Ruzious wrote:pancakes3 wrote:dckingsfan wrote:What did he do this time
the tl;dr is that he responded to dobro's post about the scientific method with:
1) there are biases in every scientific study, and as a doctor and a surgeon, he is able to parse out the biases.
2) he, as vetted through his medical education system, can pick apart the scientific method so as to make "both long-term, thoughfully (sic) calculated decisions and split second, on the spot decisions in the surgery room to save people's lives."
3) he is "smarter than the scientific method, and smarter than the self-righteous nerdy 'scientists' that perform those studies" because as a medically trained professional, he must know when to trust "the past" and when to evolve his decision-making to new diagnostics, procedures, and materials.
4) those darn scientists' biggest down fall is their "lack of self awareness in their sometimes entirely biased bull crap"
HOF - especially if you can add SD's original post and his Yes, a thousand times yes post. Geico commercial quality.
This might be a first...being a contributor, of sorts, maybe a provocateur would be more accurate,
of something which led to a HOF post. I guess this is what happens when I stop in for a moment
(Hi Ruz, MS, DCK, and others)
without signing in and putting my ignores into effect. I mean why would anyone with respect for
the limited all too brief time we have on earth waste time reading /anything/ from SD20.
Robust critical thinking? Significant insight? Move along. Nothing to see here.
dems tent too big. this green party democratic socialism is splitting your party. you guys are screwed in mid terms. get rid of the socialist and you have a chance...HRC might even be president if it wasn't for Jill Stein. 
