The-Power wrote:KobesScarf wrote:He's clearly the Raptors best player and his impact has been greater this year leading the Raptors to 60+ wins than it ever was.
He's not been clearly their best player and there's plenty of evidence that his impact isn't great at all. Agree to disagree.KobesScarf wrote:Did you start watching basketball in 2014? The Warriors did not invent basketball.
Tell me, why are you here again? To be insolent to people who disagree with you while not adding anything of value to this board? But if you want to play that game: did you stop trying to understand basketball past 1980 when focusing primarily on basic boxscores without context was still acceptable? The Warriors have literally nothing to do with this by the way, but nice try.
edit: but this thread isn't about DeRozan. DeRozan was an example to illustrate my approach to eminence's interesting way to rank prospects. Nothing more and nothing less. If you want to have a discussion about the goodness and impact of DeRozan you might want to consider opening a thread on the PC board. Here it is clearly OT and I won't further comment on DeRozan in this thread.
Derozan is clearly the Raptors best player and there is not even a close 2nd. No one even debates this. But even if he was the 3rd best player your statement would still be ridiculous
You opinion of Derozan does illustrate a new basketball fans perspective where they view pretty much every aspect of basketball through the prototype of the Warriors and no matter how good if they don't fit in to the Warriors they more or less suck.