BBALLER4FR wrote:dakomish23 wrote:BBALLER4FR wrote:
Because Mills decided he didn't want to shackle Fizdale with a starting lineup of primarily 1's and 2's and he saw a freak 7fter who is just scratching the surface of his potential at a time O'Quinn opted out and Noah is on the downside. But I can see how creating a battle royale between Burke, Baker, Frank, Mudiay, ThJr annd Dotson would be the better option.
You are trying to build your core for the 2020’s right now.
They liked him, they took him. That’s fine.
But that's the answer right there. His potential, physical attributes and his skillset based on how little he's played makes this a no brainer. We can draft 2nd round guards any day. How often will you find McDonalds All American contributors previous slated as a potential lotto pick that fall to the early 2nd round with this kids skillset?
dakomish23 wrote:In no way shape or form should any of those guys except Frank prevent you from taking a guard if you liked him.
So rather than create some certainty at those spots, you prefer to add to the roster confusion?
dakomish23 wrote:KOQ & Noah should have no effect on picking a big for the future.
Neither should Melton.
Sure we can pick a big anytime. But how often will one with Robinson's potential will just fall to us? Unless you're hope is to continuously be in the lotto until the next KAT gets here, it's a no brainer to get a freak, under the radar C in the 2nd round over a 6'4" guard with a second round pick.
dakomish23 wrote:Vets and low ceiling guards who likely won’t be a part of that team should not be guiding the Knicks team building effort.
Your logic is beyond flawed.
As is yours wondering why we passed on Melton for Robinson.
A. I didn’t have a problem with taking Robinson. I asked why we passed on Melton as in did anyone hear anything about him and the Knicks.
B. Not drafting another guard does not create certainty. It reperesents a missed opportunity if he proves to be a keeper and those guys didn’t.
C. You brought up KOQ opting out and Noah dead weight as a reason to take him. I’m saying their situation should of had no bearing on attaining another big. You saying “neither should Melton” does not apply to the original statement you made. You just wanted to say that.
D. We didn’t even discuss the merits of taking Melton instead of Mitchell. You just made excuses b/c that’s the pick we made. If we took Melton, you’d make excuses for why we picked him. In fact, you’d be using the mediocre guards as an excuse to get a guard with higher upside.