ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

Eli Babak
Pro Prospect
Posts: 765
And1: 524
Joined: Jun 21, 2018
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#161 » by Eli Babak » Mon Jun 25, 2018 3:20 pm

Would you do something like Oubre+Gortat for WCS+Jackson? WCS could be that young athletic big and I'm sure he's gonna be a lot cheaper to retain than Oubre. Jackson was pretty trash in his rookie season but I expect him to improve this year. Kings would get a nice fit in Oubre and they could just buyout disgruntled Gortat.

Wall/Satoransky
Beal/FA/Meeks
Brown (trust the kid!)/Jackson + FA
Porter/Morris
WCS/Mahinmi/Smith

Fox/Mason
Bogdanovic/Hield/Shumpert
Oubre/Temple
Bagley/Labissiere
Koufos/Randolph/Giles

(But this could never happen because "we're veteran team" and therefore vets on one year deals will help us more than youth.)
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,160
And1: 20,598
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#162 » by dckingsfan » Mon Jun 25, 2018 3:42 pm

NatP4 wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
We'd be a legit contender for at least one season.

Losing Brown Jr, the 2019 1st & Sato stings but its a small price to pay IMO. I'd sacrifice two prospects and a role player for an opportunity at accomplishing something very special.

Agreed. And then we could do the complete rebuild the following year. Jettison everyone but Beal and Porter.

Terrible idea IMO. A 1 year rental on a guy that just missed the entire 2017-2018 season due to injury. We would have no depth and still wouldn’t beat the warriors if we even made it that far.

But it would probably start the rebuild :D - kind of win/win.
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,190
And1: 7,983
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#163 » by Dat2U » Mon Jun 25, 2018 3:50 pm

NatP4 wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
We'd be a legit contender for at least one season.

Losing Brown Jr, the 2019 1st & Sato stings but its a small price to pay IMO. I'd sacrifice two prospects and a role player for an opportunity at accomplishing something very special.

Agreed. And then we could do the complete rebuild the following year. Jettison everyone but Beal and Porter.


Terrible idea IMO. A 1 year rental on a guy that just missed the entire 2017-2018 season due to injury. We would have no depth and still wouldn’t beat the warriors if we even made it that far.


Because the Warriors are loaded with depth?

They nearly lost to Houston b/c Iggy got hurt.

Of course he would need to pass a physical and be willing to play in DC before agreeing to any deal.

I don't think losing Sato, Brown & a future pick is going to make or break this franchise beyond next season. That die has already been cast... especially according to the folks who anxiously want to blow it all up. So why not push all the marbles in right now?
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,160
And1: 20,598
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#164 » by dckingsfan » Mon Jun 25, 2018 4:18 pm

Dat2U wrote:
NatP4 wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:Agreed. And then we could do the complete rebuild the following year. Jettison everyone but Beal and Porter.


Terrible idea IMO. A 1 year rental on a guy that just missed the entire 2017-2018 season due to injury. We would have no depth and still wouldn’t beat the warriors if we even made it that far.

Because the Warriors are loaded with depth?

They nearly lost to Houston b/c Iggy got hurt.

Of course he would need to pass a physical and be willing to play in DC before agreeing to any deal.

I don't think losing Sato, Brown & a future pick is going to make or break this franchise beyond next season. That die has already been cast... especially according to the folks who anxiously want to blow it all up. So why not push all the marbles in right now?

I'm all in...
User avatar
Error Afflalo
Rookie
Posts: 1,027
And1: 687
Joined: Feb 21, 2009
Location: DMV
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#165 » by Error Afflalo » Mon Jun 25, 2018 4:28 pm

NatP4 wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
We'd be a legit contender for at least one season.

Losing Brown Jr, the 2019 1st & Sato stings but its a small price to pay IMO. I'd sacrifice two prospects and a role player for an opportunity at accomplishing something very special.

Agreed. And then we could do the complete rebuild the following year. Jettison everyone but Beal and Porter.


Terrible idea IMO. A 1 year rental on a guy that just missed the entire 2017-2018 season due to injury. We would have no depth and still wouldn’t beat the warriors if we even made it that far.


That guy is a top 5 player in the league and well worth the risk.

We have almost no depth now. It's clear that Sato, through no fault of his own, is not in the long-term plans and likely won't be here beyond next season. Brown is an unknown. Oubre is a lot more flash than substance. Mahinmi is untradeable. Smith and Meeks are useless. We're in a really bad spot. Any deal that lands Kawhi without giving up Wall, Beal, or Otto is a massive win (and completely unrealistic since this isn't 2K).
JAR69
Senior
Posts: 746
And1: 284
Joined: Jul 25, 2002
   

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#166 » by JAR69 » Mon Jun 25, 2018 6:12 pm

Eli Babak wrote:Would you do something like Oubre+Gortat for WCS+Jackson? WCS could be that young athletic big and I'm sure he's gonna be a lot cheaper to retain than Oubre. Jackson was pretty trash in his rookie season but I expect him to improve this year. Kings would get a nice fit in Oubre and they could just buyout disgruntled Gortat.

Wall/Satoransky
Beal/FA/Meeks
Brown (trust the kid!)/Jackson + FA
Porter/Morris
WCS/Mahinmi/Smith

Fox/Mason
Bogdanovic/Hield/Shumpert
Oubre/Temple
Bagley/Labissiere
Koufos/Randolph/Giles

(But this could never happen because "we're veteran team" and therefore vets on one year deals will help us more than youth.)


That's why getting Temple back is much more likely than Jackson in a trade with Sacto. One old and one young on each side of the deal. Wizards would save $4 million and get an athletic big, plus some wing depth in Temple to replace Oubre and serve as a bridge to Brown or someone else. Doesn't seem crazy.
"It takes talent, strategy and millions of dollars to compete in the N.B.A. But regret is the league’s greatest currency." - Howard Beck
Eli Babak
Pro Prospect
Posts: 765
And1: 524
Joined: Jun 21, 2018
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#167 » by Eli Babak » Mon Jun 25, 2018 6:17 pm

JAR69 wrote:That's why getting Temple back is much more likely than Jackson in a trade with Sacto. One old and one young on each side of the deal. Wizards would save $4 million and get an athletic big, plus some wing depth in Temple to replace Oubre and serve as a bridge to Brown or someone else. Doesn't seem crazy.


Yea, that would make sense. Still would need a bench scorer, maybe dump Smith (and Meeks) to get some extra flexibility and throw money at Seth Curry. Or maybe if stars align, Will Barton...

(By the way, personally I'm in trade Wall -camp but that's not happening. Gotta play with what Ernie & buddies want to do.)
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#168 » by NatP4 » Mon Jun 25, 2018 6:44 pm

I’m fully onboard with dumping Gortat and a 2nd and signing Noel with the room exception and rolling with what we have. I like our team, I like this rotation:

Wall Sato
Beal
Oubre Brown
Porter Morris
Noel Mahinmi

Don’t do the whole “microwave scorer shooting guard that doesn’t play defense” just stagger Beal and Porter and force Porter to be a primary scorer off the bench. Team identity should be play defense and rebound and run.

Keep the 2019 pick and draft Jontay Porter.
User avatar
dangermouse
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,628
And1: 814
Joined: Dec 08, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#169 » by dangermouse » Tue Jun 26, 2018 4:28 am

JAR69 wrote:
Eli Babak wrote:Would you do something like Oubre+Gortat for WCS+Jackson? WCS could be that young athletic big and I'm sure he's gonna be a lot cheaper to retain than Oubre. Jackson was pretty trash in his rookie season but I expect him to improve this year. Kings would get a nice fit in Oubre and they could just buyout disgruntled Gortat.

Wall/Satoransky
Beal/FA/Meeks
Brown (trust the kid!)/Jackson + FA
Porter/Morris
WCS/Mahinmi/Smith

Fox/Mason
Bogdanovic/Hield/Shumpert
Oubre/Temple
Bagley/Labissiere
Koufos/Randolph/Giles

(But this could never happen because "we're veteran team" and therefore vets on one year deals will help us more than youth.)


That's why getting Temple back is much more likely than Jackson in a trade with Sacto. One old and one young on each side of the deal. Wizards would save $4 million and get an athletic big, plus some wing depth in Temple to replace Oubre and serve as a bridge to Brown or someone else. Doesn't seem crazy.


I'm not a huge WCS fan... but I'm also probably one of the biggest Gortat haters here too. So i'd do this just to get some new blood through the door at that position.
Image
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract


Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.
jangles86
Starter
Posts: 2,384
And1: 983
Joined: Jun 02, 2011
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#170 » by jangles86 » Tue Jun 26, 2018 8:56 am

What on earth are we doing with Gortat??? Wasn’t he being shipped and Wall pretty much signing his papers?
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#171 » by NatP4 » Tue Jun 26, 2018 9:12 am

Probably going to be involved in a Cousins or Jordan trade.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 35,160
And1: 20,598
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#172 » by dckingsfan » Tue Jun 26, 2018 12:39 pm

Need to keep him for the farewell tour.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,832
And1: 9,218
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#173 » by payitforward » Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:07 pm

Rand McNally wrote:
payitforward wrote:
Rand McNally wrote:Gortat, Oubre, Jason Smith for Gallinari

No can do for salary reasons -- & other reasons as well. But it would be absolutely impossible to absorb his salary.

What if they found a way to get off Mahinmi next year?

WE'd still be paying $115m+ to 4 guys. We have 3 max contracts, one of them about to become a supermax. We can't acquire any expensive players. Period. In fact, we can't acquire guys with average NBA salaries.
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,242
And1: 2,800
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#174 » by pcbothwel » Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:29 pm

jangles86 wrote:What on earth are we doing with Gortat??? Wasn’t he being shipped and Wall pretty much signing his papers?


He wont be dealt until major FA's make their move. LAL, NYK, Philly, Dallas, etc. are all potential spots that are in the FA market as well.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,832
And1: 9,218
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#175 » by payitforward » Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:37 pm

Dat2U wrote:
DCZards wrote:I don't see any team giving up anything valuable for Leonard unless they are convinced that there's a good possibility that he'd be more than a one-year rental. Right now, Kawhi seems determined to end up in LA at least by the 2019-20 season and that's a problem in any trade scenario...other than a trade to one of the LA teams.

I'd be reluctant to trade Oubre and Sato for Leonard if I didn't think I could sign Kawhi to a long-term deal.

It might be worth it for one season. Even with no modern C on the roster I think we could legitimately challenge Boston and Philly in the East for a spot in the Finals.

...which would be entertaining for us fans, to be sure. A kind of super-sized version of the Paul Pierce season.

At the same time, although Kawhi would obviously make us or any team better (duh), I'd say it's less than even odds we'd be in the ECF, let alone win them. We'd be likely to meet one of Boston/Philly in R2 & even w/ Leonard we'd be more likely to lose than win that series. Boston & Philly are juggernauts.

Still might be worth it. There is clearly neither appetite nor ability in the Wizards FO to build a legitimate championship contender. Perhaps when the team started heading South in a hurry after Kawhi's one year it would lead to replacing Ernie & building a modern FO around the new guy.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,350
And1: 7,453
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#176 » by FAH1223 » Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:51 pm

pcbothwel wrote:
jangles86 wrote:What on earth are we doing with Gortat??? Wasn’t he being shipped and Wall pretty much signing his papers?


He wont be dealt until major FA's make their move. LAL, NYK, Philly, Dallas, etc. are all potential spots that are in the FA market as well.


Yeah, whoever has raw cap space will want a C...

LAC are also a possibility of DeAndre doesn't take his $24M option and goes home to Texas as he almost did in 2015.
Image
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,832
And1: 9,218
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#177 » by payitforward » Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:56 pm

pcbothwel wrote:
payitforward wrote:
Rand McNally wrote:Gortat, Oubre, Jason Smith for Gallinari

No can do for salary reasons -- & other reasons as well. But it would be absolutely impossible to absorb his salary.


Gortat, Morris, and Smith for Gallo and Williams (Non-Guaranteed, Waived).

Wall
Beal / Sato
Otto / Oubre
Gallo
Mahinmi

We get right at the Tax line (about 1-2M over). Puts us in striking distance to move Meeks and get under tax line at deadline.
Its a risk, but our team becomes really dynamic
LAC does this as a way to clear Gallos salary next year, yet take on rotation caliber players who will contribute. They add salary, but stay under tax.

We clearly go into the tax in 19/20, but not the repeater tax. The following year, we get out from under Gallo and Mahinmi and go back under the tax... which would again allow us to stay out of the repeater tax for 2 more years (Which appears to be the line in the sand)

Not the biggest fan of the trade, but was the only iteration of this trade that really works without giving up assets and Mahinmi...it also puts us in contention in the east

Very imaginative! & it does mitigate some of the worst effects of Gallo's salary.

But, I don't see enough motivation for the Clippers. They have time to move Gallinari, & they'll clearly be hoping to get some kind of longer-term asset than 3 expirings. I.e. I think we'd have to give them a pick for this to work. Plus they don't have roster room to absorb 3 guys given 2 R1 picks coming on board.

Nor is Gallinari a particularly good player any more. He's about to turn 30, has a lot of miles on him, has gone downhill the last few seasons, & played 671 minutes last year. I don't want to add $22m in salary obligations for that. I don't think he'd help us to speak of.
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,242
And1: 2,800
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#178 » by pcbothwel » Tue Jun 26, 2018 2:25 pm

payitforward wrote:
pcbothwel wrote:
payitforward wrote:No can do for salary reasons -- & other reasons as well. But it would be absolutely impossible to absorb his salary.


Gortat, Morris, and Smith for Gallo and Williams (Non-Guaranteed, Waived).

Wall
Beal / Sato
Otto / Oubre
Gallo
Mahinmi

We get right at the Tax line (about 1-2M over). Puts us in striking distance to move Meeks and get under tax line at deadline.
Its a risk, but our team becomes really dynamic
LAC does this as a way to clear Gallos salary next year, yet take on rotation caliber players who will contribute. They add salary, but stay under tax.

We clearly go into the tax in 19/20, but not the repeater tax. The following year, we get out from under Gallo and Mahinmi and go back under the tax... which would again allow us to stay out of the repeater tax for 2 more years (Which appears to be the line in the sand)

Not the biggest fan of the trade, but was the only iteration of this trade that really works without giving up assets and Mahinmi...it also puts us in contention in the east

Very imaginative! & it does mitigate some of the worst effects of Gallo's salary.

But, I don't see enough motivation for the Clippers. They have time to move Gallinari, & they'll clearly be hoping to get some kind of longer-term asset than 3 expirings. I.e. I think we'd have to give them a pick for this to work. Plus they don't have roster room to absorb 3 guys given 2 R1 picks coming on board.

Nor is Gallinari a particularly good player any more. He's about to turn 30, has a lot of miles on him, has gone downhill the last few seasons, & played 671 minutes last year. I don't want to add $22m in salary obligations for that. I don't think he'd help us to speak of.


PIF, I agree and thats why I said it wouldnt be my choice... but you are overselling Gallo's decline.
Last year he was hurt and played in only 20 games, but each of the two years before he was as efficient/good as Otto Porter but with a higher usage!?! :o

The problems with Gallo are clear:
1) Expensive
2) Injury prone
3) Defense

The 3rd point is important. He doesnt have the quickness to guard 3's, but he doesnt rebound well enough to be a 4. If only we had a player that could rebound like a 4 and guard 3's ... Oh yeah, Otto

Again.... more in fun/jest.
Not a route I would go
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#179 » by NatP4 » Tue Jun 26, 2018 2:30 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
pcbothwel wrote:
jangles86 wrote:What on earth are we doing with Gortat??? Wasn’t he being shipped and Wall pretty much signing his papers?


He wont be dealt until major FA's make their move. LAL, NYK, Philly, Dallas, etc. are all potential spots that are in the FA market as well.


Yeah, whoever has raw cap space will want a C...

LAC are also a possibility of DeAndre doesn't take his $24M option and goes home to Texas as he almost did in 2015.


Can’t see that happening. Deandre Jordan just isn’t very good anymore. He doesn’t play hard, he doesn’t block shots or anchor a defense. He’s put on too much weight. He should opt in and take the money.
User avatar
gtn130
Analyst
Posts: 3,512
And1: 2,740
Joined: Mar 18, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#180 » by gtn130 » Tue Jun 26, 2018 3:12 pm

NatP4 wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
We'd be a legit contender for at least one season.

Losing Brown Jr, the 2019 1st & Sato stings but its a small price to pay IMO. I'd sacrifice two prospects and a role player for an opportunity at accomplishing something very special.

Agreed. And then we could do the complete rebuild the following year. Jettison everyone but Beal and Porter.


Terrible idea IMO. A 1 year rental on a guy that just missed the entire 2017-2018 season due to injury. We would have no depth and still wouldn’t beat the warriors if we even made it that far.


Alternatively we're in cap hell playing for the 8th seed every year. We're a shade above Detroit and Charlotte in terms of worst NBA franchises.

Look what Morey did to acquire CP3.

Return to Washington Wizards