jcsunsfan wrote:bwgood77 wrote:NavLDO wrote:
Completely agree. He's young, and better than ANY PG we currently have on the roster. Haters can point to team stats, etc., with him on the floor last year, but of course, those same posters refuse to acknowledge that a) we were tanking, and b) the rest of our team was pretty bad, and c) we had a horrible HC. What would it have hurt to keep our best PG on the roster?? We wouldn't have been able to overpay Ariza by about $7M to sign him for a 1-yr deal, and actually use that towards a different better answer in FA?
So, while teams like Toronto are buying Kawhi Leonard for a song, Indiana is signing a 28YO Tyreke Evans for $3M less than what we paid for a lesser player, and other trades/signings like Boogie and Melo (and yes, Melo at $2.4M is better than Ariza at $15M)
we are signing guys that have this type of impact...
"..the team was 15-1 in games Ariza didn't play last season..."
McD's most 'inspired move' was trading for Richaun Holmes...yay. Yes, I like that move, but that is not a 'were headed to the Playoffs-level' move.
Payton was a top 10 pick by the Magic and when his RFA came up they wanted no part of it and traded him for a mid 2nd. That doesn't say much about a player. This isn't the same Magic front office that let Dipo or Harris go either. This is the one that drafted Giannis, traded for Middleton and drafted Brogdon and moved to the Magic last summer as GM. If Payton could only get $3 million in FA that certainly doesn't say a lot about what NBA GMs think of him.
There is more to the Payton story but I am not sure what it is. Maybe it has something to do with hair (where it was) maybe not. But it seems to me that there is something in his private life, habits or something that made teams not to keep him. The Suns saw him play well for about a month and then he just dropped.
Maybe he smokes A LOT or weed or something. I am just grasping at straws. In his rookie interviews, Payton claimed he had "never even tried" weed. He was also asked if he had a girlfriend, to which he said "yes." He was then asked what his "pick up line" was.
I don't know. There is something not quite right with the dude, and I just have no idea what it is. It is probably irresponsible to speculate.
Well, that's what we fans do most of the time...speculate...since we have no insider information, so I don't think it's wrong to have an opinion on the situation.
I don't think giving him 19 games on a crap team is enough to evaluate how he fits here, TBPH. Yeah, he hit a slump...10 games after he arrived here. Have we not seen this same level of inadequacy with Knight, yet with BK, it has been over and over. Chriss has had streaks of games where he's looked off; so has Bender. Warren hit a rough patch, I believe, a couple years back.
Bottom line, this team was in active Tank Mode, and Payton did nothing to turn that around, but look at the coaching decisions that were taking place at the time, as well.
And yeah, I bet EP only saw $3M this off-season; why would anyone pay him anymore after seeing what they saw? We had to PAY to get rid of Dudley, who is likely, if not already, bought out.
Alex Len wasn't re-signed as an RFA either, and signed for $4.5M, and Alex Len actually looked good last year for a good part of the season. No team is going to pay top dollar for an RFA that was not retained by their team, especially the worst team in the NBA.
Anyway, using what a player signed for in FA to determine whether he was good fit for our situation is irrelevant, IMO. In fact, NOT signing him for $3M was a bad move, if that's all it took. Ariza is NOT 5x the player EP is, and EP actually fills a need, whereas Ariza is no more than an overpaid mentor at a position of strength on our team.
So, like you were saying, this is speculation on my part, but one of three things will end up happening with Ariza:
1) He won't get very many minutes, thus, act in a 'mentor' role, as mentioned above...or, an occasional 'on-the-court' coach, if you will. That's a lot of money to spend on that role.
2) He'll play a lot, thus eating up a lot of minutes that are already going to be spread thin between Warren, JJ, and Bridges, or...
3) He'll play more at the 4, which is both not his ideal position and not promising for our young guys, Bender and Chriss, and if that's the case, we should have taken a chance on a younger talent whose actual primary position is PF. Why not, if we're on the 'Rebuild Train' again? We may as well try to figure out who's our future at a position of uncertainty, which, BTW, is NOT SF or SG, nor should it be Center, at this point, or we've made a grave error.
In any of those 3 situations, to me, that's a waste of a good $15M that could have been spent more wisely, even on a couple of one year deals on players at positions, like PG and PF, where we actually have uncertainty.