pac213up wrote:How many teams win in the 2nd round of the postseason while missing their top 3 players? This will not be the first. Unfortunate... could have been a great series.
Is brown out for the series? Did I miss something?
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

pac213up wrote:How many teams win in the 2nd round of the postseason while missing their top 3 players? This will not be the first. Unfortunate... could have been a great series.
Bar Fight wrote:Mr Waternoose wrote:Bar Fight wrote:As I said earlier, you can really tell Sixers fans haven't seen a good team in a while the way they're overrating their current team. They are far from a championship contender right now. They'll probably get there in a few years, but they're about the same level as last year's Wizards right now.
Sixers are 8-1 to win championship. I guess Vegas hasn't seen a good team in a while either
I think that might have something to do with Lebron having his worst supporting cast ever and the Raps being the only healthy contender in the East. The Sixers don't have a shot in hell of winning the title though. We all know this.
the_process wrote:Green89 wrote:Canadian6ersFan wrote:
So did Miami. And Simmons averaged a triple double for the series.
Miami has no one like Celtics players #36 and #37.
I hope Smart defends like that pic all series long. He’ll be fouled out of every game.
Sixerscan wrote:pac213up wrote:How many teams win in the 2nd round of the postseason while missing their top 3 players? This will not be the first. Unfortunate... could have been a great series.
Is brown out for the series? Did I miss something?

pac213up wrote:Sixerscan wrote:pac213up wrote:How many teams win in the 2nd round of the postseason while missing their top 3 players? This will not be the first. Unfortunate... could have been a great series.
Is brown out for the series? Did I miss something?
Doubtful game 1....which means unlikely game 2 as well. At that point does it really matter...lol.

Kyrie For Three wrote:pac213up wrote:Sixerscan wrote:Is brown out for the series? Did I miss something?
Doubtful game 1....which means unlikely game 2 as well. At that point does it really matter...lol.
There is a good chance he's back for game 2 due to the days off between 1 and 2.

Sixerscan wrote:Kyrie For Three wrote:pac213up wrote:
Doubtful game 1....which means unlikely game 2 as well. At that point does it really matter...lol.
There is a good chance he's back for game 2 due to the days off between 1 and 2.
Yeah who knows if he's even going to miss game 1. Embiid was doubtful for game 3 and he played.

GreenBloodedC wrote:Bar Fight wrote:Mr Waternoose wrote:
Sixers are 8-1 to win championship. I guess Vegas hasn't seen a good team in a while either
I think that might have something to do with Lebron having his worst supporting cast ever and the Raps being the only healthy contender in the East. The Sixers don't have a shot in hell of winning the title though. We all know this.
Don't be too hard on them. They haven't been in the playoffs in awhile. All of this is new to them.

SMTBSI wrote:the_process wrote:Green89 wrote:
Miami has no one like Celtics players #36 and #37.
I hope Smart defends like that pic all series long. He’ll be fouled out of every game.
What most Celtic fans don't understand when complaining about the calls players like Lebron/Giannis/Harden get on offense, is that Smart gets the same benefit of the doubt on defense. He gets away with a lot. In both cases, I can only assume the league views this as a feature-not-a-bug, so I wouldn't pin my hopes on it changing.

pac213up wrote:How many teams win in the 2nd round of the postseason while missing their top 3 players? This will not be the first. Unfortunate... could have been a great series.
SuperDario wrote:titlebound1 wrote:SuperDario wrote:
Yep, 83 Sixers were better. If you think 86 Celtics are the best ever than 86 Rockets must be up there, considering they gave Boston all they could handle.
That 86 rockets team had maybe the best big man of all time and Ralph Sampson. They hammered the showtime Lakers that year. You are not showing then enough respect.
Telhe 86 Celtics had 5 hall of famers including Larry legend...who btw was better than anyone on the 76ers
Hakeem was in his 2nd season. That Rockets team ranks pretty low on the totem pole of all time runner ups. Moses and Dr J would have shown Bird the 50 states like they did in 83.
Anyway the only reason I brought those teams up was to make fun of Celtics fans dwelling in the past and deflecting from the current series.
Fencer reregistered wrote:pac213up wrote:How many teams win in the 2nd round of the postseason while missing their top 3 players? This will not be the first. Unfortunate... could have been a great series.
As long as Horford is healthy, the Cs aren't missing their top 3 players.

titlebound1 wrote:SuperDario wrote:titlebound1 wrote:
That 86 rockets team had maybe the best big man of all time and Ralph Sampson. They hammered the showtime Lakers that year. You are not showing then enough respect.
Telhe 86 Celtics had 5 hall of famers including Larry legend...who btw was better than anyone on the 76ers
Hakeem was in his 2nd season. That Rockets team ranks pretty low on the totem pole of all time runner ups. Moses and Dr J would have shown Bird the 50 states like they did in 83.
Anyway the only reason I brought those teams up was to make fun of Celtics fans dwelling in the past and deflecting from the current series.
Literally no one agrees with this other than 76ers fans.
Malone + Irving is great. But Bird was better than Irving. And Parish is good enough to match up with Malone. McHale would have ruined that team. Like whatever he wanted. And what would they have done with Walton? The Celtics we're bigger at pretty much every position and had superior talent to go along with a top 5 player of all time.
That was not the real showtime Lakers that you guys beat. The Celtics and Lakers were great in 83 too...but neither team peaked at that point yet. You guys had your one year during a decade that LA and Boston doninated.
The 86 Celtics are the best ever. Certainly better than some little Philly team
Green89 wrote:Canadian6ersFan wrote:KHRICH wrote:Boston has the bodies and wings to throw at Simmons, ill say Boston in 7.
So did Miami. And Simmons averaged a triple double for the series.
Miami has no one like Celtics players #36 and #37.
the_process wrote:SMTBSI wrote:the_process wrote:
I hope Smart defends like that pic all series long. He’ll be fouled out of every game.
What most Celtic fans don't understand when complaining about the calls players like Lebron/Giannis/Harden get on offense, is that Smart gets the same benefit of the doubt on defense. He gets away with a lot. In both cases, I can only assume the league views this as a feature-not-a-bug, so I wouldn't pin my hopes on it changing.
If Smart’s getting that call, then I have to figure Simmons is getting his forearm shiver move too. So it will even out IMO.
SuperDario wrote:titlebound1 wrote:SuperDario wrote:
Hakeem was in his 2nd season. That Rockets team ranks pretty low on the totem pole of all time runner ups. Moses and Dr J would have shown Bird the 50 states like they did in 83.
Anyway the only reason I brought those teams up was to make fun of Celtics fans dwelling in the past and deflecting from the current series.
Literally no one agrees with this other than 76ers fans.
Malone + Irving is great. But Bird was better than Irving. And Parish is good enough to match up with Malone. McHale would have ruined that team. Like whatever he wanted. And what would they have done with Walton? The Celtics we're bigger at pretty much every position and had superior talent to go along with a top 5 player of all time.
That was not the real showtime Lakers that you guys beat. The Celtics and Lakers were great in 83 too...but neither team peaked at that point yet. You guys had your one year during a decade that LA and Boston doninated.
The 86 Celtics are the best ever. Certainly better than some little Philly team
I was going to respond until I read that last line.
Wasn't a good start when you referred to Dr J as "Irving".