Bjorpa wrote:TheLogician wrote:Bjorpa wrote:
The draft analysts Like Givony, Kevin O'Connor, the staff at TheStepien, also need people to return to their sites.
If they hype unwarranted prospects people would stop valuing their opinion, so i feel your point is a bit simplistic.
I feel the difference between evaluators is more on what they value the most, just like with us. Some value build/athleticism the most (potential), some value production, some value shooting, defence or BBIQ. We all value a combination, but emphasize different traits.
Those guys do hype unwarranted prospects every year and many fans don't value their opinions as a result. Again, I'm not saying Doncic doesn't deserve attention and appreciation. It's the over-the-top adulation from professionals that I'm criticizing.
I agree. All the outlets do.
Last year Ball got alot of hype in the main outlets, while Fultz was the darling of DraftXpress, The Stepien, etc. Almost no one had Mitchell or Tatum being as good as they are.
The year before was a weak draft. many were hyping Bender as second to Simmons, which seems a mistake now. Very few had Brown as a top 4 prospect.
Before that, most had KAT as #1, while some had Okafor as an outsider. Many predicted Porzingis as a bust. Mudiay and Winslow were also hyped up.
It's not an exact science.
Yep, they all do it to some extent. And people will keep clicking their mocks and listening to their speculation because we all love basketball.