Joey Wheeler wrote:If Curry was in Milwaukee and Giannis a part of this GSW roster no one would be peddling this 100%-results driven narrative.
We'd be centered around the LeBron-Harden debate in the finals instead.
Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier
Joey Wheeler wrote:If Curry was in Milwaukee and Giannis a part of this GSW roster no one would be peddling this 100%-results driven narrative.

therealbig3 wrote:I agree that Curry is clearly superior to Giannis when both play, but I just can't look past the missed games, sorry. If Giannis missed that many games, his team would have been out of the playoffs. As is, his team came close to beating the Celtics in the 1st round. Without him, his team gets swept.
Curry is fortunate to be on a team that can win a lot of games and a 1st round playoff series without him, maybe even 2 (they crushed NO in game 1 without him). If he was on another team, that team suffers greatly for losing him and probably isn't anywhere near as successful. And that would be a big deal. The only reason we're able to hand wave away the missed time is because he's on GS, who still has 3 All-Stars even if Curry goes down, so the team still wins. Curry shouldn't get rewarded in a POY context because of that.
Heej wrote:For me the missed games count less than the impact on winning. I truly think Curry's total value added has been greater. Part of it is that the team got past the first round without him, but if they switch places Curry is that much better than Giannis (especially in closing games) that they'd have had a real shot at being better than a 7th seed going into the playoffs.
Giannis plays more games but I think each game Steph played he gave his team that much higher a chance of winning that it made up for the increased percentage of winning Giannis added by playing in the games Steph missed. I think we've learned in these playoffs that there's entire vast gulfs of distance in impact between the top 2 or 3 players in the league at any given moment and the guys a tier below. If a Giannis tier guy adds 20% to win probability I believe Steph is legitimately a 25% guy comparatively. I personally value that more because Steph's impact above a replacement level player just far outstrips Giannis'. Though I welcome the disagreements
Edit: I rather like my guy Doctor MJ's concept of shape or profile of impact. I think Steph's impact profile is more advantageous and less easily replaced or replicated than the Profile of a Lebron or Giannis. Though LeBron is simply better. If you remove both, a competent lead ballhandler can replace a point forward more easily than a JJ Reddick type off ball screen runner can replace what Steph brings imo
Jaivl wrote:Joey Wheeler wrote:If Curry was in Milwaukee and Giannis a part of this GSW roster no one would be peddling this 100%-results driven narrative.
We'd be centered around the LeBron-Harden debate in the finals instead.
Peregrine01 wrote:I love Curry but I too think the missed games should count against him to some degree. Also, how much does post season performance count? Does curry get a leg up on Giannis for his team going deeper in the postseason and him being the most impactful player on said team?
eminence wrote:Series has gone about how I'd expect so far, some fight from the Cavs, but doesn't look overly competitive. Which unfortunately leaves me quite conflicted what to do with LeBron. Ahh well, we'll see what happens in Cleveland.

therealbig3 wrote:Posted this on the GB, but figured it has its place here too, just to keep some perspective:
You know, as much as I hated KD's decision to go to GS, and as much as I actually feel that he's generally overrated, he's a good dude man. Watching that clip of how he helped those HS seniors just bought him a lot of respect in my book.
Easy to act like these guys aren't human beings and to just 100% judge them based on the basketball decisions they make, or their responses in the media, but KD has always seemed like a good dude and he's always been someone who's helped out in his community.
Props to him.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO

MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Basileus777 wrote:Curry's missed games should absolutely be held against him, but he's the 2nd best player in the world when healthy.
And watching these Warriors, I continue to struggle to see why Durant should be ranked higher than Draymond. When the Warriors repeat, their defense is going to be why, and Green is simply making a profound impact there.
ronnymac2 wrote:Basileus777 wrote:Curry's missed games should absolutely be held against him, but he's the 2nd best player in the world when healthy.
And watching these Warriors, I continue to struggle to see why Durant should be ranked higher than Draymond. When the Warriors repeat, their defense is going to be why, and Green is simply making a profound impact there.
Do you see any potential disconnect in this post in regards to Curry and Green?