Mulhollanddrive wrote:Wouldn't mind either way the goal is to get All-Stars.
I don't really get the phenomenom of bagging star players any time they're mentioned as a trade target.
Its not bagging on him, everyone knows that KAT is a great F'n player that we would have LOVED to have prior to the lotto.
My biggest issue is that we have the top pick in the draft and have the chance to draft a guy that is supposed to pretty much be a more athletic version of him. We have that pick and can draft that guy. Ayton is from here (Somewhat) and wants to play here, and has a built in fanbase already. Sure KAT is buddies with Booker, but who knows where he wants to be. With KAT, we would have to give up quite a few assets to get him. besides the #1, its going to take a package of Jackson/future 1sts and maybe even a Warren for Wiggins (Or Teague) swap as well. And then on top of that, unlike whoever we draft at #1, KAT is in the last season of his rookie deal, so expect to pay the kid $20M+ EASILY (Where Ayton would cost us less than half that for the next 4 years). Thats why people arnt down with the Kat trade, its not because he is a star, its because it would cost us too damn much in the long run.
If we could keep Booker/Jackson/1st and still get KAT, im all for it as im sure everyone would be, but the fact of the matter is that it would cost us way more than that.