MrDollarBills wrote:steady wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:
You cannot make exceptions to the rule because its the championship series. Draymond Green is a habitual offender and verbally abuses the refs every game. Had Draymond had some self control, he wouldn't have been in that position to get suspended to begin with. He brought that on itself, the NBA was just enforcing the rules.
i know what you're saying , but I disagree. I do not want Championships decided based on officiating. If it had been a flagrant foul where someone was seriously injured or could have potentially been seriously injured, I would at least partially understand. But a suspension to teach Draymond Green a lesson .. during a Championship series (for a foul that wasn’t even called in real time because the contact was so negligible and was only categorized as flagrant days after the game was over). To me, that was the wrong call by the League.
teaching him a lesson? the dude was out there kicking dudes in their dicks FFScome on fam. **** a championship series. the rules are the rules.
so you're advocating that, because its the finals, it should be no holds barred?
so lets say if Draymond Green for some reason clotheslines Lebron James tomorrow night on a bang bang play. i mean straight up gives him a LARIAT-O!! like Kevin McHale did to Kurt Rambis in the 1984 finals, you would be perfectly fine with the league letting Green play the next game? to avoid teaching draymond "a lesson"????
i disagree with you 100%. the rules that are in place come first tip off in oct/nov should be the same rules in place come june. if you act like a **** boy, you need to take a seat. this isn't a case about officiating deciding finals. its a case of a habitual offender reaping what he has sowed.
It was a situation where a no call became a flagrant foul after the fact. And where the whistle should have first been blown when LeBron’s flailing caused Draymond to go down. The officials allowed the play to unfold for too long without intervening and then the League decided to make up for their inaction two days after the fact by calling a flagrant
It was an in hindsight call made to try to cover over the mess the officials caused
I’m not upset about it but Imo it was one of the most bizarre intrusions of bad officiating into an NBA championship series
Re clothesline fouls. I said “If it had been a flagrant foul where someone was seriously injured or could have potentially been seriously injured, I would at least partially understand.”






























