageImage

Game 78: Sacramento Kings (24-53) @ Los Angeles Lakers (33-42) - 9:30 PM ET

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,370
And1: 3,059
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Game 78: Sacramento Kings (24-53) @ Los Angeles Lakers (33-42) - 9:30 PM ET 

Post#61 » by BoogieTime » Tue Apr 3, 2018 4:11 am

benchmobbin02 wrote:
RipPizzaGuy wrote:
benchmobbin02 wrote:
Not completely true.

But as Trees said its not worth the convo.
Na y'all right it's a forum not worth the convo. Praise the kings all is good. Joerger is the greatest coach and our team can do no wrong!

Sent from my [device_name] using [url]RealGM mobile app[/url]


Now who is being disingenuous...

The point is we disagree about the message to and the constant nick-picking over a game or 2 here or there when they are determining odd and not slots. We could lose all our games still end up 1 or 10. I think our coach should actually be teaching the team every chance he gets down the stretch as these are the future players that we will have to count on to play in the late game situations. I think it's important and was part of the plan going in. We have talked to death already about the player usage earlier during the year and how some didn't agree with it but none of that matters now. All the matters is the present.

But we aren't gonna convince each other which is why I said it wasn't worth the convo. Both sides have been stated.


And others are very concerned about the Kings dropping from 4-5 to 7-9 with a couple of “teaching moments”

That difference can or can’t be huge. That difference could be used multiple ways, such as trading down etc

It’s a decision that really ruffles the feathers of the fans who do want to see the team following the path of some of its tanking competitors. And if last nights decision and the decisions made in the next week and a half do cost the team that type of draft positioning I will have a foul taste in my mouth for the decision-makers, right or wrong
benchmobbin02
Veteran
Posts: 2,976
And1: 364
Joined: May 28, 2015
     

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Game 78: Sacramento Kings (24-53) @ Los Angeles Lakers (33-42) - 9:30 PM ET 

Post#62 » by benchmobbin02 » Tue Apr 3, 2018 4:14 am

BoogieTime wrote:
benchmobbin02 wrote:
RipPizzaGuy wrote:Na y'all right it's a forum not worth the convo. Praise the kings all is good. Joerger is the greatest coach and our team can do no wrong!

Sent from my [device_name] using [url]RealGM mobile app[/url]


Now who is being disingenuous...

The point is we disagree about the message to and the constant nick-picking over a game or 2 here or there when they are determining odd and not slots. We could lose all our games still end up 1 or 10. I think our coach should actually be teaching the team every chance he gets down the stretch as these are the future players that we will have to count on to play in the late game situations. I think it's important and was part of the plan going in. We have talked to death already about the player usage earlier during the year and how some didn't agree with it but none of that matters now. All the matters is the present.

But we aren't gonna convince each other which is why I said it wasn't worth the convo. Both sides have been stated.


And others are very concerned about the Kings dropping from 4-5 to 7-9 with a couple of “teaching moments”

That difference can or can’t be huge. That difference could be used multiple ways, such as trading down etc

It’s a decision that really ruffles the feathers of the fans who do want to see the team following the path of some of its tanking competitors.
MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,370
And1: 3,059
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Game 78: Sacramento Kings (24-53) @ Los Angeles Lakers (33-42) - 9:30 PM ET 

Post#63 » by BoogieTime » Tue Apr 3, 2018 4:15 am

benchmobbin02 wrote:
BoogieTime wrote:
benchmobbin02 wrote:
Now who is being disingenuous...

The point is we disagree about the message to and the constant nick-picking over a game or 2 here or there when they are determining odd and not slots. We could lose all our games still end up 1 or 10. I think our coach should actually be teaching the team every chance he gets down the stretch as these are the future players that we will have to count on to play in the late game situations. I think it's important and was part of the plan going in. We have talked to death already about the player usage earlier during the year and how some didn't agree with it but none of that matters now. All the matters is the present.

But we aren't gonna convince each other which is why I said it wasn't worth the convo. Both sides have been stated.


And others are very concerned about the Kings dropping from 4-5 to 7-9 with a couple of “teaching moments”

That difference can or can’t be huge. That difference could be used multiple ways, such as trading down etc

It’s a decision that really ruffles the feathers of the fans who do want to see the team following the path of some of its tanking competitors.


Both sides have been stated.


I’m staying it again and clear
benchmobbin02
Veteran
Posts: 2,976
And1: 364
Joined: May 28, 2015
     

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Game 78: Sacramento Kings (24-53) @ Los Angeles Lakers (33-42) - 9:30 PM ET 

Post#64 » by benchmobbin02 » Tue Apr 3, 2018 4:30 am

BoogieTime wrote:
benchmobbin02 wrote:
BoogieTime wrote:
And others are very concerned about the Kings dropping from 4-5 to 7-9 with a couple of “teaching moments”

That difference can or can’t be huge. That difference could be used multiple ways, such as trading down etc

It’s a decision that really ruffles the feathers of the fans who do want to see the team following the path of some of its tanking competitors.


Both sides have been stated.


I’m staying it again and clear
MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!
BoogieTime
General Manager
Posts: 8,370
And1: 3,059
Joined: Feb 09, 2017
 

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Game 78: Sacramento Kings (24-53) @ Los Angeles Lakers (33-42) - 9:30 PM ET 

Post#65 » by BoogieTime » Tue Apr 3, 2018 4:34 am

benchmobbin02 wrote:
BoogieTime wrote:
benchmobbin02 wrote:
Both sides have been stated.


I’m staying it again and clear


:lol: Clear huh :lol:


Your real funny, and rude. Don’t override others opinions please

Return to Sacramento Kings