nate33 wrote:Shanghai Kid wrote:nate33 wrote:
I bet he is. It must be hard to listen to so many people point out how well the Wizards played without him and question how good Wall really is. I expect John to be highly motivated to prove himself. I just hope his metric for proving himself is team wins and not individual stats. I don't want him coming back to score 25 points a night on a TS% of 51%. That doesn't help.
It probably was hard, but probably easy now that the Wiz have been playing .500 or even slightly below .500 ball over the last 12 without him.
The wiz fell back down to earth, and the narrative has switched back to "man they could really use Wall."
I think John has probably learned a lot though from watching Sato.
If that's the narrative, the narrative is wrong. People aren't appreciating the incredibly easy schedule that Wall faced, and the significantly harder schedule that Sato has faced.
With Wall at the helm, the team should have gone 26-11 going by the SRS ranking system and factoring a +3 advantage for home court. They actually went 21-16. They were 5 games below expectations. With Sato at the helm, they should have gone 12-11. They actually went 14-9. They were 2 games better than expected.
Even in this past month, the Wizards should have gone 5-4 and only went 4-5. That's not some kind of serious slump. It's one game below expectations (and about the same level of disappointment as with Wall).
Maybe were overrating the roster. I know specifically many folks seem to think Gortat has been ok (you, payit, many so-called experts on Twitter & bulletsforever) That's simply not true. Gortat has been a disaster in terms of rotating on D but maybe that doesn't show up in the advanced stats yet?
Also a healthy Wall is far better than an injured one. We're supposedly getting the healthy version. That makes a big difference.





















