ImageImageImage

2018 Draft Prospects

Moderator: THE J0KER

skywalker33
Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 14,089
And1: 5,449
Joined: Jun 02, 2014
       

Re: 2018 Draft Prospects 

Post#341 » by skywalker33 » Fri Jun 22, 2018 2:44 am

THE J0KER wrote:Phonex with J.Jackson and M.Bridges SF's don't need at all anymore T.J.Warren. I would offer for him 2019 1st and Lyles/or/Juancho. Once Porter be ready for starter SF job and Millsap is gone, Warren can be our PF starter, or maybe Porter will be able to play PF.


I'd consider the #1 but they've put themselves in a position of weakness, devaluing Warren, why not exploit that ?? Adding either Lyles or Juancho seems overpay IMO, especially when they'll be a playoff rival in a couple of years.
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose


Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
User avatar
THE J0KER
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Posts: 7,411
And1: 6,811
Joined: Apr 12, 2017
 

Re: 2018 Draft Prospects 

Post#342 » by THE J0KER » Fri Jun 22, 2018 2:51 am

skywalker33 wrote:
THE J0KER wrote:Phonex with J.Jackson and M.Bridges SF's don't need at all anymore T.J.Warren. I would offer for him 2019 1st and Lyles/or/Juancho. Once Porter be ready for starter SF job and Millsap is gone, Warren can be our PF starter, or maybe Porter will be able to play PF.


I'd consider the #1 but they've put themselves in a position of weakness, devaluing Warren, why not exploit that ?? Adding either Lyles or Juancho seems overpay IMO, especially when they'll be a playoff rival in a couple of years.

His price will remain big because he is under a 4-year team-friendly 45M/4 deal... unlike Lyles and Juancho where no guarantee that they are going to stay after 2019
skywalker33
Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 14,089
And1: 5,449
Joined: Jun 02, 2014
       

Re: 2018 Draft Prospects 

Post#343 » by skywalker33 » Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:02 am

THE J0KER wrote:
skywalker33 wrote:
THE J0KER wrote:Phonex with J.Jackson and M.Bridges SF's don't need at all anymore T.J.Warren. I would offer for him 2019 1st and Lyles/or/Juancho. Once Porter be ready for starter SF job and Millsap is gone, Warren can be our PF starter, or maybe Porter will be able to play PF.


I'd consider the #1 but they've put themselves in a position of weakness, devaluing Warren, why not exploit that ?? Adding either Lyles or Juancho seems overpay IMO, especially when they'll be a playoff rival in a couple of years.

His price will remain big because he is under a 4-year team-friendly 45M/4 deal... unlike Lyles and Juancho where no guarantee that they are going to stay after 2019


So do you think they'll want to pay $11M to a 3rd string SF ??
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose


Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
User avatar
THE J0KER
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Posts: 7,411
And1: 6,811
Joined: Apr 12, 2017
 

Re: 2018 Draft Prospects 

Post#344 » by THE J0KER » Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:06 am

Don't forget that we are not the only team in NBA which need such player, and his contract is really team-friendly.
skywalker33
Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 14,089
And1: 5,449
Joined: Jun 02, 2014
       

Re: 2018 Draft Prospects 

Post#345 » by skywalker33 » Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:43 am

KBD to the T-Pups, bummer
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose


Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
SoCalNuggsFan
Senior
Posts: 749
And1: 440
Joined: Nov 14, 2009

Re: 2018 Draft Prospects 

Post#346 » by SoCalNuggsFan » Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:45 am

I see no reason to pay a non 3 pt shooting, no defense playing SF 12 mil a year for 4 years. Wouldn’t take him in a trade for a top 55 protected pick.
skywalker33
Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 14,089
And1: 5,449
Joined: Jun 02, 2014
       

Re: 2018 Draft Prospects 

Post#347 » by skywalker33 » Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:47 am

THE J0KER wrote:Don't forget that we are not the only team in NBA which need such player, and his contract is really team-friendly.


So if you think $11M is team friendly, why is Faried and his $13M expiring considered such negative value ??
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose


Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
User avatar
THE J0KER
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Posts: 7,411
And1: 6,811
Joined: Apr 12, 2017
 

Re: 2018 Draft Prospects 

Post#348 » by THE J0KER » Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:57 am

skywalker33 wrote:
THE J0KER wrote:Don't forget that we are not the only team in NBA which need such player, and his contract is really team-friendly.


So if you think $11M is team friendly, why is Faried and his $13M expiring considered such negative value ??

We talking here about 24y old player after his 21 ppg season, unlike declining Faried. I can't see here connection, TJWarren is a real asset.
skywalker33
Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 14,089
And1: 5,449
Joined: Jun 02, 2014
       

Re: 2018 Draft Prospects 

Post#349 » by skywalker33 » Fri Jun 22, 2018 4:07 am

THE J0KER wrote:
skywalker33 wrote:
THE J0KER wrote:Don't forget that we are not the only team in NBA which need such player, and his contract is really team-friendly.


So if you think $11M is team friendly, why is Faried and his $13M expiring considered such negative value ??

We talking here about 24y old player after his 21 ppg season, unlike declining Faried. I can't see here connection, TJWarren is a real asset.


Then why did PHX draft SF's in consecutive years....because he was irreplaceable ? And 21ppg on a bad team doesn't seem all-to-impressive to me, the guy played the same defense as Faried, so there's one correlation. And Faried is only 28, not like he's over the hill
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose


Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
User avatar
THE J0KER
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Forum Mod - Nuggets
Posts: 7,411
And1: 6,811
Joined: Apr 12, 2017
 

Re: 2018 Draft Prospects 

Post#350 » by THE J0KER » Fri Jun 22, 2018 4:11 am

I didn't say he is "irreplaceable", just that he is very tradable with good trade value (unfortunately for teams which want to trade him).
skywalker33
Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 14,089
And1: 5,449
Joined: Jun 02, 2014
       

Re: 2018 Draft Prospects 

Post#351 » by skywalker33 » Fri Jun 22, 2018 4:17 am

And I'm not saying not to trade for him, I just don't want to overpay for him.
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose


Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
U hova
Pro Prospect
Posts: 832
And1: 481
Joined: Jul 02, 2013
 

Re: 2018 Draft Prospects 

Post#352 » by U hova » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:14 pm

never forget we're paying a bench player 14 million per year
NuggetsWY
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,390
And1: 4,124
Joined: Oct 28, 2015
Location: Cheyenne, WY
 

Re: 2018 Draft Prospects 

Post#353 » by NuggetsWY » Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:29 pm

U hova wrote:never forget we're paying a bench player 14 million per year

More like we are paying bench non-player 14m per year
The Rebel
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,186
And1: 11,359
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
 

Re: 2018 Draft Prospects 

Post#354 » by The Rebel » Sat Jun 23, 2018 2:01 pm

THE J0KER wrote:I didn't say he is "irreplaceable", just that he is very tradable with good trade value (unfortunately for teams which want to trade him).


I like Warren, but if you think Juancho and POrter JR are going to work out, than you cannot trade for Warren with that contract, his role will be minimal in a year and you will be trying to dump that contract to clear the cap space you will need.

Return to Denver Nuggets