ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

verbal8
General Manager
Posts: 8,354
And1: 1,377
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
     

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#461 » by verbal8 » Wed Jul 18, 2018 10:09 am

I am a huge Otto Porter fan, but Leonard would be a chance at a Superstar. With the Wall contract, I figure the Wizards window is 2 maybe 3 years. If acquiring Leonard would put us into a real contender level, it is worth the significant long-term risk of moving Porter.

It would be even better for the Wizards if the Spurs were willing to accept Beal or Wall instead, but I think Porter would be the more likely target on the Spurs side.

This is likely all moot because it seems the Raptors are in the lead towards acquiring Leonard.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#462 » by NatP4 » Wed Jul 18, 2018 12:24 pm

Well, the raptors have Kawhi Leonard now..
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#463 » by NatP4 » Wed Jul 18, 2018 12:31 pm

LOL, Toronto might be giving up Derozan, Anunoby, and a 1st round pick for a guy that sits out all year
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,937
And1: 9,318
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#464 » by queridiculo » Wed Jul 18, 2018 12:53 pm

Yet another case were the Wizards lack of assets has them ill prepared for a situation like this.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#465 » by NatP4 » Wed Jul 18, 2018 1:02 pm

That’s the equivalent to us giving up Beal, Oubre, and a 1st, for a guy that has no interest in being a raptor.

Awful
JWizmentality
RealGM
Posts: 14,101
And1: 5,122
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Cosmic Totality
   

Re: RE: Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#466 » by JWizmentality » Wed Jul 18, 2018 1:51 pm

NatP4 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:This

Sent from my LG-TP260 using RealGM mobile app


Nonsense. If we're ignoring contracts, and strictly looking to be the best we can be. It's either Beal or Porter getting shipped out. Preferably Beal.


why would we ever "ignore contracts"? you think we're beating GS in 2018-2019?? and even then, your statement is pretty debatable. I 100% feel that Otto Porter is more important to this team than Wall. He's our best player.


I'm just talking about Xs and Os dude. Yes, ignoring contracts. Nobody's beating G-State now or anytime in the near future. Otto Porter is our most efficient player. He doesn't move the needle though. He's too passive. He doesn't take over games. I get it. You don't like John Wall, but he's our best player.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,335
And1: 7,439
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#467 » by FAH1223 » Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:05 pm

Read on Twitter
Image
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: RE: Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#468 » by NatP4 » Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:10 pm

JWizmentality wrote:
NatP4 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
Nonsense. If we're ignoring contracts, and strictly looking to be the best we can be. It's either Beal or Porter getting shipped out. Preferably Beal.


why would we ever "ignore contracts"? you think we're beating GS in 2018-2019?? and even then, your statement is pretty debatable. I 100% feel that Otto Porter is more important to this team than Wall. He's our best player.


I'm just talking about Xs and Os dude. Yes, ignoring contracts. Nobody's beating G-State now or anytime in the near future. Otto Porter is our most efficient player. He doesn't move the needle though. He's too passive. He doesn't take over games. I get it. You don't like John Wall, but he's our best player.


Based on some YouTube highlights and 2K ratings, got it.
JWizmentality
RealGM
Posts: 14,101
And1: 5,122
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Cosmic Totality
   

Re: RE: Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#469 » by JWizmentality » Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:12 pm

NatP4 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
NatP4 wrote:
why would we ever "ignore contracts"? you think we're beating GS in 2018-2019?? and even then, your statement is pretty debatable. I 100% feel that Otto Porter is more important to this team than Wall. He's our best player.


I'm just talking about Xs and Os dude. Yes, ignoring contracts. Nobody's beating G-State now or anytime in the near future. Otto Porter is our most efficient player. He doesn't move the needle though. He's too passive. He doesn't take over games. I get it. You don't like John Wall, but he's our best player.


Based on some YouTube highlights and 2K ratings, got it.


You're real bitter dude. Wall run over your puppy or something? :lol:
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: RE: Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#470 » by NatP4 » Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:25 pm

JWizmentality wrote:
NatP4 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
I'm just talking about Xs and Os dude. Yes, ignoring contracts. Nobody's beating G-State now or anytime in the near future. Otto Porter is our most efficient player. He doesn't move the needle though. He's too passive. He doesn't take over games. I get it. You don't like John Wall, but he's our best player.


Based on some YouTube highlights and 2K ratings, got it.


You're real bitter dude. Wall run over your puppy or something? :lol:


Compared to some of your posts about Beal?? Come on dude
JWizmentality
RealGM
Posts: 14,101
And1: 5,122
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Cosmic Totality
   

Re: RE: Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#471 » by JWizmentality » Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:40 pm

NatP4 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
NatP4 wrote:
Based on some YouTube highlights and 2K ratings, got it.


You're real bitter dude. Wall run over your puppy or something? :lol:


Compared to some of your posts about Beal?? Come on dude


I like shooters who can shoot. :D

But honestly, my only criticisms of Beal only came about because you, CCJ and others started to push your Wall agenda all over the board, and when it comes down to it, he's far more flawed than Wall. Except for Wall contract, he's the better, more talented player period. Unlike you, I remember what Wall is capable of at his peak...something Otto nor Beal is likely to reach. Dems the brakes. But no matter what either of us think, Ernie and Ted aren't trading him unless he wants out so yeah....booyah. :D
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: RE: Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#472 » by NatP4 » Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:42 pm

JWizmentality wrote:
NatP4 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
You're real bitter dude. Wall run over your puppy or something? :lol:


Compared to some of your posts about Beal?? Come on dude


I like shooters who can shoot. :D


Career 40% 3pt shooter, 80% from the FT line.....in the first 45 minutes of the game lol
JWizmentality
RealGM
Posts: 14,101
And1: 5,122
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Cosmic Totality
   

Re: RE: Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#473 » by JWizmentality » Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:48 pm

NatP4 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
NatP4 wrote:
Compared to some of your posts about Beal?? Come on dude


I like shooters who can shoot. :D


Career 40% 3pt shooter, 80% from the FT line.....in the first 45 minutes of the game lol


Exactly...I should have prefaced that with when it matters. :lol:
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: RE: Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#474 » by Ruzious » Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:54 pm

MVPofDC wrote:
NatP4 wrote:
MVPofDC wrote:
Yes, I like Otto but not for his contract. Sending him alone would be unlikely to get a deal done. I rather get that off the books and take a chance of elevating the team to a higher level instead of staying as a subpar PO team every year.


WE ARE NOT SUBPAR BECAUSE OF OTTO PORTER :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

he is worth every single penny of that max deal. Basketball is not all about points per game and flashy highlights. Otto Porter is our best defender. he rebounds as well as our starting PF, he can guard multiple positions effectively. He plays harder than anyone else on the team. He's extremely high character, he's a ridiculously efficient offensive player that literally never does dumb sh**. Can score from every level, doesn't turn it over, doesn't ever hijack the offense, always hustles and makes the extra effort plays. The guy has never even had poor body language on the court once, on a dumpster fire team that loses to every sub 500 team in the NBA, never once has he even thrown his arms up in the air at a teammate.

I mean, he averages 17-7-2-2 only 1.1 turnovers per 36 on .600 TS% and is basically top 20 in the NBA for every advanced stat known to man. He's also only 24 years old.

He is EXACTLY what you want in a basketball player. If we lose him "just to get his contract off the books" this franchise is completely f***** and i'm out. Hell, I might be somewhat happy to see him go, just so he can up his usage somewhere else, playing for a coach that isn't a moron, and show all of the casual fans that he can easily average 20 ppg


Yes, we are not subpar because of Otto but I'd be ok if he has to go to bring on Kawhi - even if only for a year. I think Wall's deal is near unmovable. Even if Kawhi did walk after a year it would give us more flexibility that the current situation.

I rather see the Wizards roll the dice instead of :banghead: every regular/postseason. We're just spinning our wheels at this point. I hope the Spurs feel the same way about Porter as you do.

We'd still be over the cap the next season even if we lose Leonard, so while yes, there'd be some increased flexibility as far as using exceptions, there would still be just limited flexibility.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
Error Afflalo
Rookie
Posts: 1,027
And1: 687
Joined: Feb 21, 2009
Location: DMV
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#475 » by Error Afflalo » Wed Jul 18, 2018 4:10 pm

I love that deal for Toronto. They weren't going anywhere with Lowry/DeRozan. Swinging for the fences was the right move.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#476 » by NatP4 » Wed Jul 18, 2018 4:11 pm

Read on Twitter
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#477 » by NatP4 » Wed Jul 18, 2018 4:11 pm

Error Afflalo wrote:I love that deal for Toronto. They weren't going anywhere with Lowry/DeRozan. Swinging for the fences was the right move.


Yeah, IF he plays. Which is a massive “if”
User avatar
Error Afflalo
Rookie
Posts: 1,027
And1: 687
Joined: Feb 21, 2009
Location: DMV
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#478 » by Error Afflalo » Wed Jul 18, 2018 4:22 pm

NatP4 wrote:That’s the equivalent to us giving up Beal, Oubre, and a 1st, for a guy that has no interest in being a raptor.

Awful


It's a little different. Beal is four years younger than DeRozan and a cleaner fit next to Aldridge, Murray, and the rest of SA's guys. He's also locked in for the same number of years as DeRozan. I'm willing to bet Beal's value is higher, which means a decent GM (which we don't have) could build a Kawhi-Beal deal without including Oubre and a 1st. Maybe one of those two, but not both.

With that said, I'd do Beal, Oubre, and a protected 1st for Kawhi and Green all day, but I'm not as high on our core as most.
User avatar
Error Afflalo
Rookie
Posts: 1,027
And1: 687
Joined: Feb 21, 2009
Location: DMV
 

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#479 » by Error Afflalo » Wed Jul 18, 2018 4:24 pm

NatP4 wrote:
Error Afflalo wrote:I love that deal for Toronto. They weren't going anywhere with Lowry/DeRozan. Swinging for the fences was the right move.


Yeah, IF he plays. Which is a massive “if”


He'd be a moron to sit out the year if he's healthy.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,011
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread -- Part XXXVI 

Post#480 » by NatP4 » Wed Jul 18, 2018 4:48 pm

Error Afflalo wrote:
NatP4 wrote:That’s the equivalent to us giving up Beal, Oubre, and a 1st, for a guy that has no interest in being a raptor.

Awful


It's a little different. Beal is four years younger than DeRozan and a cleaner fit next to Aldridge, Murray, and the rest of SA's guys. He's also locked in for the same number of years as DeRozan. I'm willing to bet Beal's value is higher, which means a decent GM (which we don't have) could build a Kawhi-Beal deal without including Oubre and a 1st. Maybe one of those two, but not both.

With that said, I'd do Beal, Oubre, and a protected 1st for Kawhi and Green all day, but I'm not as high on our core as most.


Yeah I posted that when I thought it was Anunoby instead of Poetl and an unprotected 2019 1st. I like the move from the raptors.

The spurs get a bad contract on a player that doesn’t play any defense, he’s already 29, the pick probably turns into a couple 2nd rounders, and Poetl is a low upside backup C at best.

And we can’t forget Danny Green. High character guy that is still great perimeter defender.

Return to Washington Wizards