Pharmcat wrote:Ignitowsky wrote:Pharmcat wrote:hes the next mardy collins...taking him over mitchell was the blunder of the decade![]()
Spare us the hyperbolic bs. The Knicks were one of 12 teams to pass on him. But you already knew that.
except most of those other 12 teams scored on their players and are happy with who they got . frank was 25th in rookies for ppg. total bust selection considering studs like mitchell were still available on the board
NO ONE had the expectation that a 19 year old kid coming from Europe, playing in a dysfunctional offensive and defensive system, would be anything but a PROJECT. Even given all if that his 3 point shooting % was within 2 points of Mitchell's and his per 36 rebounds and assists were about the same.
But here's the interesting thing. Frank gave up .65 ppp in PnR defense, best in the league. I'm sure I don't need to remind you of Kanter's horrific defense, or the fact that porzingis missed a significant part of the season.
the kid is a gym rat and is still developing physically and mentally. He has excellent shooting mechanics and is putting in the work to improve his handle and his ability to finish at the rim. he now has a coach that will teach him how to be a better NBA player and that will use him in ways that will increase the possibility of him succeeding in any given situation.
I know that you're not a 14 year old kid jumping to conclusions about a first-year player based on incomplete and/or missing information. it really surprises me that someone that's been around as long as you have would so quicklyjump to such a naive conclusion. ANY experienced basketball fan knows that you often can't really judge a draft years after it's taken place. To call Frank a bust at this point is just completely ridiculous.