Zach Lavine: Offered 4/80 from Kings update p26 Bulls Matched
Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
-
musiqsoulchild
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,550
- And1: 6,359
- Joined: Nov 28, 2005
- Location: Chicago
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
Here we are: Why these guys get to run our favorite teams. Do the right thing Pax and Gar.
My line in the sand is clear now.
Give the keys to Dunn and Lauri. Say bye-bye to Zach.
My line in the sand is clear now.
Give the keys to Dunn and Lauri. Say bye-bye to Zach.
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
-
Dan Z
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,556
- And1: 9,215
- Joined: Feb 19, 2002
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
Too bad Tyreke Evans is off the market.
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
- mrlancers
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,820
- And1: 1,160
- Joined: Jul 05, 2010
-
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
Bulls are totally matching that and I'm not happy about it.
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
-
blicka
- Junior
- Posts: 439
- And1: 363
- Joined: May 10, 2018
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
If the Bulls really wanted to keep lavine they should of been more aggressive instead of the usual cheap routine
Now they have a decision to make. The official offer is 4 years 78 mil btw
Now they have a decision to make. The official offer is 4 years 78 mil btw
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
-
ryan44
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,146
- And1: 985
- Joined: Dec 29, 2010
-
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
Betta Bulleavit wrote:Well, there’s the offer that the naysayers were wondering about. It’s a bit rich. But I see a match coming.
Let him walk.
If Sacramento thinks something is a good idea, it's not.
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
- BR0D1E86
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,759
- And1: 2,292
- Joined: Jul 18, 2002
-
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
RememberLu wrote:.
J.R. Smith btw, has a ring. And for the longest time Bulls fans were tossing his name about with the likes of O.J. Mayo and Arron Afflalo to be our starting 2 guard for those D.Rose era Thibs teams.
He does. And if one of the players we just drafted ends up being a top 3 player of all time, Lavine might coat tail ride to a ring as well. But it will hardly be because of him.
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
- Magilla_Gorilla
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,059
- And1: 4,481
- Joined: Oct 24, 2006
- Location: Sunday Morning coming down...
-
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
-
Scalaboner
- Sophomore
- Posts: 137
- And1: 111
- Joined: Jun 12, 2018
-
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
umfan83 wrote:StunnerKO wrote:?s=21
Lmao **** him. This is how the Bulls approach RFA
Yeah after those remarks I hope when he calls to inform the Bulls of the offer they just say “Enjoy spending 4 years out West” and hang up the phone. $20 mil a year is too much hard pass.
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
-
aguifs
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,086
- And1: 1,578
- Joined: Jul 14, 2009
- Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
-
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
He's good as gone... So what's the next step? We're much near to a rock bottom team than a start to pretend squad.
#FIREAKME #BOYCOTTABULL #REINSDORKSELLTHEFRANCHISE
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
- keloms
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,692
- And1: 1,947
- Joined: Aug 02, 2010
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
-
Dresden
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,393
- And1: 6,722
- Joined: Nov 02, 2017
-
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
That offer is just rich enough to be a problem if Lavine doesn't improve, yet cheap enough that the Bulls just might figure they need to match it to keep him from getting away for nothing. If it had been 4/100, fine, let him. Or 4/60, sure, you match it. But 20 mil a year for what he has done in the league so far just seems like you're really doing some wishful thinking on what he might become. I'd rather let someone else deal with the disappointment, and use that money instead on more productive players.
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
- dumbell78
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,137
- And1: 5,476
- Joined: Apr 03, 2012
- Location: Sydney, Aus. by way of Muddy Water land (Chicago)
-
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
Sac has really trolled us superbly this off season. First the coin toss and now this. 18 mil was the max overpay I would swallow. Let him enjoy Sacramento.
KC: Do you still think you're a championship-caliber team?
Gar: I never said that and correct me if I'm wrong.
KC: You were asked that question at the news conference announcing Thibodeau's dismissal and you answered yes
Gar: I never said that and correct me if I'm wrong.
KC: You were asked that question at the news conference announcing Thibodeau's dismissal and you answered yes
Re: Zach Lavine: Offered 4/80 from Kings update p4
-
madvillian
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,402
- And1: 9,371
- Joined: Dec 23, 2004
- Location: Brooklyn
Re: Zach Lavine: Offered 4/80 from Kings update p4
NO, NO, GOD NO.
dumbell78 wrote:Random comment....Mikal Bridges stroke is dripping right now in summer league. Carry on.
I'll go ahead and make a sig bet that Mikal is better by RPM this year than Zach.
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
- TheJordanRule
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,155
- And1: 1,463
- Joined: Jan 27, 2014
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
SensiBull wrote:StunnerKO wrote:?s=21
That's what I want to hear.
Go West, young man!
If Sac wants to pay 20 millionish per year for a decent sixth man, we should definitely agree that they are wise and stick them with the deal. At that point they are literally paying the kid as if he’s a second or third option when he hasn’t even produced as someone worthy of being in a decent team’s starting line up and has a skill set so raw that he could be out of the league in a year or two if a dip in production occurs.
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
-
League Circles
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,658
- And1: 10,106
- Joined: Dec 04, 2001
-
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
musiqsoulchild wrote:Here we are: Why these guys get to run our favorite teams. Do the right thing Pax and Gar.
My line in the sand is clear now.
Give the keys to Dunn and Lauri. Say bye-bye to Zach.
Whoa! What happened? Did I miss something in the last couple hours?
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
Re: Zach Lavine: Offered 4/80 from Kings update p4
- BR0D1E86
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,759
- And1: 2,292
- Joined: Jul 18, 2002
-
Re: Zach Lavine: Offered 4/80 from Kings update p4
Easy pass for me. Zero hesitation.
Re: Zach Lavine: Offered 4/80 from Kings update p4
-
madvillian
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,402
- And1: 9,371
- Joined: Dec 23, 2004
- Location: Brooklyn
Re: Zach Lavine: Offered 4/80 from Kings update p4
Ask yourself this -- would you EVER do something the Kings just did? NO. Let them be the dumbass team to bet on the slim chance he's really a good player. DO NOT FOLLOW THE KINGS.
dumbell78 wrote:Random comment....Mikal Bridges stroke is dripping right now in summer league. Carry on.
I'll go ahead and make a sig bet that Mikal is better by RPM this year than Zach.
Re: Zach Lavine: Offered 4/80 from Kings update p4
-
BoogieTime
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,445
- And1: 3,072
- Joined: Feb 09, 2017
-
Re: Zach Lavine: Offered 4/80 from Kings update p4
I got nothing...
Please match
Please match
Re: Zach Lavine: Offered 4/80 from Kings update p4
-
DarthDiggler69
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,879
- And1: 2,368
- Joined: Oct 09, 2013
Re: Zach Lavine: Offered 4/80 from Kings update p4
I still believe in Lavine being a fringe star but not enough at 4/78m
Bull I bet Bulls get him back
Bull I bet Bulls get him back
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
-
Dresden
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,393
- And1: 6,722
- Joined: Nov 02, 2017
-
Re: Zach Lavine (r)free agency 2.0
blicka wrote:If the Bulls really wanted to keep lavine they should of been more aggressive instead of the usual cheap routine
Now they have a decision to make. The official offer is 4 years 78 mil btw
How do you know what they've done or haven't done with him? Maybe they've made him offers, that he refused?









