Political Roundtable Part XXI
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI
- Jamaaliver
- Forum Mod - Hawks
- Posts: 45,341
- And1: 17,230
- Joined: Sep 22, 2005
- Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
- Contact:
-
Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI
.....................................................................................................
Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI
-
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 14,799
- And1: 7,926
- Joined: Feb 25, 2009
Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI
continued here
Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 70,102
- And1: 22,528
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: Political Roundtable Part XXI
Kanyewest wrote:Trump is in trouble since his lawyer pleaded guilty and is cooperating with the authorities. It looks like Trump or his corporation will be tried for committing an illegal donation to cover up one of the Affairs he was having right before the election
Trump is in no trouble whatsoever. Calling a nondisclosure agreement a campaign contribution is beyond stupid. Mark Levin sums up the matter nicely:
A campaign expenditure under our federal campaign laws is an expenditure solely for campaign activity. A candidate who spends his own money or even corporate money for an event that occurred not as a result of the campaign, it is not a campaign expenditure. Let me give a few examples to help people understand this, especially the American people.
Let’s say a candidate had said we owe vendors a whole lot of money. We’ve had disputes with them. But I want you to go ahead and pay them. I’m a candidate, I don’t want all this negative publicity. So he says to his private lawyer, you pay them, I’ll reimburse you, get it done. Is that illegal? It’s perfectly legal.
Yet according to the prosecution of the Southern District of New York it’s paid at the direction of the candidate to influence the election. Yes, Mr. Prosecutor, how stupid is your point? It’s not a crime.
More, let’s say that this candidate settles a lawsuit that was initiated before he becomes a candidate. And he says to his personal lawyer, I want you to pay, settle that lawsuit. You can use my corporate funds, my private funds, whatever it is. That is perfectly legal, too.
The prosecutor would say, but that influenced the election. So what? There are certain things you do that influence an election that are legal and certain things you do to influence an election that are illegal.
Let’s say a candidate gets a non-disclosure agreement from a disgruntled employee, and he wants to quiet that disgruntled employee as he goes into the election. He pays the funds out of his pocket or through his corporation. Perfectly legal.
Nothing here was spent out of the campaign. Nothing was done with the campaign or to the campaign. This is exactly what the federal law is.
Mr. Lanny Davis had his client plead guilty to two offenses that aren’t offenses.