Hoopzilla wrote:dice wrote:luss54321 wrote:Am I the only one who thinks Capela is overrated...?
Nearly 20 million a year for a guy who gas no offensive skills and can't even stay on the court in the 4th quarter due to his career 48% FT...? I know rebounding and rim protection are important, but in today's NBA committing 90 million to a big man who can't make a basket past 10 feet doesnt seem smart.
averaged 18 points per 36 on 65% TS. how many guys in the league can say that? any others at all?
Dwight Howard averaged 19.7 per 36 on 58% TS. That was the worst percentage from the field for him in 12 years. Dwight shot over 60% from the field two years in a row prior to this past season. They both suck at free throw shooting. They are in the same ballpark and Dwight is passed around the league like a hot potato...
Key differences:
Dwight is paid millions more, is stubborn, causes locker room issues, and loses in almost every key statistical category outside of raw points.
https://www.boxscoregeeks.com/players/compare?utf8=%E2%9C%93&player_ids%5B%5D=243&player_ids%5B%5D=1497&season=2017
I swear, the guys who are bashing this deal are basically just making noises.
If you take all the players who are in the same category, they're ALL paid over 18 million.
Clint is the most efficient. He's better than or comparable to most of them defensively. They all require being fed the ball to score. Only 4 of them rebound marginally better than him, and he beats all of them on TS%.
He's paid the least.
Capela, Clint $15.52
Jordan, DeAndre $21
Drummond, Andre $22
Kanter, Enes $17
Whiteside, Hassan $22
Gobert, Rudy $23
Adams, Steven $22.5
Towns, Karl-Anthony (rookie)
Valanciunas, Jonas $16.5
Jokic, Nikola $26
Dwight Howard $23
https://www.boxscoregeeks.com/players/compare?utf8=%E2%9C%93&player_ids%5B%5D=1264&player_ids%5B%5D=1497&player_ids%5B%5D=129&player_ids%5B%5D=506&player_ids%5B%5D=298&player_ids%5B%5D=1378&player_ids%5B%5D=1419&player_ids%5B%5D=3070&player_ids%5B%5D=1314&player_ids%5B%5D=1500&season=2017
Don't be jealous. It's not befitting.