payitforward wrote:The objection about Lebron makes sense of course -- but only if they are in (or want to be in) "the Lebron sweepstakes." I don't think they are. More importantly, I wouldn't want to be.
Why? B/c the opportunity to win a title comes when GS slips, which won't be this coming year or (likely) not the year after either. Philly is incredibly loaded with young talent (despite the failed pick of Okafor & the foolish trade with Boston last year). They don't need to add a quick-fix superstar, they need to allow their core to grow up & add to it.
This is where we differ. I might agree with this if adding Lebron meant losing Embiid or Simmons, but it doesn't. They'd be adding him with cap space without sacrificing anyone. If you can add the second-best player ever without breaking up your young core, you do it every time.
That's IMO. Anyone could have a different opinion, of course, but you can see why, given my opinion, the trade makes sense for them. If it's not quite right in terms of weights in the 2 scales, I think that would be easy to fix via R2 picks.
If I see a problem from our POV, it would be if we gave up an important difference in talent/future by dropping from 15 to 26. & we might! That's where I'd be doing my own due diligence.
Anyway... just an idea. Thanks for responding.
I love the deal from our perspective, but If they decide to give up their 2018 max slot, which this Mahinmi deal does, there are better options out there than our deal:
- They can work something out with Memphis for the 4th pick. They have enough space to absorb Parsons' salary without sending money out.
- Denver is desperate to unload Faried' because re-signing Jokic puts them in the tax. Philly can get the 14th pick back without giving up Holmes and the picks.
- Charlotte is up against the tax as well. Philly could work out something for #11 that has them taking on Marvin Williams or MKG without sending back salary.
- The Clippers might be willing to give up one of their lotto picks to get out of Gallinari's huge deal.
All of those deals involve a) desperate teams, b) players whose deals expire at the same time as Mahinmi's (before in Faried's case) , and c) players who fit better next to Simmons and Embiid than Mahinmi. And they'd be giving up less in all those deals than Holmes, 26, and 38.
It's cool that we disagree on this. Reading different perspectives on all these moves is what makes this board fun.