potatoaim wrote:Snakebites wrote:potatoaim wrote:
What do you expect him to say? "We're ****, so you might as well just go home"...Some people on this board just need to enjoy this for what it is. This isnt the NFL where 20-25 teams have realistic shot to make some serious noise any given season. The NBA is a 5 team league. Always has been, always will be. Detroit obviously isnt one of those 5 and probably never will be one because they will never attract marque FAs. So not signing Leuer/Galloway, not trading for Griffin etc. wasnt going to expedite the process of becoming one of those 5.
This is easily the strangest argument I've ever seen on these forums.
Just because we're on the outside looking in as far as winning a championship and are very likely to be in the foreseeable future doesn't mean bad moves don't matter, doesn't mean we shouldn't be upset if the team is making moves that are bad for the health of the team moving forward, and it doesn't mean we shouldn't want the people running the team to try and build a young core that's in line with the evolution of the game and fun to watch.
If nothing matters why bother with any of this?
People can discuss what they want, but acting like signing Leuer/Galloway hindered this teams ability to compete for a championship over the length of their contracts is just silly. What else would they have done with the money? What were they going to do with the Griffen $ had they not made the deal? This board whines about "financial flexibility"...ok...Financial flexibility to do what exactly? Sign Lebron and Paul George? Or any other top level FA? Or maybe they could of kept Harris and traded him for Leonard this summer and then signed him to a max extension. LOL C'mon...
Overpaying for role players isnt an "SVG thing" its a "The only type of FA that would even consider signing with Detroit is a role player and thats only if hes grossly overpaid" kind of thing. Trust me, Im no fan of SVG, but Stefanski/whoever the **** the GM is is going to have the same exact problems.
Like I said, this is the NBA, there is no parity here. The Pistons, along with 25 or so other teams, are just chum for the sharks. The sooner people accept that and enjoy this for what it is, the better off they will be.
Most of us aren't talking about a championship.
We're talking about making smart moves and trying to build a young core with upside that fits with the modern NBA, rather than an expensive veteran team who's model is years out of date and has little room for improvement. That discussion has merit, and right now the team isn't doing a good job at all.
Those things matter, whether the league as a whole has parity or not. We want a good team that's run in an intelligent way. You don't need to be in an elite market to get that, and the conversation about whether or not you can win a title can't even start until you have that in place.
It just feels like you're arguing with a strawman here.