Jeff Van Gully wrote:KnickLeDime wrote:FrontOfficeEye wrote:
Last year, soph year, or freshman. He barely played as a freshman, but I can pull whatever.
Ayton is going #1 because he is skilled offensively and the body and athleticism to match. I think he's a terrible defender, but part of me thinks it is because he was playing the 4 instead of the 5 last year.
I don't think Knox is finished at all. I just don't think he's this great well rounded prospect many people think he is.
It's player tracking numbers, not any advanced metric. Highlights can make anyone look good.
I was looking for advanced metrics, comparison of freshman Mikal vs freshman Knox. I know there may be a significant disperity between time played. Just wanted to see how they stacked up freshman on freshman/apples to apples.
as i got to the end i was thinking just how NOT apples to apples that comparison would be. different teams. different systems. different roles.
Your objection is noted but indulge me...




































