Dat2U wrote:OMG why did I have a Luvabull flashback when I saw this pic of Sanders?
yea that's one ugly mug
and uh, could you guys not quote STD please if it's not necessary? the troll block doesn't work when it's quoted unfortunately
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
Dat2U wrote:OMG why did I have a Luvabull flashback when I saw this pic of Sanders?
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
montestewart wrote:nate33 wrote:stilldropin20 wrote:
interesting. and not surprisingly. follow the link above and you will see that Dat2U and TGW are admitted haters of MAGA solely because they didn't jump on board quickly. THEY BOTH WANTED TO JOIN MAGA!!!! Go look before they edit their posts!! But Alas they tidn't think quickly enough and go all in... AKA didn't think they were strong enough to withstand the arrows that would be slung.![]()
![]()
![]()
So now they just hate.![]()
![]()
Guys, guys guys. its never too late. There is space for you. I'll save you a seat. For everyone. For all americans.
I actually think Dat2U makes a good point. There is a cottage industry of alt-right and/or pro-Trump charlatans who are pretending to jump on the bandwagon mostly just for fame and fortune. I am suspicious of many of them.
I've had an idea for years to craft a two panelist talk show that's sort of a hi-test Hannity and Colmes, with a couple of extremely acerbic wordsmiths, a lefty and a righty. A show so tightly scripted that each side lands every point efficiently and with maximum impact, such that partisan fans revere their champion for the harsh eloquence offered while hating the opponent for the caustic blasphemies delivered with equal eloquence.
Fans would tune in to love and to hate and each episode would be like a game where the lead changes with every possession and the winner depends on who you wanted to win. Could even amp up the drama by making the lefty a disabled war veteran and the rightly a Nigerian Muslim immigrant.
Not sure who the sponsors would be, maybe a chain of drug rehab centers.
"No Ragrets" Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.

nate33 wrote:Zonkerbl wrote:I ask again, has *anything* in the Steele dossier been disproven?
Is that the new standard? Make an allegation without proof and it's up to the defense to disprove it? Guilty until proven innocent?
I heard you were a pedophile. Now disprove it.Spoiler:

TGW wrote:So the terrorist who ran over people in Toronto was part of an alt-right group called "incel" or "involuntary celibate"--basically a bunch of nerds that bonded online because they couldn't get a woman to sleep with them.
Notice that Trump didn't say a gotdamn thing about it too (except for a fake tweet made by a staffer). Probably because the nerd wasn't muslim or brown skin.

Zonkerbl wrote:nate33 wrote:Zonkerbl wrote:I ask again, has *anything* in the Steele dossier been disproven?
Is that the new standard? Make an allegation without proof and it's up to the defense to disprove it? Guilty until proven innocent?
I heard you were a pedophile. Now disprove it.Spoiler:
You don’t get off that easy. Explain how the Nunes memo is anything other than a criminally misleading political hit job, given that the entirety of its argument rests on how laughably inaccurate the Steele dossier was? I ask, again, what in the Steele dossier has been disproven, that allowed nunes to fabricate his fantastically mendacious and traitorous memo?
nate33 wrote:Zonkerbl wrote:nate33 wrote:Is that the new standard? Make an allegation without proof and it's up to the defense to disprove it? Guilty until proven innocent?
I heard you were a pedophile. Now disprove it.Spoiler:
You don’t get off that easy. Explain how the Nunes memo is anything other than a criminally misleading political hit job, given that the entirety of its argument rests on how laughably inaccurate the Steele dossier was? I ask, again, what in the Steele dossier has been disproven, that allowed nunes to fabricate his fantastically mendacious and traitorous memo?
The entirety of its argument rests on how laughably unverified the Steele dossier was. All it would take is a couple of Russian operatives to have fed Steele disinformation. You don't wiretap a Presidential candidate based on the word of a couple of Russian "informants".
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
TGW wrote:It's been rough for Sean hack Hannity the past few days. Mr. "Big Government is bad" outed receiving HUD loans...what a friggin' hack.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/sean-hannity-defends-real-estate-portfolio_us_5addf7a7e4b0df502a4e0b52
Pointgod wrote:
Waiting for the both sides people to find a way to blame this on Elizabeth Warren and the Democrats.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
nate33 wrote:
The entirety of its argument rests on how laughably unverified the Steele dossier was. All it would take is a couple of Russian operatives to have fed Steele disinformation. You don't wiretap a Presidential candidate based on the word of a couple of Russian "informants".
The Kremlin targeted educated youth and swing-state voters during its cyberattacks: verified. This has been proven by congressional investigations into Russia's misinformation campaigns.
Trump campaign adviser Carter Page met with representatives of Russian state-owned oil giant Rosneft: verified. The House intelligence committee released a transcript of Page's testimony revealing he did meet with Rosneft officials during a trip to Moscow in 2016.

closg00 wrote:nate33 wrote:
The entirety of its argument rests on how laughably unverified the Steele dossier was. All it would take is a couple of Russian operatives to have fed Steele disinformation. You don't wiretap a Presidential candidate based on the word of a couple of Russian "informants".
Nate, you have falsely asserted repeatedly that the Steele dossier is unverified, this is not accurate. Parts of the dossier have indeed been verified. Among the verified dossier claims:The Kremlin targeted educated youth and swing-state voters during its cyberattacks: verified. This has been proven by congressional investigations into Russia's misinformation campaigns.
Trump campaign adviser Carter Page met with representatives of Russian state-owned oil giant Rosneft: verified. The House intelligence committee released a transcript of Page's testimony revealing he did meet with Rosneft officials during a trip to Moscow in 2016.
Among the dossier claims that are unverified but look money now:
Alleged Cohen Prague trip
It was alleged that Trumps "Fixer" Michael Cohen went to Prague in August 2016 to meet with Russians to clean-up loose ends on Trump/Russia collusion. This allegation was made long before Cohen's role as "fixer" became widely known.
In any case. Cohen swore up and down that he had never been to Prague and filed a law suit against Vox puffing his chest out.
1. Cohen dropped the suit (Vox would have had discovery)
2. Mueller allegedly has information the Cohen was indeed in Prague, therefore moving another Dossier claim into the likely verified category.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/white-house/article208870264.html
Re: The Golden Shower Allegation:
1. Trump has offered to pay woman for sex according to several women
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-23/ex-playmate-says-donald-trump-offered-to-pay-her-after-sex
2. Trump had sex with a porn star
3. Trumps Bodyguard testified that Trump was offered Russian prostitutes during his Russian visit, but that it was turned-down.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-bodyguard-testifies-russian-offered-trump-women-was-turned-down-n819386
I posit that Trumps loyal bodyguard lied to protect Trump. The bodyguard was subsequently given a $15,000 a month "consulting job", paid from an RNC slush fund. The bodyguard was rewarded for his loyalty.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/21/trumps-ex-bodyguard-makes-15000-a-month-from-a-gop-slush-fund.html
Trump turned-down an offer of "beautiful Russian prostitutes"? A man that prefers Eastern European women, who offers money for sex, who has sex with porn stars? The only thing missing is the tape
Trumps lie that he did not spend the night in Russia has recently been debunked.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-russia-dossier-pee-tape-prostitutes-flight-records-moscow-christopher-steele-james-comey-memos-a8319731.html
Go-through the entire list of dossier allegations and compare them to what we know now. The dossier is looking more and more credible, who knows how-many more of the allegations Mueller has been able to verify behind the scenes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump–Russia_dossier
TGW wrote:Pointgod wrote:
Waiting for the both sides people to find a way to blame this on Elizabeth Warren and the Democrats.
Uh, Elizabeth Warren is one of the very few Democrats who is squeaky clean. The other ones OTOH, not so much.
I noticed that resident liberal goof gtn sarcastically mentioned Hillary in his post like she's not the most notorious pay-for-play abuser in politics. Uh sorry to break it to you bitch, but Hillary used Haiti for P2P for years...just read the leaked wikileaks emails.
closg00 wrote:nate33 wrote:
The entirety of its argument rests on how laughably unverified the Steele dossier was. All it would take is a couple of Russian operatives to have fed Steele disinformation. You don't wiretap a Presidential candidate based on the word of a couple of Russian "informants".
Nate, you have falsely asserted repeatedly that the Steele dossier is unverified, this is not accurate. Parts of the dossier have indeed been verified. Among the verified dossier claims:The Kremlin targeted educated youth and swing-state voters during its cyberattacks: verified. This has been proven by congressional investigations into Russia's misinformation campaigns.
Trump campaign adviser Carter Page met with representatives of Russian state-owned oil giant Rosneft: verified. The House intelligence committee released a transcript of Page's testimony revealing he did meet with Rosneft officials during a trip to Moscow in 2016.
Among the dossier claims that are unverified but look money now:
Alleged Cohen Prague trip
It was alleged that Trumps "Fixer" Michael Cohen went to Prague in August 2016 to meet with Russians to clean-up loose ends on Trump/Russia collusion. This allegation was made long before Cohen's role as "fixer" became widely known.
In any case. Cohen swore up and down that he had never been to Prague and filed a law suit against Vox puffing his chest out.
1. Cohen dropped the suit (Vox would have had discovery)
2. Mueller allegedly has information the Cohen was indeed in Prague, therefore moving another Dossier claim into the likely verified category.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/white-house/article208870264.html
Re: The Golden Shower Allegation:
1. Trump has offered to pay woman for sex according to several women
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-23/ex-playmate-says-donald-trump-offered-to-pay-her-after-sex
2. Trump had sex with a porn star
3. Trumps Bodyguard testified that Trump was offered Russian prostitutes during his Russian visit, but that it was turned-down.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-bodyguard-testifies-russian-offered-trump-women-was-turned-down-n819386
I posit that Trumps loyal bodyguard lied to protect Trump. The bodyguard was subsequently given a $15,000 a month "consulting job", paid from an RNC slush fund. The bodyguard was rewarded for his loyalty.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/21/trumps-ex-bodyguard-makes-15000-a-month-from-a-gop-slush-fund.html
Trump turned-down an offer of "beautiful Russian prostitutes"? A man that prefers Eastern European women, who offers money for sex, who has sex with porn stars? The only thing missing is the tape
Trumps lie that he did not spend the night in Russia has recently been debunked.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-russia-dossier-pee-tape-prostitutes-flight-records-moscow-christopher-steele-james-comey-memos-a8319731.html
Go-through the entire list of dossier allegations and compare them to what we know now. The dossier is looking more and more credible, who knows how-many more of the allegations Mueller has been able to verify behind the scenes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump–Russia_dossier

nate33 wrote:And the fact that Trump has sex with porn stars leads me to believe he didn't do anything with Russian prostitutes because he doesn't need to pay for it.
TGW wrote:Uh, Elizabeth Warren is one of the very few Democrats who is squeaky clean. The other ones OTOH, not so much.
I noticed that resident liberal goof gtn sarcastically mentioned Hillary in his post like she's not the most notorious pay-for-play abuser in politics. Uh sorry to break it to you bitch, but Hillary used Haiti for P2P for years...just read the leaked wikileaks emails.