BayArea408415 wrote:bmurph128 wrote:BayArea408415 wrote:My point is that Warriors were losing. Klay got hot and then Curry followed. Then, both went off. Front runner implies they only play well when the team is already up big. Durant was crap this game. Klay and Curry turned it from a double digit deficit to a 30 point blow out.
Front runner is an exaggeration people make. But they've both shown they don't play consistent enough in the playoffs.
And obviously one of them would be guarding Paul, who has probably been Houston's best player in this series and possibly the best player in the series period thus far...so given the circumstances it seems a little odd to use this game as the reason why they aren't "front runners".
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using
RealGM mobile app
Can you just ignore me? I have you on ignore for a reason but you still quote me. You’re never impartial when discussing the Warriors. Sure, Warriors should have been down in the first place but Rockets shots light out. When Rockets settled back down to reality, Warriors had their own run and game over. I was expecting a blowout with CP3 out and that’s what we got.
I still believe this series was over in 6 if Iguodala didn’t miss 3 games and CP3 was healthy. However, disingenuous Warriors haters act like Mbah Mbah Moute and Iguodala are on comparable levels or imply Warriors fans are comparing Iguodala’s absence to CP3’s absence. Iguodala is 5x the player Mbah Mbah Moute is and ever will be. One player is a Final’s MVP, highest IQ on the Warriors and has the ability to have DPOY level impact. Mbah Mbah Moute is a solid 3 and D guy player who can switch well. He can’t make CP3 or Harden go 1/41 in one on one situations like Iguodala supposedly has.
The amount of disrespect shown toward Iguodala on this forum is insane. He was the MVP in Game 5 of last year’s Finals. That series goes at least 6 without Iguodala. Possibly even 7. People underestimate how good the Irving and LeBron combo was since the Warriors dispatched them in 5. Last year’s Warriors team was better.
I was quite confused at that image, it said 41 matchups and 1 FG allowed, but does that mean they shot 41 times? 41 "matchups" is not 41 FGA. I read it as him discouraging FGA attempts from them, and of course also forcing misses, but I don't know if that was saying that he forced 40 misses. According to NBA.com, he had held Paul/Harden/Gordon to 6/19 FG (32%) over those first 3 games, which makes sense especially since Harden shot poorly in game 2 anyways, and Paul in game 3. The interpretation of him holding Harden and Paul to 1/41 FG doesn't line up with watching the games and is certainly not what that image was saying.
I don't know about any recent numbers on Mbah, but he's a very solid defender, very, very solid. Here's some of what I can find:
I am more versed with what he did defensively as a Clipper, and this was part way through the 15-16 season:
Mbah a Moute owned the best defensive rating on the team during the regular season among Clippers who played at least 30 games. He also held opponents this season to just .469 points per possessions in isolation – the best mark in the NBA among players with at least 50 defensive possessions.
https://www.nba.com/clippers/news/mbah-moutes-defensive-versatility-stands-out“He is one of the best defensive players in the league, bar none,” Rivers said. “But because he’s not a scorer, no one really notices, but that’s his value to a team. Plus his IQ and he’s an off-the-chart teammate. You would want Luc on your team even if he didn’t play; that’s how good of a guy he is on your team. It’s good to have those types of guys on your team.”
http://www.sacbee.com/sports/nba/sacramento-kings/kings-blog/article126657859.html
I agree that Iguodala is a very useful player, but along the way you are short-changing how good Luc can be on defense and his IQ as a player and just tagging him as just another solid 3/D guy. I don't know what his numbers in isolation, etc looked like with the Rockets this season, but anecdotal evidence says it was similarly very good.