Scott Hall wrote:
LOL whats with all these has-beens coming back with their digs? the sign up for Big3 tournament is over there folks.
Moderators: Morris_Shatford, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, DG88, HiJiNX, 7 Footer
Scott Hall wrote:
Chandan wrote:
What is so loyal about him that he did in the public eye that other NBA players doesn't do?
For myself I tend to work backwards. I look at the result and I take an educated guess on someone's mindset.
When everything has pretty much worked out for derozan in Toronto: being the alpha dog in marke t all by himself; receiving a big contract; living in a place where he gets worshipped; super long leash didn't have to play defense. All things lead me to the conclusion that the advantage he gains being here is large enough that loyalty doesn't really need to factor into the decision.
Loyalty isn't something to boast about when things are going peachy returning to a team year after year of stumbling in the playoffs and getting another shot to prove your worth. Loyalty is when you get traded away from a situation that clearly isn't working and being understanding and not bad-mouthing your former team and crying on social media. That'd the standard I ahere to, and if he step outside he is no longer loyal IMO.
Risk101 wrote:Sources close to DeRozan told ESPN that DeRozan met with Toronto brass in Las Vegas during summer league and was told he would not be traded.
Makes sense why he was mad.
whysoserious wrote:Chandan wrote:
What is so loyal about him that he did in the public eye that other NBA players doesn't do?
For myself I tend to work backwards. I look at the result and I take an educated guess on someone's mindset.
When everything has pretty much worked out for derozan in Toronto: being the alpha dog in marke t all by himself; receiving a big contract; living in a place where he gets worshipped; super long leash didn't have to play defense. All things lead me to the conclusion that the advantage he gains being here is large enough that loyalty doesn't really need to factor into the decision.
Loyalty isn't something to boast about when things are going peachy returning to a team year after year of stumbling in the playoffs and getting another shot to prove your worth. Loyalty is when you get traded away from a situation that clearly isn't working and being understanding and not bad-mouthing your former team and crying on social media. That'd the standard I ahere to, and if he step outside he is no longer loyal IMO.
He publicly stated he wanted to be in Toronto multiple times, when things were bad he still wanted to be here. He never wanted out despite all the playoff struggles and media calling him out (how quickly the US media has turned on that front).
So what if he was given all those things in Toronto, does that go against him being loyal? No, it's all a factor, why do you dismiss it so easily.
Where did he bad mouth anyone? Where has he been shown to suddenly be disloyal? He's venting about being told one thing and the opposite happening and he's showing you just how much he wanted to stay here, that he didn't want to leave.
whysoserious wrote:Chandan wrote:
What is so loyal about him that he did in the public eye that other NBA players doesn't do?
For myself I tend to work backwards. I look at the result and I take an educated guess on someone's mindset.
When everything has pretty much worked out for derozan in Toronto: being the alpha dog in marke t all by himself; receiving a big contract; living in a place where he gets worshipped; super long leash didn't have to play defense. All things lead me to the conclusion that the advantage he gains being here is large enough that loyalty doesn't really need to factor into the decision.
Loyalty isn't something to boast about when things are going peachy returning to a team year after year of stumbling in the playoffs and getting another shot to prove your worth. Loyalty is when you get traded away from a situation that clearly isn't working and being understanding and not bad-mouthing your former team and crying on social media. That'd the standard I ahere to, and if he step outside he is no longer loyal IMO.
He publicly stated he wanted to be in Toronto multiple times, when things were bad he still wanted to be here. He never wanted out despite all the playoff struggles and media calling him out (how quickly the US media has turned on that front).
So what if he was given all those things in Toronto, does that go against him being loyal? No, it's all a factor, why do you dismiss it so easily.
Where did he bad mouth anyone? Where has he been shown to suddenly be disloyal? He's venting about being told one thing and the opposite happening and he's showing you just how much he wanted to stay here, that he didn't want to leave.

Local_NG_Idiot wrote:Showing loyalty includes the difficult times. DD had the opportunity to bite his tongue on a management mistep and keep his anger within his own private circle, but no, the first time he feels the team disrespects him and it's off to the races on social media.
Pop showed loyalty after Kawhi holds one of a handful of Pop's last coaching seasons hostage, acting like an infant and forcing his way out of the organization @ .25 cents on the dollar and yet Pop STILL comes out and praises Kawhi. THAT is loyalty, not what DeRozan did when times were easy on him and the franchise catered to his wishes.
Chandan wrote:whysoserious wrote:Chandan wrote:
What is so loyal about him that he did in the public eye that other NBA players doesn't do?
For myself I tend to work backwards. I look at the result and I take an educated guess on someone's mindset.
When everything has pretty much worked out for derozan in Toronto: being the alpha dog in marke t all by himself; receiving a big contract; living in a place where he gets worshipped; super long leash didn't have to play defense. All things lead me to the conclusion that the advantage he gains being here is large enough that loyalty doesn't really need to factor into the decision.
Loyalty isn't something to boast about when things are going peachy returning to a team year after year of stumbling in the playoffs and getting another shot to prove your worth. Loyalty is when you get traded away from a situation that clearly isn't working and being understanding and not bad-mouthing your former team and crying on social media. That'd the standard I ahere to, and if he step outside he is no longer loyal IMO.
He publicly stated he wanted to be in Toronto multiple times, when things were bad he still wanted to be here. He never wanted out despite all the playoff struggles and media calling him out (how quickly the US media has turned on that front).
So what if he was given all those things in Toronto, does that go against him being loyal? No, it's all a factor, why do you dismiss it so easily.
Where did he bad mouth anyone? Where has he been shown to suddenly be disloyal? He's venting about being told one thing and the opposite happening and he's showing you just how much he wanted to stay here, that he didn't want to leave.
Ahhh but he did want out when he heard his buddy Lowry was being traded and team was going to tank mode.
whysoserious wrote:Local_NG_Idiot wrote:Showing loyalty includes the difficult times. DD had the opportunity to bite his tongue on a management mistep and keep his anger within his own private circle, but no, the first time he feels the team disrespects him and it's off to the races on social media.
Pop showed loyalty after Kawhi holds one of a handful of Pop's last coaching seasons hostage, acting like an infant and forcing his way out of the organization @ .25 cents on the dollar and yet Pop STILL comes out and praises Kawhi. THAT is loyalty, not what DeRozan did when times were easy on him and the franchise catered to his wishes.
But has he been disloyal or is he simply stating his views? He hasn't dissed the organization or anything. He stated he was told one thing and the opposite happens. From his perspective he was lied to in this regard (which I've posted multiple times that I don't think he was lied to because I don't believe there was intent to hide something here).
But even if we accept your premise of his reaction, is one post or series of posts an indication of his entire history and character? Or do we go by the overall body of work? Same thing applies to Masai where people are hating him for lying to Demar. His entire history shows he's a players manager and has good relationships with the players, does he seem like the type that will lie to players?

whysoserious wrote:Chandan wrote:
What is so loyal about him that he did in the public eye that other NBA players doesn't do?
For myself I tend to work backwards. I look at the result and I take an educated guess on someone's mindset.
When everything has pretty much worked out for derozan in Toronto: being the alpha dog in marke t all by himself; receiving a big contract; living in a place where he gets worshipped; super long leash didn't have to play defense. All things lead me to the conclusion that the advantage he gains being here is large enough that loyalty doesn't really need to factor into the decision.
Loyalty isn't something to boast about when things are going peachy returning to a team year after year of stumbling in the playoffs and getting another shot to prove your worth. Loyalty is when you get traded away from a situation that clearly isn't working and being understanding and not bad-mouthing your former team and crying on social media. That'd the standard I ahere to, and if he step outside he is no longer loyal IMO.
He publicly stated he wanted to be in Toronto multiple times, when things were bad he still wanted to be here. He never wanted out despite all the playoff struggles and media calling him out (how quickly the US media has turned on that front).
So what if he was given all those things in Toronto, does that go against him being loyal? No, it's all a factor, why do you dismiss it so easily.
Where did he bad mouth anyone? Where has he been shown to suddenly be disloyal? He's venting about being told one thing and the opposite happening and he's showing you just how much he wanted to stay here, that he didn't want to leave.
whysoserious wrote:Local_NG_Idiot wrote:Showing loyalty includes the difficult times. DD had the opportunity to bite his tongue on a management mistep and keep his anger within his own private circle, but no, the first time he feels the team disrespects him and it's off to the races on social media.
Pop showed loyalty after Kawhi holds one of a handful of Pop's last coaching seasons hostage, acting like an infant and forcing his way out of the organization @ .25 cents on the dollar and yet Pop STILL comes out and praises Kawhi. THAT is loyalty, not what DeRozan did when times were easy on him and the franchise catered to his wishes.
But has he been disloyal or is he simply stating his views? He hasn't dissed the organization or anything. He stated he was told one thing and the opposite happens. From his perspective he was lied to in this regard (which I've posted multiple times that I don't think he was lied to because I don't believe there was intent to hide something here).
But even if we accept your premise of his reaction, is one post or series of posts an indication of his entire history and character? Or do we go by the overall body of work? Same thing applies to Masai where people are hating him for lying to Demar. His entire history shows he's a players manager and has good relationships with the players, does he seem like the type that will lie to players?
Chandan wrote:again, what exactly is this entire history and character other than "he wants to be here" in a situation that benefits him.
I've mentioned multiple times, what he does is pretty much the norm for nba players. Talk good about the city, back a few charities, shoots videos of his workout. What exactly separates him from let's say.... Jonas Valanciuas?
Local_NG_Idiot wrote:
Has he been disloyal? Of course! He knew full well stating that view for everyone to see that the org lied to him is completely throwing the org under the bus for the great two-way relationship there has been for the past 9 seasons.
Same applies to the org. Do we judge Toronto Raps organization's treatment of DeMar on a management mistep of not telling him there's still a chance he's being traded, or do we judge the Raps on how they treated DD on their total body of work?
If you are attempting to advocate that DD remained loyal based upon the entirety of his tenure and you want to throw out his intent to tarnish the Raps org with his social media posts (yes there is 100% intent there, no doubt), then the same must apply to the org that and their treatment of DD over the entire tenure.
Man what are you talking about....we got swept last year by a team who got taken to 7 games by Boston and Indy. Boston didn't even have Irving and Hayward too. We had several kicks at the can with a DD led team. We need much more firepower to build a team with DD because he needs to be a third option with top tier talent, similar to Bosh.Hackett wrote:He is right.... this franchise smells like crap the day Casey got the boot... now Derozan. The guy that improved every year, and gave everything he had.
You guys wanted to change at any cost, good luck with your mercenary.
whysoserious wrote:Local_NG_Idiot wrote:Showing loyalty includes the difficult times. DD had the opportunity to bite his tongue on a management mistep and keep his anger within his own private circle, but no, the first time he feels the team disrespects him and it's off to the races on social media.
Pop showed loyalty after Kawhi holds one of a handful of Pop's last coaching seasons hostage, acting like an infant and forcing his way out of the organization @ .25 cents on the dollar and yet Pop STILL comes out and praises Kawhi. THAT is loyalty, not what DeRozan did when times were easy on him and the franchise catered to his wishes.
But has he been disloyal or is he simply stating his views? He hasn't dissed the organization or anything. He stated he was told one thing and the opposite happens. From his perspective he was lied to in this regard (which I've posted multiple times that I don't think he was lied to because I don't believe there was intent to hide something here).
But even if we accept your premise of his reaction, is one post or series of posts an indication of his entire history and character? Or do we go by the overall body of work? Same thing applies to Masai where people are hating him for lying to Demar. His entire history shows he's a players manager and has good relationships with the players, does he seem like the type that will lie to players?

whysoserious wrote:Omg, so when the team was tearing it down he voiced his opinion that if they were rebuilding then he should be traded too and wanted out. Wow, such strong evidence of a lack of loyalty? They weren't even that good of friends at that point, it was a reaction to the organization going in a different direction. Is that being disloyal? I don't think so. But again, why are we focusing on all this other stuff outside of the basketball reasons. We have nothing to go off on the personal side of things.
As I stated, there's enough basketball reasons to make this decision from the Raptors side of things, why focus on this and try to tear down a guy who has been an overall positive player for the city on the court and off.

HighUpNorth wrote:diamondsfinest wrote:HighUpNorth wrote:Demar didn't take a max contract....he purposely left a few million on the table for us to work with.....
this place has the worst raptor "fans"
sorry how much did Korver and JR make?
'he left a few million for us". Yeah the Raptor fans are terrible, it took 3 sweeps in 4 years for this finally to happen.
Enjoy it ****
Maybe we should of put a team around him instead of a 33 year old Lowry?
But yeah it's DD's fault.
Korver and JR are not All NBA All Stars...