damedash09 wrote:sogood wrote:
Tatum and brown
There’s not a single player out there that the Celtics would trade both players for
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
damedash09 wrote:sogood wrote:
Tatum and brown
FNQ wrote:SAS "reporting" that Kawhi might not be enamored of playing with LeBron in LA because he doesnt like that kind of media circus.
Which begs the question - why the hell are you going to LA then? Demand a trade to Sacramento, or Milwaukee, or Indiana, or somewhere else in the middle of the country where the paparazzi doesn't flock.
Of course this is all predicated on believing SAS, which you shouldn't. He should put more effort into his bogus rumors.
ChiCitySPORTS#1 wrote:FNQ wrote:SAS "reporting" that Kawhi might not be enamored of playing with LeBron in LA because he doesnt like that kind of media circus.
Which begs the question - why the hell are you going to LA then? Demand a trade to Sacramento, or Milwaukee, or Indiana, or somewhere else in the middle of the country where the paparazzi doesn't flock.
Of course this is all predicated on believing SAS, which you shouldn't. He should put more effort into his bogus rumors.
Yeah I also thought this was curious. That literally is all LA is.
JXL wrote:I think the Celtics package is more enticing to SA than the Lakers package. However, if the Celtics don't believe that trading Jaylen Brown, Terry Rozier, Guershon Yabusele and Memphis' 1st rounder next year is too much, then I see the Sixers coming up with Fultz, Covington and that Sacramento pick.
JXL wrote:I think the Celtics package is more enticing to SA than the Lakers package. However, if the Celtics don't believe that trading Jaylen Brown, Terry Rozier, Guershon Yabusele and Memphis' 1st rounder next year is too much, then I see the Sixers coming up with Fultz, Covington and that Sacramento pick.
damedash09 wrote:ChiCitySPORTS#1 wrote:FNQ wrote:SAS "reporting" that Kawhi might not be enamored of playing with LeBron in LA because he doesnt like that kind of media circus.
Which begs the question - why the hell are you going to LA then? Demand a trade to Sacramento, or Milwaukee, or Indiana, or somewhere else in the middle of the country where the paparazzi doesn't flock.
Of course this is all predicated on believing SAS, which you shouldn't. He should put more effort into his bogus rumors.
Yeah I also thought this was curious. That literally is all LA is.
Maybe he thinks there will be less media on the clippers
JXL wrote:sogood wrote:
"Godfather offer"? Is Magic throwing in Josh Hart with Ingram and Kuzma?
ChiCitySPORTS#1 wrote:FNQ wrote:SAS "reporting" that Kawhi might not be enamored of playing with LeBron in LA because he doesnt like that kind of media circus.
Which begs the question - why the hell are you going to LA then? Demand a trade to Sacramento, or Milwaukee, or Indiana, or somewhere else in the middle of the country where the paparazzi doesn't flock.
Of course this is all predicated on believing SAS, which you shouldn't. He should put more effort into his bogus rumors.
Yeah I also thought this was curious. That literally is all LA is.
TommyPoints wrote:Veez wrote:JXL wrote:I think the Celtics package is more enticing to SA than the Lakers package. However, if the Celtics don't believe that trading Jaylen Brown, Terry Rozier, Guershon Yabusele and Memphis' 1st rounder next year is too much, then I see the Sixers coming up with Fultz, Covington and that Sacramento pick.
everything is too much for a 1 year rental. Ainge isn't giving up Brown only for Kawhi to leave. Nor are the sixers giving up Fultz. Paul George leaving the thunder for LA and going through on his promise is only going to drive that point home and give LA & Kawhi more leverage
I think that actually makes LA more desperate actually. LA needs this to happen soon.
EricAnderson wrote:To me if you’re gonna gamble do it for a player like Kawhi..
The nba is about getting top of the league players you NEED to win titles and Kawhi is one of those few players..
Chances are slim to none any assets you give up whether you’re the Lakers Celtics or a Sixers will ever be a top of the league player.
I’d take my chances that once Kawhi gets to my team and we’re highly successful that there’s a good chance he’d resign
Noctilux wrote:JXL wrote:sogood wrote:
"Godfather offer"? Is Magic throwing in Josh Hart with Ingram and Kuzma?
No they unearthed Marlon Brando's corpse, removed the worms, and dressed him in Valentino.
EricAnderson wrote:To me if you’re gonna gamble do it for a player like Kawhi..
The nba is about getting top of the league players you NEED to win titles and Kawhi is one of those few players..
Chances are slim to none any assets you give up whether you’re the Lakers Celtics or a Sixers will ever be a top of the league player.
I’d take my chances that once Kawhi gets to my team and we’re highly successful that there’s a good chance he’d resign
Jay 20 wrote:EricAnderson wrote:To me if you’re gonna gamble do it for a player like Kawhi..
The nba is about getting top of the league players you NEED to win titles and Kawhi is one of those few players..
Chances are slim to none any assets you give up whether you’re the Lakers Celtics or a Sixers will ever be a top of the league player.
I’d take my chances that once Kawhi gets to my team and we’re highly successful that there’s a good chance he’d resign
True I do think you have great points, but we will see how that logic plays out with OKC and PG.
nbafan38 wrote:EricAnderson wrote:To me if you’re gonna gamble do it for a player like Kawhi..
The nba is about getting top of the league players you NEED to win titles and Kawhi is one of those few players..
Chances are slim to none any assets you give up whether you’re the Lakers Celtics or a Sixers will ever be a top of the league player.
I’d take my chances that once Kawhi gets to my team and we’re highly successful that there’s a good chance he’d resign
Yea especially a team like Boston with how well run of an organization they are and a big market would have an excellent chance of resigning Kawhi, I agree it's worth the gamble if you are the celtics. They have been building and building and done a great job but at some point they need to land a true top 5 player to get over the top in todays nba.
DieYoung wrote:ChiCitySPORTS#1 wrote:FNQ wrote:SAS "reporting" that Kawhi might not be enamored of playing with LeBron in LA because he doesnt like that kind of media circus.
Which begs the question - why the hell are you going to LA then? Demand a trade to Sacramento, or Milwaukee, or Indiana, or somewhere else in the middle of the country where the paparazzi doesn't flock.
Of course this is all predicated on believing SAS, which you shouldn't. He should put more effort into his bogus rumors.
Yeah I also thought this was curious. That literally is all LA is.
That's clearly from his uncle/management. He wants to exploit his nephew by building a brand and Lebron's superstardom makes it impossible to do that if they're on the same team. Hard to get the best sponsors and shoe deals when your role in LA is Lebron's sidekick. This is the same idiot that spurned Nike because they thought 5 mil a year was too low for his nephew. They clearly didn't think through their "LA or bust" narrative they cooked up.
fishnc wrote:If I had a gun with two bullets and I was in a room with Hitler, Bin Laden, and LeBron, I would shoot LeBron twice.