3toheadmelo wrote:Dwight about to buy out of his contract. interesting
do you blame them? They don't want anyone poisoning Allen or getting in the way of his minutes...
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85

3toheadmelo wrote:Dwight about to buy out of his contract. interesting
3toheadmelo wrote:Dwight about to buy out of his contract. interesting
BLACKFEET 2010 wrote:Juco24 wrote:BLACKFEET 2010 wrote:Watching Knox vs. Schofield now.
Thoughts?
I'm on board with Knox.
Drafting him is betting on Fiz because he needs to be coached.
He has a sweet shot with range, despite the mediocre percentages.
Really good in transition doing it himself or as a target.
Really creative around the rim in traffic. Natural born scorer. Smooth athlete.
Doesn't move the needle defensively and I don't know if he has any passing ability.
It's clear he's a few years away from even figuring out how good he can be and being comfortable in his body.
Has a lot to tighten up on but he has all the tools to be a very good player.
FrontOfficeEye wrote:MPJr’s talent was always overrated, IMO. If he were a HS SR now, he wouldn’t be top 10 (maybe not even close to it). TBH, he shouldn’t even have been ranked highly in his own class, even without hindsight.
3toheadmelo wrote:Dwight about to buy out of his contract. interesting
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
SmoothLefty21 wrote:FrontOfficeEye wrote:MPJr’s talent was always overrated, IMO. If he were a HS SR now, he wouldn’t be top 10 (maybe not even close to it). TBH, he shouldn’t even have been ranked highly in his own class, even without hindsight.
It's true. His HS tapes aren't that impressive. He basically got by by being a half a foot taller than everyone guarding him and he shoots over the top. He had way too much trouble creating space/separation at the HS level. His athleticism was apparent in space but he didn't use it in traffic very well/often.
I don't know why this is such a hot take to people, damn near every year there's a massively overrated prospect. We've been at this for over two decades; HS rankings barely mean a thing.
SARGO127 wrote:
I'd rather have him than Knox tbh
SGA/Frank is a nice lengthy backcourt.
fatalogic wrote:DraftExpress is releasing all their videos on youtube right now
Here is Knox:
FrontOfficeEye wrote:BLACKFEET 2010 wrote:Juco24 wrote:Thoughts?
I'm on board with Knox.
Drafting him is betting on Fiz because he needs to be coached.
He has a sweet shot with range, despite the mediocre percentages.
Really good in transition doing it himself or as a target.
Really creative around the rim in traffic. Natural born scorer. Smooth athlete.
Doesn't move the needle defensively and I don't know if he has any passing ability.
It's clear he's a few years away from even figuring out how good he can be and being comfortable in his body.
Has a lot to tighten up on but he has all the tools to be a very good player.
- The form looks nice, but the percentages weren't there even on OPEN looks. Again, 57th percentile in unguarded situations is bad.
- 55% finishing at the rim in the half court, and no left hand to speak of. His right hand is even poor, with him missing shots either because of poor touch or because he's afraid to get hit. (62nd percentile around basket.) Literally no idea where you're getting this creativity from. He has a nice floater, sure, but he uses it WAY too much. 16% of his possessions in the half court were floaters, vs 18 attacking the rim...that's bad shot IQ. .3 higher PPP attacking the rim with a FTR that is double, but he kept going to the floater.
- 49th percentile in transition was a turnover machine in transition. 19% turnover rate, 23 as lead guy, 13 and 27 on the wings.
- Bad defender with very questionable awareness, but he does fine in isolation situations.
- No handle (especially with his left hand, which is why he would not only SHIELD guys with his right hand, but PUSH OFF... and poor passing feel.
FrontOfficeEye wrote:Nyk_Fatboy wrote:At the very least knox will be a 3/D that can play either sf/pf basically the same sh*t as mikal how does he have a good chance of busting lol
But he’s not a good defender, and he was in the 44th percentile in catch and shoot situations (including only 57th in UNGUARDED situations). Him becoming a 3/D guy is far from certain.
BLACKFEET 2010 wrote:FrontOfficeEye wrote:BLACKFEET 2010 wrote:I'm on board with Knox.
Drafting him is betting on Fiz because he needs to be coached.
He has a sweet shot with range, despite the mediocre percentages.
Really good in transition doing it himself or as a target.
Really creative around the rim in traffic. Natural born scorer. Smooth athlete.
Doesn't move the needle defensively and I don't know if he has any passing ability.
It's clear he's a few years away from even figuring out how good he can be and being comfortable in his body.
Has a lot to tighten up on but he has all the tools to be a very good player.
- The form looks nice, but the percentages weren't there even on OPEN looks. Again, 57th percentile in unguarded situations is bad.
- 55% finishing at the rim in the half court, and no left hand to speak of. His right hand is even poor, with him missing shots either because of poor touch or because he's afraid to get hit. (62nd percentile around basket.) Literally no idea where you're getting this creativity from. He has a nice floater, sure, but he uses it WAY too much. 16% of his possessions in the half court were floaters, vs 18 attacking the rim...that's bad shot IQ. .3 higher PPP attacking the rim with a FTR that is double, but he kept going to the floater.
- 49th percentile in transition was a turnover machine in transition. 19% turnover rate, 23 as lead guy, 13 and 27 on the wings.
- Bad defender with very questionable awareness, but he does fine in isolation situations.
- No handle (especially with his left hand, which is why he would not only SHIELD guys with his right hand, but PUSH OFF... and poor passing feel.
18 tho.