
per Kings reporter.
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts


Kyrie For Three wrote:With all this praise being lavished on Rozier, I can only hope Greg Popovich feels the exact same way.

SMTBSI wrote:sully00 wrote:itrsteve wrote:Somebody needs to explain to him how the CBA works and the implication if the C’s pay him over the QA and the impact of the upcoming seasons. If you sat him down with the numbers then maybe he wouldn’t feel so insulted if the big picture was known?
I’m torn as I don’t want him to leave, but 18/19 isn’t the season to start the luxury tax counter. There’s a very short window to “go for it” financially and it can’t start until next season.
Boston can go over the tax this year and back under next year and it stops the repeater clock. Honestly the tax really doesn't matter the team is going to pay it. What you can't do is overpay role players. Marcus Smart needs to get paid his job isn't to manage Boston's salary structure. Boston can't get into a 4 year deal with Smart that has them vastly overpaying him for the mins he is playing two years from now that make it a problem to sign Brown and Tatum while keeping and Irving, Haywood, and Horford.
If you value a guy at 11-12 mil then pay him his money. But you can't go to 15-16 mil because you might lose him otherwise, lose him and go pay somebody else to do his job for 5 mil.
Agree in general, but with a couple notes:
1.) Repeater penalty applies if you have been in the tax for three out of four seasons. So going under for one year doesn't exactly "reset" the clock - it just gets you partway to resetting the clock. It's still beneficial to put off the beginning of that 3-in-4 stretch, if possible.
2.) It would just be an awful shame to start the clock because you came in above the tax by like a mil. Not the end of the world, but if you're within a hairsbreadth of staying under anyway, it makes some sense to try to do so, and put off the start of the clock for a year when you're going to be clearly, unavoidably over, like we presumably will be next year.
Basically, you don't want the value of a minimum contract to be the margin by which you're over, because then you're basically paying the tax for that minimum player.


grindtime22 wrote:KumaJG wrote:Captain_Caveman wrote:
If you are calling him a knockdown 3-point shooter, you don't understand the term.
FWIW, out of 129 qualified players last year, dude was 127th in FG%, 113th in Adj FG%, 117th in points per shot.
FG% dont matter much, when you are a knockdown shooter from 3, which 38%. Only in your weird universe where 38% is not knockdown.
FG% doesn't matter, but his overall level of efficiency does
His 38% from 3 is good. BUT, it doesn't make up for his level of awful shooting from other areas of the court. His 52% TS is far below league average (55.6).
Gant wrote:Smart on the Kings means all the Kings will play much harder, which will cost the Celtics valuable ping pongs.
The Celtics will be inclined to match at a higher price with Sacramento than any other team.
How much extra would Boston pay to move up in next year's draft?

Captain_Caveman wrote:Homerclease wrote:Captain_Caveman wrote:
In Smart's case, but not Terry's apparently.
Among the many other bad point made in this thread, I also reject the notion that Smart has not improved as a player since his rookie year. He is a much better playmaker, and a much defender than he was coming in. He has also become a team leader, on and off the floor.
I never said he didn’t. My point was Rozier is getting better at a greater and faster rate. Both players can improve at the same time. One has improved more than the other. If Smart wants to be a better playmaker, he needs to cut down on his turnovers drastically. Something he’s been unable to do.
Perception, not reality. Neither are big turnover guys. Terry slightly more efficient in Ast/TO ratio, but Smart is the one who gets called upon to actually run an offense, especially in light of the Hayward and Kyrie injuries.
reload141 wrote:
per Kings reporter.
Afam wrote:Sherrod is not a bad sports reporter. He has broken some sports news .Adrain Wojnarowski gets info from agents and from teams in exchange for favors. Even Chris Broussard said so today. People overhype Adrian Wojonarowski but he is no different from any sports reporter/journalist. Al Sherrod was one of the first people who mentioned the celtics drafting Jaylen Brown. He is not perfect, could do better, but he is ok in my opinion.