pcbothwel, welcome to the thread. Don't knock Rachel Maddow - there's a reason the evil billionaires running the Republican grift don't want you to watch her. I too was a victim of the smear campaign of her but my opinion of her changed after I read this interview of her by Ezra Klein:
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/2/9/10951090/rachel-maddow-ezra-kleinDemocracy is on fire right now and unless we can convince guys like you to put down the gasoline and torches we're done. It'll be a slow and painful process, and my kids will suffer, and my grandkids will suffer even more, and I'm trying like crazy not to put them through that.
The internet has lowered the cost of manipulating people who don't mind being manipulated, who *want* to be manipulated. That's you - now hear me out, I don't mean that as an insult. You are being played by Trump, whose business model is to profit off of gullibility. He is a genius at the con. But con games have two participants, the player and the played. Why do you choose to let yourself be played? Does Trump's message heal some deep pain inside you? What happened to you? Why are you in such pain? Can we fix it so you don't feel you have to destroy Democracy to make yourself feel better?
You are a valuable person. Your opinion matters. You are smart enough to perceive the truth yourself, and not have it dictated to you by someone else. But that's what the grifters say too. How do you break out of the grifters' grip? The first sign that you're reading something that is true is it does not give you an adrenaline rush of good feeling after reading it. It's not crack, it's vegetables. It doesn't confirm what you want to hear. It doesn't make you mad (that's what the grifters on the other side try to do), but it leaves you a little disappointed, in yourself and in others, for being fooled. It forces you to confront some ideas that you were taking for granted before. It doesn't feel good to acknowledge the truth. But it does mean you are a real man, an independent thinker, and not a patsy.
People have asked me on this thread, if we can't trust Breitbart/Fox/Sinclair as a news source, what should we watch? There's no one news source that has a monopoly on truth, that's kind of how the press works - they succeed in the market of providing information 1) by providing news that people are interested in (this is what Fox/Breitbart/Sinclair excel at) and 2) showing that they are better than other news providers by showing the other news is false. And within each news agency there are all-stars, even in the crappool that is CNN. So following individual journalists on Twitter is a good way to start.
For those of us choosing not to participate in the Breitbart/Fox/Sinclair/Trump grift, it's obvious where the good news sources are. But you have to identify them yourself - if you let someone else dictate to you where the truth comes from, you've already lost the game.
I've been taught all my life to value service to the weak and powerless.