ImageImageImage

Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,149
And1: 61,003
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1741 » by bwgood77 » Sun Jun 17, 2018 1:24 am

JMac1 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
JMac1 wrote:
I agree. Kuzma plays a better role than JJ does. Kuzman doesn't have JJ upside and multitude of ability. Kuzman is a medium tough 3D guy that spaces the floor and rebounds ok. He is a solid role-player, JJ can be an elite role-player/allstar. His shooting will limit his ceiling. He definitely has Kawhi/Butler ceiling. Maybe won't get as high as Leonard, but definitely reach Butler status, and as a number 3 option, that's fine.


He will DEFINITELY reach Butler status? I mean I love JJ and optimism but he's got a long ways to go. Shooting is pretty important. Though it's also Butler's weakness and he is one case of an all star who had a bit of a bumpy start.


I mean ha could reach Butler's ceiling moreso Leonard. I don't know even if he reaches his ceiling it will be Leonard, but if he does, it will definitely be Butler's.


While I don't like to put ceilings on people because the sky is the limit for pretty much anyone if they get to the NBA if they have the tools, I think Butler would be a nice ceiling.

I just really hope the shooting drastically improves this year, because it is very hard to be a real impact player if you can't at least stretch the floor to some extent and be respected by the defense. If he can get a good shot, he should end up being feared by the defense. I mean guys like Smart you can maybe call impact players, but people are already penciling JJ in as a Suns "big three" guy and a guy like Smart is far from that. So the shooting has to come. Luckily that is one thing Igor has helped people with. Maybe the hair cut helps too!
User avatar
LukasBMW
Suns Forum SlamDRUNK Contributor
Posts: 4,827
And1: 4,291
Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Location: Phoenix AZ & San Diego CA
 

Re: RE: Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1742 » by LukasBMW » Sun Jun 17, 2018 1:31 am

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
Wilber85 wrote:
LukasBMW wrote:
F-that.

I want Kuzma.

Then we still make the trade with Memphis to get #4

Doncic/Knight/Ulis
Booker/Daniels
JJ/TJ
Kuzma/Chriss
Ayton/Bender/Sauce

Parsons and Deng rot on IR until they become assets we can use with our future picks to address the spots where guys don't work.


Not going to lie, y'all are nuts. Kuzma was good on a crap team. He is not a starter IMO. He will be an amazing off the bench role player for many years to come on a good team.

If you can get Ball (Yes, I am a big hater of ball) I think he can become a pass first defensive PG that the suns need, and would be a good fit next to booker.
If kuzma is just a stats on a bad team guy then what does that say about any of the current suns?

Sent from my SM-G930V using RealGM mobile app


I'm also thinking about maturity and chemistry. Ball has his own TV show, shoe, and a crazy father. He raps like he is already a superstar. Don't want his circus or ego anywhere near this team. Booker and JJ are alpha and both get along. Ayton will fall in line and fit in. Don't need any new lions disrupting the food chain.
Image
JMac1
Suns Forum Training Specialist
Posts: 10,032
And1: 4,004
Joined: May 23, 2009

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1743 » by JMac1 » Sun Jun 17, 2018 1:32 am

bwgood77 wrote:
JMac1 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
He will DEFINITELY reach Butler status? I mean I love JJ and optimism but he's got a long ways to go. Shooting is pretty important. Though it's also Butler's weakness and he is one case of an all star who had a bit of a bumpy start.


I mean ha could reach Butler's ceiling moreso Leonard. I don't know even if he reaches his ceiling it will be Leonard, but if he does, it will definitely be Butler's.


While I don't like to put ceilings on people because the sky is the limit for pretty much anyone if they get to the NBA if they have the tools, I think Butler would be a nice ceiling.

I just really hope the shooting drastically improves this year, because it is very hard to be a real impact player if you can't at least stretch the floor to some extent and be respected by the defense. If he can get a good shot, he should end up being feared by the defense. I mean guys like Smart you can maybe call impact players, but people are already penciling JJ in as a Suns "big three" guy and a guy like Smart is far from that. So the shooting has to come. Luckily that is one thing Igor has helped people with. Maybe the hair cut helps too!



That's everything. I know this made Revived bemoan me, however, if JJ can shoot 75-80 from the line and 35-36 from three, he could surpass Booker as our best player if Booker doesn't tighten up his D. Also, if Ayton defense is a result of coaching and system and he improves, he could be our 1st or second option. I still have Bender at option 4 or 5 thru this year...

Booker's D
Josh's Shot
Bender's heart
Ayton's D......the good thing is it is just putting in the time. There are no limitations because lack of height, size or athletic ability holding any of them back.

Sounds like these guys need to go see the Wizard of OZ.
Waylay13
Rookie
Posts: 1,164
And1: 933
Joined: Apr 10, 2016
 

Re: RE: Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1744 » by Waylay13 » Sun Jun 17, 2018 1:35 am

LukasBMW wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:
Wilber85 wrote:
Not going to lie, y'all are nuts. Kuzma was good on a crap team. He is not a starter IMO. He will be an amazing off the bench role player for many years to come on a good team.

If you can get Ball (Yes, I am a big hater of ball) I think he can become a pass first defensive PG that the suns need, and would be a good fit next to booker.
If kuzma is just a stats on a bad team guy then what does that say about any of the current suns?

Sent from my SM-G930V using RealGM mobile app


I'm also thinking about maturity and chemistry. Ball has his own TV show, shoe, and a crazy father. He raps like he is already a superstar. Don't want his circus or ego anywhere near this team. Booker and JJ are alpha and both get along. Ayton will fall in line and fit in. Don't need any new lions disrupting the food chain.


My problem with Ball is that his father is continuing to throw sh$t on the fire. You dont know if it Lavar or Lonzo who is saying but one thing is sure and tat it continues to stink and it is going to drive the team away.
Just say no to idiots!!
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,149
And1: 61,003
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1745 » by bwgood77 » Sun Jun 17, 2018 1:42 am

JMac1 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
JMac1 wrote:
I mean ha could reach Butler's ceiling moreso Leonard. I don't know even if he reaches his ceiling it will be Leonard, but if he does, it will definitely be Butler's.


While I don't like to put ceilings on people because the sky is the limit for pretty much anyone if they get to the NBA if they have the tools, I think Butler would be a nice ceiling.

I just really hope the shooting drastically improves this year, because it is very hard to be a real impact player if you can't at least stretch the floor to some extent and be respected by the defense. If he can get a good shot, he should end up being feared by the defense. I mean guys like Smart you can maybe call impact players, but people are already penciling JJ in as a Suns "big three" guy and a guy like Smart is far from that. So the shooting has to come. Luckily that is one thing Igor has helped people with. Maybe the hair cut helps too!



That's everything. I know this made Revived bemoan me, however, if JJ can shoot 75-80 from the line and 35-36 from three, he could surpass Booker as our best player if Booker doesn't tighten up his D. Also, if Ayton defense is a result of coaching and system and he improves, he could be our 1st or second option. I still have Bender at option 4 or 5 thru this year...

Booker's D
Josh's Shot
Bender's heart
Ayton's D......the good thing is it is just putting in the time. There are no limitations because lack of height, size or athletic ability holding any of them back.

Sounds like these guys need to go see the Wizard of OZ.


Oh yeah, if Booker doesn't get significantly better on D it will be hard for us to be a playoff contender with him as our best player. But theoretically JJ and Ayton came in way higher ranked...as far as who our best player is, or what order they are, they could end up in any order. Booker has exceeded expectations and JJ is behind his so far and Ayton is coming in with the highest expectations and highest rated player of the 3.
User avatar
thamadkant
Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
Posts: 16,916
And1: 8,599
Joined: Jan 06, 2007
 

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1746 » by thamadkant » Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:26 am

Suns / Blazers

Knight
Chandler
Dudley
Chriss
2018 Suns Pick 16
2019 Bucks Pick
2019 Suns Pick Top 3 protected
2021 Suns Pick Top 5 protected

for

Lillard
Leonard
Aminu


Helps Blazers get off some bad long term contracts, gives them some flexibility to re-load, make a run for Klay Thompson perhaps
AtheJ415
Head Coach
Posts: 6,581
And1: 5,560
Joined: Jul 07, 2014

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1747 » by AtheJ415 » Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:59 am

BobbieL wrote:
Kerrsed wrote:
BobbieL wrote:
I agree that the team needs to have the cap right for Booker Jackson and Ayton in four years

I also do think the players need to learn how to win games in the playoffs. I believe the Warriors got to the playoffss in 13 and 14 before going on this great run 15 -18. Yes, they had talent but they also made the playoffs and losing he;lped make them better. Trading for Bogut in 13, signing Iggy in 14. The Suns need that kind of move - a Bogut type signing this offseason.

So when I think of adding veterans - unless they are younger like Favors or Smart --- I am wanting veterans with two years left on their deals in most cases to help bridge the gap as Chriss, Bender, Jackson and Ayton mature. I don;'t know what Knight has left in the tank but with two years left on his deal - he fits that timeline. Maybe it seems stupid to give up a first round pick to help facilitate a move with Chandler or Dudleys contract but those things are spent money and would rather not extend the pain byt stretching those deals - plus the Suns don't need more rookies at this point

Its a fine line - I want my cake and eat it too - but I think this team needs win some games and push for the 8th spot this season. Not stupid long term signings - over pays on one years unless the right player comes along. Its why Dragic for two years - could be a very good option.


I still believe that if we cant find a way to trade up BEFORE the draft, we will end up making a trade with the Hornets for Kemba. I believe they are the ones that gave a promise to Shai and will be moving Walker. Will be around #16 & Warren. Warren is an upgrade over all their starting SF's, and Kemba is easily an upgrade over any PG that we have had in the past 7 years. Kemba gets paid about $250K more than Warren this upcoming season. Provides 20+ points, solid 3 point shooting, veteran playmaking and leadership, and decent defense for the PG position. I also believe will we end up using what capspace we have to go after a PF like Favors or Randle for semi cheap or McD may try to risk it for the biscuit and hit a grand slam by trying to sign Cousins.

Booker is expecting McD to go all out, and has repeated him numerous times in numerous interviews. Like it or not, Kemba would help in that aspect, and while some here clamber for Dragics return, the fact is that Kemba is younger, more easily attainable, and had a better season last year (Both offensively and Defensively) than Dragic. Kemba is an all-star now 2 years in a row, but will be looking for a major payday soon. But is that one addition enough for Booker and what he expects McD to do with all the BIG CHANGES talk? I dont think so, i think instead of using that capspace to take on a dead contract like Deng or Parsons for a pick, he is going to throw it at a guy like Cousins. While Gordons name has been thrown about a lot in regards to us, i think Orlando matches whatever he is offered 100% (Thank God). Cousins on the other hand is the mystery man. Coming back from injury, does the Pelicans sink that much money into retaining him, or spends that to improve their roster in other ways. Suns would be adding a great defender that can hit the 3 if need be, and one of the best passing bigs in the league (Averaging 5.5 Assists) to Igors pass heavy system. Either its going to be phenomenal...or its going to fail hard, its all depending on Cousins health.

But when all is said and done, this is the starting 5 i think McD will be going after: Kemba/Booker/Jackson/Cousins/Ayton. If it happens, it will be GLORIOUS.....or a trainwreck.


i have already stated what i think the Suns can give Kupchak that other teams might not be able to give - granted, I haven't studied others teams caps - but between expirings and non guaranteed contracts- Mitch can get both short and long term cap relief. plus the Suns can give 16 and Warren too and hell - possibly a pretty heavily protected first rounder of their own in 2019 - 2021

Out: Dudley, Warren, Williams, Ulis - 16 and if they want 31

In: Kemba and Marvin - would take Hermangomez but I doubt Mitch is giving up

Mitch can waive Williams and Ulis and save 7m right now; Dudley expiring where as Marvin is not so savings there - have picks 11, 16 and 31 to rebuild. Howard, Lamb and Dudley off books would create cap space


Sorry but that is a massive overpay for Kemba. PGs are not that valuable and only like 3 teams need a PG so we are basically bidding against ourselves, Orlando, and maybe Atlanta if they want to move Schroeder. Either of those other 2 are likely to take Trae Young, so why on earth are we taking bad salary in Marvin, while trading Warren, Ulis, and what is essentially 2 first rounders in 16 and 31? A star typically gets traded for 3 1sts and I would argue Kemba is not a star. He is a really good player but is only an all-star because he was in the East.

He is also an FA in a year and likely not to get the big payday he wants unless it is from Charlotte, so why would we dump all of that when we could sign him next offseason? I am okay with Warren, Ulis, and one of those picks IF we don't have to take Marvin back too. I don't see the point of taking Marvin because if we are taking on dead salary we might as well just make the Memphis trade or Laker trade and end up with one of Young, Doncic, or Ball, all of whom are probably more valuable than Kemba to a rebuilding team with players our ages.

Also, if we were to do that trade for Kemba, we are saying this year is when we try to contend, so keeping space to add more this offseason becomes more imperative. You can't lose all of that on Marvin Williams when you are already giving up a really good wing in Warren and 2 firsts.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1748 » by BobbieL » Sun Jun 17, 2018 3:58 am

AtheJ415 wrote:
BobbieL wrote:
Kerrsed wrote:
I still believe that if we cant find a way to trade up BEFORE the draft, we will end up making a trade with the Hornets for Kemba. I believe they are the ones that gave a promise to Shai and will be moving Walker. Will be around #16 & Warren. Warren is an upgrade over all their starting SF's, and Kemba is easily an upgrade over any PG that we have had in the past 7 years. Kemba gets paid about $250K more than Warren this upcoming season. Provides 20+ points, solid 3 point shooting, veteran playmaking and leadership, and decent defense for the PG position. I also believe will we end up using what capspace we have to go after a PF like Favors or Randle for semi cheap or McD may try to risk it for the biscuit and hit a grand slam by trying to sign Cousins.

Booker is expecting McD to go all out, and has repeated him numerous times in numerous interviews. Like it or not, Kemba would help in that aspect, and while some here clamber for Dragics return, the fact is that Kemba is younger, more easily attainable, and had a better season last year (Both offensively and Defensively) than Dragic. Kemba is an all-star now 2 years in a row, but will be looking for a major payday soon. But is that one addition enough for Booker and what he expects McD to do with all the BIG CHANGES talk? I dont think so, i think instead of using that capspace to take on a dead contract like Deng or Parsons for a pick, he is going to throw it at a guy like Cousins. While Gordons name has been thrown about a lot in regards to us, i think Orlando matches whatever he is offered 100% (Thank God). Cousins on the other hand is the mystery man. Coming back from injury, does the Pelicans sink that much money into retaining him, or spends that to improve their roster in other ways. Suns would be adding a great defender that can hit the 3 if need be, and one of the best passing bigs in the league (Averaging 5.5 Assists) to Igors pass heavy system. Either its going to be phenomenal...or its going to fail hard, its all depending on Cousins health.

But when all is said and done, this is the starting 5 i think McD will be going after: Kemba/Booker/Jackson/Cousins/Ayton. If it happens, it will be GLORIOUS.....or a trainwreck.


i have already stated what i think the Suns can give Kupchak that other teams might not be able to give - granted, I haven't studied others teams caps - but between expirings and non guaranteed contracts- Mitch can get both short and long term cap relief. plus the Suns can give 16 and Warren too and hell - possibly a pretty heavily protected first rounder of their own in 2019 - 2021

Out: Dudley, Warren, Williams, Ulis - 16 and if they want 31

In: Kemba and Marvin - would take Hermangomez but I doubt Mitch is giving up

Mitch can waive Williams and Ulis and save 7m right now; Dudley expiring where as Marvin is not so savings there - have picks 11, 16 and 31 to rebuild. Howard, Lamb and Dudley off books would create cap space


Sorry but that is a massive overpay for Kemba. PGs are not that valuable and only like 3 teams need a PG so we are basically bidding against ourselves, Orlando, and maybe Atlanta if they want to move Schroeder. Either of those other 2 are likely to take Trae Young, so why on earth are we taking bad salary in Marvin, while trading Warren, Ulis, and what is essentially 2 first rounders in 16 and 31? A star typically gets traded for 3 1sts and I would argue Kemba is not a star. He is a really good player but is only an all-star because he was in the East.

He is also an FA in a year and likely not to get the big payday he wants unless it is from Charlotte, so why would we dump all of that when we could sign him next offseason? I am okay with Warren, Ulis, and one of those picks IF we don't have to take Marvin back too. I don't see the point of taking Marvin because if we are taking on dead salary we might as well just make the Memphis trade or Laker trade and end up with one of Young, Doncic, or Ball, all of whom are probably more valuable than Kemba to a rebuilding team with players our ages.

Also, if we were to do that trade for Kemba, we are saying this year is when we try to contend, so keeping space to add more this offseason becomes more imperative. You can't lose all of that on Marvin Williams when you are already giving up a really good wing in Warren and 2 firsts.


the one area we may have commonality is that Kemba is only signed for one year. i don't think Warren and two picks is an overpay though. but pull back a pick - you are probably right there UNLESS Walker agreed to an extension

I am taking back Marvin because to me Dudley + Williams = 15m of wasted money. I think Williams would help more

part of this is because when Booker, IF he signs that extension the Suns cap room is not as good as one would think with Daniels, Chandler and Dudley expiring
AtheJ415
Head Coach
Posts: 6,581
And1: 5,560
Joined: Jul 07, 2014

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1749 » by AtheJ415 » Sun Jun 17, 2018 5:46 am

BobbieL wrote:
AtheJ415 wrote:
BobbieL wrote:
i have already stated what i think the Suns can give Kupchak that other teams might not be able to give - granted, I haven't studied others teams caps - but between expirings and non guaranteed contracts- Mitch can get both short and long term cap relief. plus the Suns can give 16 and Warren too and hell - possibly a pretty heavily protected first rounder of their own in 2019 - 2021

Out: Dudley, Warren, Williams, Ulis - 16 and if they want 31

In: Kemba and Marvin - would take Hermangomez but I doubt Mitch is giving up

Mitch can waive Williams and Ulis and save 7m right now; Dudley expiring where as Marvin is not so savings there - have picks 11, 16 and 31 to rebuild. Howard, Lamb and Dudley off books would create cap space


Sorry but that is a massive overpay for Kemba. PGs are not that valuable and only like 3 teams need a PG so we are basically bidding against ourselves, Orlando, and maybe Atlanta if they want to move Schroeder. Either of those other 2 are likely to take Trae Young, so why on earth are we taking bad salary in Marvin, while trading Warren, Ulis, and what is essentially 2 first rounders in 16 and 31? A star typically gets traded for 3 1sts and I would argue Kemba is not a star. He is a really good player but is only an all-star because he was in the East.

He is also an FA in a year and likely not to get the big payday he wants unless it is from Charlotte, so why would we dump all of that when we could sign him next offseason? I am okay with Warren, Ulis, and one of those picks IF we don't have to take Marvin back too. I don't see the point of taking Marvin because if we are taking on dead salary we might as well just make the Memphis trade or Laker trade and end up with one of Young, Doncic, or Ball, all of whom are probably more valuable than Kemba to a rebuilding team with players our ages.

Also, if we were to do that trade for Kemba, we are saying this year is when we try to contend, so keeping space to add more this offseason becomes more imperative. You can't lose all of that on Marvin Williams when you are already giving up a really good wing in Warren and 2 firsts.


the one area we may have commonality is that Kemba is only signed for one year. i don't think Warren and two picks is an overpay though. but pull back a pick - you are probably right there UNLESS Walker agreed to an extension

I am taking back Marvin because to me Dudley + Williams = 15m of wasted money. I think Williams would help more

part of this is because when Booker, IF he signs that extension the Suns cap room is not as good as one would think with Daniels, Chandler and Dudley expiring


I just really value 31. This is a deep draft, and I look at a guy like Shamet or Khyri Thomas who will both probably be there at 31, and i add them to 16, and Warren is a 3 point shot away from being arguably as good as Kemba. I get the trade, but I would pull back a pick. I think for a point guard who isn't an MVP candidate and for a team that needs wings, Warren and 16 ought to be enough.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1750 » by BobbieL » Sun Jun 17, 2018 1:30 pm

AtheJ415 wrote:
BobbieL wrote:
AtheJ415 wrote:
Sorry but that is a massive overpay for Kemba. PGs are not that valuable and only like 3 teams need a PG so we are basically bidding against ourselves, Orlando, and maybe Atlanta if they want to move Schroeder. Either of those other 2 are likely to take Trae Young, so why on earth are we taking bad salary in Marvin, while trading Warren, Ulis, and what is essentially 2 first rounders in 16 and 31? A star typically gets traded for 3 1sts and I would argue Kemba is not a star. He is a really good player but is only an all-star because he was in the East.

He is also an FA in a year and likely not to get the big payday he wants unless it is from Charlotte, so why would we dump all of that when we could sign him next offseason? I am okay with Warren, Ulis, and one of those picks IF we don't have to take Marvin back too. I don't see the point of taking Marvin because if we are taking on dead salary we might as well just make the Memphis trade or Laker trade and end up with one of Young, Doncic, or Ball, all of whom are probably more valuable than Kemba to a rebuilding team with players our ages.

Also, if we were to do that trade for Kemba, we are saying this year is when we try to contend, so keeping space to add more this offseason becomes more imperative. You can't lose all of that on Marvin Williams when you are already giving up a really good wing in Warren and 2 firsts.


the one area we may have commonality is that Kemba is only signed for one year. i don't think Warren and two picks is an overpay though. but pull back a pick - you are probably right there UNLESS Walker agreed to an extension

I am taking back Marvin because to me Dudley + Williams = 15m of wasted money. I think Williams would help more

part of this is because when Booker, IF he signs that extension the Suns cap room is not as good as one would think with Daniels, Chandler and Dudley expiring


I just really value 31. This is a deep draft, and I look at a guy like Shamet or Khyri Thomas who will both probably be there at 31, and i add them to 16, and Warren is a 3 point shot away from being arguably as good as Kemba. I get the trade, but I would pull back a pick. I think for a point guard who isn't an MVP candidate and for a team that needs wings, Warren and 16 ought to be enough.


I just am not sure the Suns roster will be at its best with 3 more rookies. That said,i don't want dumb trades for the sake of not drafting them. I don't want them to sell off either 31 or 59 - because a team like the Warriors have made very good use of those second round picks.

At this point - I will agree with you - optimum for me
use picks 1 and 31; 59 is draft and stash
16 is used to upgrade the roster type trade for veteran
JMac1
Suns Forum Training Specialist
Posts: 10,032
And1: 4,004
Joined: May 23, 2009

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1751 » by JMac1 » Sun Jun 17, 2018 1:44 pm

BobbieL wrote:
AtheJ415 wrote:
BobbieL wrote:
the one area we may have commonality is that Kemba is only signed for one year. i don't think Warren and two picks is an overpay though. but pull back a pick - you are probably right there UNLESS Walker agreed to an extension

I am taking back Marvin because to me Dudley + Williams = 15m of wasted money. I think Williams would help more

part of this is because when Booker, IF he signs that extension the Suns cap room is not as good as one would think with Daniels, Chandler and Dudley expiring


I just really value 31. This is a deep draft, and I look at a guy like Shamet or Khyri Thomas who will both probably be there at 31, and i add them to 16, and Warren is a 3 point shot away from being arguably as good as Kemba. I get the trade, but I would pull back a pick. I think for a point guard who isn't an MVP candidate and for a team that needs wings, Warren and 16 ought to be enough.


I just am not sure the Suns roster will be at its best with 3 more rookies. That said,i don't want dumb trades for the sake of not drafting them. I don't want them to sell off either 31 or 59 - because a team like the Warriors have made very good use of those second round picks.

At this point - I will agree with you - optimum for me
use picks 1 and 31; 59 is draft and stash
16 is used to upgrade the roster type trade for veteran


In all the hoopla, I never thought about that. Someone that we are considering at 16 is falling to 31, trading 16 and keeping 31 is not a bad move. Or take BPA at 16, and if there isn't much separation between the guy you picked at 16 and number 31, then trade 16 draft rights for a vet.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1752 » by BobbieL » Sun Jun 17, 2018 1:51 pm

JMac1 wrote:
BobbieL wrote:
AtheJ415 wrote:
I just really value 31. This is a deep draft, and I look at a guy like Shamet or Khyri Thomas who will both probably be there at 31, and i add them to 16, and Warren is a 3 point shot away from being arguably as good as Kemba. I get the trade, but I would pull back a pick. I think for a point guard who isn't an MVP candidate and for a team that needs wings, Warren and 16 ought to be enough.


I just am not sure the Suns roster will be at its best with 3 more rookies. That said,i don't want dumb trades for the sake of not drafting them. I don't want them to sell off either 31 or 59 - because a team like the Warriors have made very good use of those second round picks.

At this point - I will agree with you - optimum for me
use picks 1 and 31; 59 is draft and stash
16 is used to upgrade the roster type trade for veteran


In all the hoopla, I never thought about that. Someone that we are considering is falling to 31, trading 16 and keeping 31 is not a bad move. Take BPA there. Or take 16, the guy you like better and 31, if they are close in talent then trade 16 draft rights for a vet.


I am also okay using 31 to move up to say 14 and pick the RIGHT guy

my thing with the second rounder - and it still irks me is Jordan Bell. he is to me a smart second rounder. i know he played for the Warriors so for him, the focus is so much on the other guys its easy to hang around the rum , get dunks etc

but what he is - a guy that doesn't need the ball to make plays. i don't want some high upside player with 31 that just sits on the pine. find a guy that can do one thing. is it hustle, defend the perimeter, shoot three points, rebound. i know i am being overly simplistic but get a dirt worker with that 31 - can always use defense and hustle
JMac1
Suns Forum Training Specialist
Posts: 10,032
And1: 4,004
Joined: May 23, 2009

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1753 » by JMac1 » Sun Jun 17, 2018 1:54 pm

BobbieL wrote:
JMac1 wrote:
BobbieL wrote:
I just am not sure the Suns roster will be at its best with 3 more rookies. That said,i don't want dumb trades for the sake of not drafting them. I don't want them to sell off either 31 or 59 - because a team like the Warriors have made very good use of those second round picks.

At this point - I will agree with you - optimum for me
use picks 1 and 31; 59 is draft and stash
16 is used to upgrade the roster type trade for veteran


In all the hoopla, I never thought about that. Someone that we are considering is falling to 31, trading 16 and keeping 31 is not a bad move. Take BPA there. Or take 16, the guy you like better and 31, if they are close in talent then trade 16 draft rights for a vet.


I am also okay using 31 to move up to say 14 and pick the RIGHT guy

my thing with the second rounder - and it still irks me is Jordan Bell. he is to me a smart second rounder. i know he played for the Warriors so for him, the focus is so much on the other guys its easy to hang around the rum , get dunks etc

but what he is - a guy that doesn't need the ball to make plays. i don't want some high upside player with 31 that just sits on the pine. find a guy that can do one thing. is it hustle, defend the perimeter, shoot three points, rebound. i know i am being overly simplistic but get a dirt worker with that 31 - can always use defense and hustle


Code for Grayson Allen :lol: I understand what you saying, but if a stud is at 31, you still take the stud. I would never draft a lesser player.
Kjdills13
Sophomore
Posts: 195
And1: 86
Joined: Jul 09, 2014

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1754 » by Kjdills13 » Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:19 pm

Guys if we can trade for Lonzo Ball and not sell the farm we need to do it. He wasn’t a great shooter. It he is a long , pg who averaged 10,7,7 as a rookie. He is going to be a guy who averages around a triple double the rest of his career.
BobbieL
RealGM
Posts: 15,353
And1: 8,997
Joined: Jun 24, 2009

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1755 » by BobbieL » Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:36 pm

JMac1 wrote:
BobbieL wrote:
JMac1 wrote:
In all the hoopla, I never thought about that. Someone that we are considering is falling to 31, trading 16 and keeping 31 is not a bad move. Take BPA there. Or take 16, the guy you like better and 31, if they are close in talent then trade 16 draft rights for a vet.


I am also okay using 31 to move up to say 14 and pick the RIGHT guy

my thing with the second rounder - and it still irks me is Jordan Bell. he is to me a smart second rounder. i know he played for the Warriors so for him, the focus is so much on the other guys its easy to hang around the rum , get dunks etc

but what he is - a guy that doesn't need the ball to make plays. i don't want some high upside player with 31 that just sits on the pine. find a guy that can do one thing. is it hustle, defend the perimeter, shoot three points, rebound. i know i am being overly simplistic but get a dirt worker with that 31 - can always use defense and hustle


Code for Grayson Allen :lol: I understand what you saying, but if a stud is at 31, you still take the stud. I would never draft a lesser player.


I agree - if a stud falls -even at 31 if a draft and stash stud - take him

What I don't want at 31 is Archie Goodwin - a project. Grayson would not be a project - he has a skill to be use. Rawle Alkins - I see a little of James Posey - so a skill. I think BWG mentioned a Gary Clark - or something like that. Igor I think is a good coach - find a guy that Igor can incorporate into the rotation
User avatar
King4Day
RealGM
Posts: 13,613
And1: 9,822
Joined: Dec 11, 2010
Location: Pandora
         

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1756 » by King4Day » Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:43 pm

With the rumor that Ball would potentially go to Cleveland in a deal (sign and trade) for LeBron, if the Cavs didn't want him, what would you offer to Cleveland to get him in a 3 way deal? Maybe a future protected 1st? Or the 16 and Bucks pick (depending on what his value is like right now)?
"Sometimes, the dragon wins" #RallyTheValley
AtheJ415
Head Coach
Posts: 6,581
And1: 5,560
Joined: Jul 07, 2014

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1757 » by AtheJ415 » Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:52 pm

Kjdills13 wrote:Guys if we can trade for Lonzo Ball and not sell the farm we need to do it. He wasn’t a great shooter. It he is a long , pg who averaged 10,7,7 as a rookie. He is going to be a guy who averages around a triple double the rest of his career.


Wasn't a great shooter is a drastic understatement. Dude shot 45% from the free throw line as a point guard. You have to have faith that he improves to an average shooter. I think that's a 50/50 proposition at this point.

I am interested in Ball regardless because he proved to be a capable defender and does other things really well, but his shooting is a major concern. I would consider taking Deng for him, but only if we can't get Memphis for #4 and Parsons, because I think #4 will have one of Doncic or Young, who I value as much or more than Ball, and Parsons I think is less of dead weight than Deng. Plus you get an extra year of rookie control since Ball is about to be a sophomore. And you then don't have to deal with his family.

That said, if we can't get one of those guys I would strongly consider it. Ball is a good fit with this unit. Not many teams will want to deal with his family's headache and Lonzo's shooting probably will scare others off. Plus, not many can take Deng. We could with some moderate moves.
AtheJ415
Head Coach
Posts: 6,581
And1: 5,560
Joined: Jul 07, 2014

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1758 » by AtheJ415 » Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:54 pm

DarkHawk wrote:With the rumor that Ball would potentially go to Cleveland in a deal (sign and trade) for LeBron, if the Cavs didn't want him, what would you offer to Cleveland to get him in a 3 way deal? Maybe a future protected 1st? Or the 16 and Bucks pick (depending on what his value is like right now)?


The thing is, I'm not sure why Lebron would opt in. I mean truthfully I don't think he cares all that much about Lonzo. I think he cares much more about getting cap space to pick other guys to play with (Leonard, PG, Paul, whoever), so he probably wants Deng dropped, and Ball is the carrot for that to happen.

I'd ask for Ingram and would be willing to take Deng and add something for Ingram. I would offer nothing more than taking Deng for Ball. That is a lot of cap space to assign to a corpse and thus I think that is fair. Russell got barely more for a contract that was not as bad, but Russell had proven a lot more than Ball at that point.
AtheJ415
Head Coach
Posts: 6,581
And1: 5,560
Joined: Jul 07, 2014

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1759 » by AtheJ415 » Sun Jun 17, 2018 2:58 pm

BobbieL wrote:
JMac1 wrote:
BobbieL wrote:
I am also okay using 31 to move up to say 14 and pick the RIGHT guy

my thing with the second rounder - and it still irks me is Jordan Bell. he is to me a smart second rounder. i know he played for the Warriors so for him, the focus is so much on the other guys its easy to hang around the rum , get dunks etc

but what he is - a guy that doesn't need the ball to make plays. i don't want some high upside player with 31 that just sits on the pine. find a guy that can do one thing. is it hustle, defend the perimeter, shoot three points, rebound. i know i am being overly simplistic but get a dirt worker with that 31 - can always use defense and hustle


Code for Grayson Allen :lol: I understand what you saying, but if a stud is at 31, you still take the stud. I would never draft a lesser player.


I agree - if a stud falls -even at 31 if a draft and stash stud - take him

What I don't want at 31 is Archie Goodwin - a project. Grayson would not be a project - he has a skill to be use. Rawle Alkins - I see a little of James Posey - so a skill. I think BWG mentioned a Gary Clark - or something like that. Igor I think is a good coach - find a guy that Igor can incorporate into the rotation


I think odds are really good that one of Shamet, Huerter, Khyri Thomas, or Okobo falls there. Any of those could really help us, and imo none are projects in the Goodwin manner. If we're going after Clark I think we could get him later and thus should trade down if that is the target.
Sunsdeuce
Head Coach
Posts: 6,523
And1: 3,091
Joined: Jan 22, 2012
       

Re: Almost off-season discussion! Trades/Free Agency Ep. 9 

Post#1760 » by Sunsdeuce » Sun Jun 17, 2018 3:37 pm

This is what we are up against people. Good god Lakers fans are delusional!!!!!

From the Lakers Forum. Their trade thread. Ball is a decent talent with a major weakness (shooting) that is (one of)most important parts of being a PG. he is no where near Simmons talent as well. Madness from that fan base. He’s got trade value but no where near what they think and with his family also not helping his cause, going to be tough getting much back for Ball.

I’d be hesitant to trade the #16 pick for Ball.

mcscotty wrote:I see Lonzo as a Ben Simmons level talent. It would take something collasal for the Lakers to ever consider parting ways with him, and if any team is lucky enough to acquire him, they almost certainly won't regret it. The Spurs might be saying they have no interest in Ball, but I'm not buying that for one minute.
I am such a lucky NBA fan. 8647 My favorite team went from the most greedy and racist owner to the most ego driven dumbass owner in all of sports fdt.

Only a fan of Arizona teams!
Cardinals
Dbacks
Suns

Return to Phoenix Suns