Jedi32 wrote:CIN-C-STAR wrote:Jedi32 wrote:How do you know the stories are true though?
Because a professional basketball reporter who's job it is to cover the Spurs went on record and said those things were true, with his career at stake?
Or, you know, you could just believe whatever you want because "It's possible" that's true instead.
I just find it funny that all this negative stuff comes out about kawhi after he seeks a second opinion for an injury and after he wants to leave. If he was such a headache to the spurs and pop and rc Buford are such stand up guys who are high on character and what not, then why do the spurs want to keep kawhi? Something just isn’t adding up.
I think what's not adding up is simply your interpretation of events.
Kawhi sought a second opinion last summer, and then got a third opinion, and then assumed control of his own rehab nearly a year ago on August 8.
There were no leaks at that time or immediately after. The leaks started in January, with a leak that Kawhi wanted a trade.
So your suggestion that "all this negative stuff comes out about kawhi after he seeks a second opinion for an injury," is inaccurate, unless by "after" you just meant
any time after, even way after, and if that's what you meant, that wouldn't be funny or coincidental at all since our perception of time is linear and everything new happens after everything else that has already happened.
Just seems like ignoring facts and doing mental gymnastics to try to make the Spurs look bad tbh.
And also, they want to keep him because he is really good at basketball,
and because he and his group have intentionally sabotaged his trade value, and they are in the business of winning basketball games, so keeping him would help them achieve their goal the most at this point. Pretty easy to figure out if you're willing to look at the situation without a slant.