ImageImage

ATL: The 2018 NFL Offseason - DeMarco Murray Retires (pg 86)

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
MikeIsGood
RealGM
Posts: 35,562
And1: 11,496
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: Vamos Rafa
     

Re: ATL: The 2018 NFL Offseason - Kam Chancellor Retires (pg 86) 

Post#1721 » by MikeIsGood » Sat Jul 14, 2018 12:25 pm

Mags FTW wrote:DeMarco Murray retires.

I think each of the past 3 years I got stuck with him as my RB2.


I think I've had him as one of my RB2s past 3 or 3 years, too.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,280
And1: 7,927
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: ATL: The 2018 NFL Offseason - Kam Chancellor Retires (pg 86) 

Post#1722 » by Mags FTW » Sat Jul 14, 2018 1:20 pm

MikeIsGood wrote:
Mags FTW wrote:DeMarco Murray retires.

I think each of the past 3 years I got stuck with him as my RB2.


I think I've had him as one of my RB2s past 3 or 3 years, too.

I always felt like there was a cycle of:

Week 1) Murray gets 10 carries for 27 yards. Duke Johnson/C.J. Anderson/etc. explodes for 20+ points.

Week 2) I pick up Johnson and start him, and he does nothing. Murray has a 100 yard 1 TD game.

Week 3) I start Murray again. Henry gets a majority of the touches.

Rinse. Repeat.
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,862
And1: 4,922
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: ATL: The 2018 NFL Offseason - DeMarco Murray Retires (pg 86) 

Post#1723 » by RRyder823 » Tue Jul 17, 2018 4:47 pm

Man Bell is the best RB in the league probably but damn if hes mor buts turning down 5 years 70 million as a 26 year old RB

Sent from my SM-G892A using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,322
And1: 11,419
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: ATL: The 2018 NFL Offseason - DeMarco Murray Retires (pg 86) 

Post#1724 » by Turk Nowitzki » Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:38 pm

Bell is probably out of his mind for turning down these offers but I respect the balls it takes. Also, it's not like he's making chump change on these franchise tags so that has to help. I'm sure he's looking for massive guaranteed money on his deal that the Steelers aren't willing to give a RB.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,517
And1: 9,847
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: ATL: The 2018 NFL Offseason - DeMarco Murray Retires (pg 86) 

Post#1725 » by M-C-G » Wed Jul 18, 2018 3:39 pm

Turk Nowitzki wrote:Bell is probably out of his mind for turning down these offers but I respect the balls it takes. Also, it's not like he's making chump change on these franchise tags so that has to help. I'm sure he's looking for massive guaranteed money on his deal that the Steelers aren't willing to give a RB.


I thought I heard only 10M was guaranteed, if that is the case, he is much better off getting on the open market after this season. Cleveland has tons of cap space.

EDIT
Oh wow, this is even worse than I thought.

On Monday, the Steelers leaked just enough of their final offer to running back Le'Veon Bell to make Bell look greedy and unreasonable. On Tuesday, enough additional information emerged about the proposed package to make the Steelers look disingenuous and delusional.

The news that the contract had only $10 million in fully-guaranteed cash means that Bell couldn’t have accepted it. And if his agent, Adisa Bakari, would have accepted it on Bell’s behalf, Bakari probably wouldn’t have been an agent for much longer.

Bell already has, in hand, a one-year contract offer that will pay him $14.5 million fully guaranteed. Why would he commit to five years with only $10 million guaranteed when he can collect nearly 50 percent more than that and get paid market value in less than eight months?

It’s still not known what the Steelers would have paid Bell in base salary this year. That payment would have been as a practical matter guaranteed, because they wouldn’t have cut him before the start of the regular season. But unless it was at least another $10 million, why would Bell have traded a bird in the hand for a different bird in the bush?

The question throughout the negotiation process was whether the Steelers would make Bell the kind of offer that prompted him to swap $14.5 million and a path to free agency. Whatever the 2018 base salary, the Steelers didn’t come close — and they surely know it.

Which requires keeping a close eye on the possibility that, come late August, the Steelers will rescind the franchise tender before Bell can accept it.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,286
And1: 7,381
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: ATL: The 2018 NFL Offseason - DeMarco Murray Retires (pg 86) 

Post#1726 » by FAH1223 » Thu Jul 19, 2018 4:00 pm

M-C-G wrote:
Turk Nowitzki wrote:Bell is probably out of his mind for turning down these offers but I respect the balls it takes. Also, it's not like he's making chump change on these franchise tags so that has to help. I'm sure he's looking for massive guaranteed money on his deal that the Steelers aren't willing to give a RB.


I thought I heard only 10M was guaranteed, if that is the case, he is much better off getting on the open market after this season. Cleveland has tons of cap space.

EDIT
Oh wow, this is even worse than I thought.

On Monday, the Steelers leaked just enough of their final offer to running back Le'Veon Bell to make Bell look greedy and unreasonable. On Tuesday, enough additional information emerged about the proposed package to make the Steelers look disingenuous and delusional.

The news that the contract had only $10 million in fully-guaranteed cash means that Bell couldn’t have accepted it. And if his agent, Adisa Bakari, would have accepted it on Bell’s behalf, Bakari probably wouldn’t have been an agent for much longer.

Bell already has, in hand, a one-year contract offer that will pay him $14.5 million fully guaranteed. Why would he commit to five years with only $10 million guaranteed when he can collect nearly 50 percent more than that and get paid market value in less than eight months?

It’s still not known what the Steelers would have paid Bell in base salary this year. That payment would have been as a practical matter guaranteed, because they wouldn’t have cut him before the start of the regular season. But unless it was at least another $10 million, why would Bell have traded a bird in the hand for a different bird in the bush?

The question throughout the negotiation process was whether the Steelers would make Bell the kind of offer that prompted him to swap $14.5 million and a path to free agency. Whatever the 2018 base salary, the Steelers didn’t come close — and they surely know it.

Which requires keeping a close eye on the possibility that, come late August, the Steelers will rescind the franchise tender before Bell can accept it.


Doubt Steelers rescind it. Sounds like a negotiating ploy.
Image
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 35,720
And1: 26,145
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: ATL: The 2018 NFL Offseason - DeMarco Murray Retires (pg 86) 

Post#1727 » by Matches Malone » Thu Jul 19, 2018 8:58 pm

Read on Twitter
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,462
And1: 4,422
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: ATL: The 2018 NFL Offseason - DeMarco Murray Retires (pg 86) 

Post#1728 » by Kerb Hohl » Thu Jul 19, 2018 9:14 pm

I hope the entire team kneels.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,462
And1: 4,422
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: ATL: The 2018 NFL Offseason - DeMarco Murray Retires (pg 86) 

Post#1729 » by Kerb Hohl » Fri Jul 20, 2018 2:43 am

Lol the policy is already suspended now.
User avatar
IrishRainbow
Veteran
Posts: 2,852
And1: 928
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Location: @ the drawing table
     

Re: RE: Re: ATL: The 2018 NFL Offseason - Kam Chancellor Retires (pg 86) 

Post#1730 » by IrishRainbow » Fri Jul 20, 2018 2:58 pm

Mags FTW wrote:
MikeIsGood wrote:
Mags FTW wrote:DeMarco Murray retires.

I think each of the past 3 years I got stuck with him as my RB2.


I think I've had him as one of my RB2s past 3 or 3 years, too.

I always felt like there was a cycle of:

Week 1) Murray gets 10 carries for 27 yards. Duke Johnson/C.J. Anderson/etc. explodes for 20+ points.

Week 2) I pick up Johnson and start him, and he does nothing. Murray has a 100 yard 1 TD game.

Week 3) I start Murray again. Henry gets a majority of the touches.

Rinse. Repeat.
I've read that book myself

Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app

Return to Green Bay Packers