Phish Tank wrote:this is all speculation by Berman. Don't read into it too much
Or just don’t read berman
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
Phish Tank wrote:this is all speculation by Berman. Don't read into it too much
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
Jeff Van Gully wrote:i had every intention on reading this, but had to close the window on principle after the opening sentence.
nah, homie. not me.
KnicksGod wrote:magnumt wrote:
This is why!
This alone tells me that at JUST 18 years old this guys was lighting it up! Can you imagine him on the Fastbreak with Prince Frank, Porzingis & the other youngin's!![]()
--Mags
You gotta love that he’s wearing a Knicks pin.
stuporman wrote:Jeff Van Gully wrote:i had every intention on reading this, but had to close the window on principle after the opening sentence.
nah, homie. not me.
He got your click, mission accomplished, he doesn't really care about being read.
stuporman wrote:whocares1 wrote:stuporman wrote:
As if there isn't a more prominent community of angst ridden nihilists that act the very same way you described except they're preaching a hopeless pessimistic hell that they would save us from if we just believe their infallible basketball opinions......
To be fair, Positive fans are positive every season. Negative fans are also negative every season. Every season the Knicks suck or have done something embarrassing that plunges the franchise to new lows so if you think about it, the negative fans have been right since like 2013. And if you skip that one season in 2012, negative fans have been right for a looooooonnng time lol.
No, they aren't "right", they have no special insight or basketball understanding, they are simply miserable people who want to make everyone else miserable. The Knicks not winning isn't a validation of their miserable opinion.
Triple C wrote:Daily reminder that you can love the Knox pick without trashing other kids drafted and you can not love the Knox pick without saying that the others 59 picks are better than him
KnicksGod wrote:Triple C wrote:Daily reminder that you can love the Knox pick without trashing other kids drafted and you can not love the Knox pick without saying that the others 59 picks are better than him
lol this should be written into our Terms of Use.
The interview MPj gave on Draft night was interesting. He seems to be pretty defensive and I think he know the situation is not good.
Sucks what a roll of the dice it all is. Sports guarantees players nothing really, though he'll still walk away with millions of dollars in the short run.
I'm not even thinking about MPj though. I realize he was a major talent but if he can't pass some physicals still, after returning to play last season, then I think that's a problem. Also you'd think that he would return to school so he can prove himself and get healthy. The fact that he declared anyway tells you he IS trying to lock down the rookie salary as soon as he can.
For him it's at least an insurance policy. But it does seem to make the risk of taking him seemingly higher. There's a reason he is declaring after barely playing, and I don't think that reason is that he thought he'd go top 3 anyway. Follow?
whocares1 wrote:stuporman wrote:whocares1 wrote:
To be fair, Positive fans are positive every season. Negative fans are also negative every season. Every season the Knicks suck or have done something embarrassing that plunges the franchise to new lows so if you think about it, the negative fans have been right since like 2013. And if you skip that one season in 2012, negative fans have been right for a looooooonnng time lol.
No, they aren't "right", they have no special insight or basketball understanding, they are simply miserable people who want to make everyone else miserable. The Knicks not winning isn't a validation of their miserable opinion.
So what you’re saying is that being negative on the Knicks means you have a miserable life? Right..
blanko wrote:Apparently he only started organized ball 3 years ago.... Thata wildAre We Ther Yet wrote:Oscirus wrote:He has the measurements to defend but at the moment based on stats, not really.
This is a concern for me. All I keep hearing about is his length and athleticism. Not his defense. His IQ. His ability to create his own shot. It's all about age/length/athleticism.
Sent from my LGM-V300K using Tapatalk
stuporman wrote:whocares1 wrote:stuporman wrote:
No, they aren't "right", they have no special insight or basketball understanding, they are simply miserable people who want to make everyone else miserable. The Knicks not winning isn't a validation of their miserable opinion.
So what you’re saying is that being negative on the Knicks means you have a miserable life? Right..
Wrong. How people act comes from their perception, what's going on inside them flows out from them in everything they do and say. So if they are miserable on the inside they will see the world through that miserable filter and act/say miserable things.
Someone could be living in a mansion and still be miserable, someone can be living in a tent and be at peace. The conditions of one's life doesn't necessarily dictate how someone feels about it. So, no, I didn't say they have a "miserable life".
magnumt wrote:KnicksGod wrote:Triple C wrote:Daily reminder that you can love the Knox pick without trashing other kids drafted and you can not love the Knox pick without saying that the others 59 picks are better than him
lol this should be written into our Terms of Use.
The interview MPj gave on Draft night was interesting. He seems to be pretty defensive and I think he know the situation is not good.
Sucks what a roll of the dice it all is. Sports guarantees players nothing really, though he'll still walk away with millions of dollars in the short run.
I'm not even thinking about MPj though. I realize he was a major talent but if he can't pass some physicals still, after returning to play last season, then I think that's a problem. Also you'd think that he would return to school so he can prove himself and get healthy. The fact that he declared anyway tells you he IS trying to lock down the rookie salary as soon as he can.
For him it's at least an insurance policy. But it does seem to make the risk of taking him seemingly higher. There's a reason he is declaring after barely playing, and I don't think that reason is that he thought he'd go top 3 anyway. Follow?
MPJr played games from Day 1. It's why he has ALWAYS been at the bottom of my Draft list. The injury risks were just too great.
He withheld medical reports from some teams then wondered why they didn't risk a LOTTERY pick on him!
He lied on Draft night, after being picked by saying he was fine. Then Denver later came out and said they might have to shut him down for the very least, Summer League, and more than likely Red Shirting his Rookie year.
Can't believe this clown MPJr is playing the victim here and looking for a comeback pity story/angle!
--Mags
stuporman wrote:whocares1 wrote:stuporman wrote:
No, they aren't "right", they have no special insight or basketball understanding, they are simply miserable people who want to make everyone else miserable. The Knicks not winning isn't a validation of their miserable opinion.
So what you’re saying is that being negative on the Knicks means you have a miserable life? Right..
Wrong. How people act comes from their perception, what's going on inside them flows out from them in everything they do and say. So if they are miserable on the inside they will see the world through that miserable filter and act/say miserable things.
Someone could be living in a mansion and still be miserable, someone can be living in a tent and be at peace. The conditions of one's life doesn't necessarily dictate how someone feels about it. So, no, I didn't say they have a "miserable life".
whocares1 wrote:stuporman wrote:whocares1 wrote:
So what you’re saying is that being negative on the Knicks means you have a miserable life? Right..
Wrong. How people act comes from their perception, what's going on inside them flows out from them in everything they do and say. So if they are miserable on the inside they will see the world through that miserable filter and act/say miserable things.
Someone could be living in a mansion and still be miserable, someone can be living in a tent and be at peace. The conditions of one's life doesn't necessarily dictate how someone feels about it. So, no, I didn't say they have a "miserable life".
I never talked about wealth. You said negative Knicks fans are miserable and while I’m sure some are (bno) I think most aren’t miserable at all, they just have seen the same story many times already. I disagree with what you’re preaching that negativity spreads through all facets of life. If you’re a Warriors fan or something I doubt you’re moping around about them if your personal life sucks. The Knicks just suck dude lol.
whocares1 wrote:stuporman wrote:whocares1 wrote:
So what you’re saying is that being negative on the Knicks means you have a miserable life? Right..
Wrong. How people act comes from their perception, what's going on inside them flows out from them in everything they do and say. So if they are miserable on the inside they will see the world through that miserable filter and act/say miserable things.
Someone could be living in a mansion and still be miserable, someone can be living in a tent and be at peace. The conditions of one's life doesn't necessarily dictate how someone feels about it. So, no, I didn't say they have a "miserable life".
I never talked about wealth. You said negative Knicks fans are miserable and while I’m sure some are (bno) I think most aren’t miserable at all, they just have seen the same story many times already. I disagree with what you’re preaching that negativity spreads through all facets of life. If you’re a Warriors fan or something I doubt you’re moping around about them if your personal life sucks. The Knicks just suck dude lol.
Jeff Van Gully wrote:stuporman wrote:whocares1 wrote:
So what you’re saying is that being negative on the Knicks means you have a miserable life? Right..
Wrong. How people act comes from their perception, what's going on inside them flows out from them in everything they do and say. So if they are miserable on the inside they will see the world through that miserable filter and act/say miserable things.
Someone could be living in a mansion and still be miserable, someone can be living in a tent and be at peace. The conditions of one's life doesn't necessarily dictate how someone feels about it. So, no, I didn't say they have a "miserable life".
deep
stuporman wrote:whocares1 wrote:stuporman wrote:
No, they aren't "right", they have no special insight or basketball understanding, they are simply miserable people who want to make everyone else miserable. The Knicks not winning isn't a validation of their miserable opinion.
So what you’re saying is that being negative on the Knicks means you have a miserable life? Right..
Wrong. How people act comes from their perception, what's going on inside them flows out from them in everything they do and say. So if they are miserable on the inside they will see the world through that miserable filter and act/say miserable things.
Someone could be living in a mansion and still be miserable, someone can be living in a tent and be at peace. The conditions of one's life doesn't necessarily dictate how someone feels about it. So, no, I didn't say they have a "miserable life".
Jeff Van Gully wrote:magnumt wrote:KnicksGod wrote:
lol this should be written into our Terms of Use.
The interview MPj gave on Draft night was interesting. He seems to be pretty defensive and I think he know the situation is not good.
Sucks what a roll of the dice it all is. Sports guarantees players nothing really, though he'll still walk away with millions of dollars in the short run.
I'm not even thinking about MPj though. I realize he was a major talent but if he can't pass some physicals still, after returning to play last season, then I think that's a problem. Also you'd think that he would return to school so he can prove himself and get healthy. The fact that he declared anyway tells you he IS trying to lock down the rookie salary as soon as he can.
For him it's at least an insurance policy. But it does seem to make the risk of taking him seemingly higher. There's a reason he is declaring after barely playing, and I don't think that reason is that he thought he'd go top 3 anyway. Follow?
MPJr played games from Day 1. It's why he has ALWAYS been at the bottom of my Draft list. The injury risks were just too great.
He withheld medical reports from some teams then wondered why they didn't risk a LOTTERY pick on him!
He lied on Draft night, after being picked by saying he was fine. Then Denver later came out and said they might have to shut him down for the very least, Summer League, and more than likely Red Shirting his Rookie year.
Can't believe this clown MPJr is playing the victim here and looking for a comeback pity story/angle!
--Mags
a lot about this young man doesn't sit well with me. yet, our draft representation (fans) always make us look silly.