bad knees wrote:I just read in KC’s article in the hard copy Chicago Tribune that the Bulls declined to trade up with MEM because “the Bulls weren’t interested in swallowing the two years and $49 million remaining on Chandler Parsons’ contract.”
Make me barf. We’d rather spend that cap space on what - overpaying LaVine and then overpaying Portis?
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Well, for whatever it's worth it was a tough choice because WCJ wasn't a wash-over prospect. There is a realistic chance he outplays Bamba, JJJ, Bagley and even Ayton, as far as big men go. Probably not, but it's tough trading up when that chance exists.
IMO Doncic would've been worth it but, but between JJJ and Bamba, you can't dump that much cap flexibility for a high-reward/high-risk trade, especially since it was a choice of big men. If athletic/skilled wings were on the table, it'd be a different conversation.
Ultimately "losing" MPJ's ceiling as a top prospect to injury was a big blow to this draft. IMO it went from 8-deep to 7, and that hurt our options considering we're 7. Especially sucked for CLE.
I'm a little bummed about how plain the draft went, but at the same time, it's OK. Both the CHI and NOP picks were lower than we would've liked, but that's why you don't count a "tank top-3 pick" as a piece of an all-star trade (I'm gonna continue rubbing it in, in response to the ridiculous talking point from all the pro-Jimmy trade people last year).
We are in a bit of a dangerous position because we have a deep roster with no legitimate all-star, let alone a superstar/top-10 type. In many ways, soft rebuilding around Jimmy and parts would've been a comparable scenario to what we've got right now. I mean, besides Lauri M., none of the assets we've acquired are "untouchable". You could've acquired 8.1 PER Dunn, ACL/RFA Zach, Chandler Hutchinson (and so on) with the assets we had... and the cap was going to completely clear up the next 2 summers with Wade/Rondo/RoLo coming off the books. AFAIC it's basically
Jimmy vs. Lauri. I'll let LM's sophomore season answer that debate.
But on the flip side, if we atleast look like a team that has fun playing with each other, Lauri/Carter work as a tandem, Dunn takes a step, and Hutchinson proves to be a starter... then I won't complain. I seriously think we're a 1st round team with arguable 2nd rd. potential depending on the draw. It's basically like the 04/05 Bulls team right now. We have a lot of NBA-ready youth and prime player depth, and it's a deep roster. Not gonna get far, but and the future cap situation is unsustainable once extensions kick in, but that's the team GarPax seem to like.