DCZards wrote:nate33 wrote:All that said, there was one area of concern: Wall took 9 midrange jumpers. He uncharacteristically made 5 of them so it didn't hurt us, but he shot way too many. I realize that's the shot that Toronto is ceding, so maybe it's unavoidable, but I'd really prefer to see John take no more than 5 of them. When Wall is hitting that shot, he's an elite player, but statistically it's far more likely that he misses a bunch of those, and that would have changed the complexion of the game significantly. It sure is nice to have him handling the ball in the final 4 minutes when we're milking a lead though. We didn't score all that efficiently down the stretch, but at least we made some of them, mostly due to Wall's passes. Without Wall, we tend to go 0-fer when we're milking the clock. (Beal missed all his shots in the final 6 minutes of the 4th, shocking!)
I agree with you...for the most part. I cringe every time Wall pulls up for that short jumper. It clearly is not his strength. On the other hand, I want Wall to be able to make that midrange jumper, and the more he takes and makes it the more confidence he has in his ability to hit that shoot...and shooting is more often than not about confidence.
It's a little bit of a double-edged sword. You don't want to see WallStar take the midrange jumper because he's not very good at it. But if he's knocking it down like he did last night the shot becomes an awesome (and important) weapon for both Wall and the Zards.
Wall can get that shot any time he wants. That is a good and bad thing. It is good because it gives them an option to get off a reasonable shot late in the clock. The bad thing is that it tempts him to take them early in the clock, which he does far too often.