Prokorov wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:Prokorov wrote:
how did he get jobbed? he barely played the first third/half of the season and everyone who made the all rookie teams ahead of him had a clear better season.
Josh Jackson had a better season overall than Allen? On what grounds?
If a player on the Nets posted what Jackson posted with that kind of inefficiency you would not be saying this, you'd be calling him a inefficient chucker on a bad team. Jackson was a complete negative on the floor and his TS was 48%.
Jackson isnt a knock down shooter or go to scorer, he is a Kirilenko mold jack of all trades swiss army knife. and he had a horrible first couple months. second half of the year he dropped 19/6/3/2/1 with some solid defense despite being surrounded by a team of awful defenders, playing next to a real chucker in booker, and being on a team that was openly and actively tanking.
as a starter jackson was 16/5/2/1/.5 and allen was 10/6/1/.5/1
allen only really has jackson in efficiency, which is great i love that allen really stays in his lane and just goes with dunks and layups but jackson is a wing on a team of me-first chuckers. not a center on a team that shares the ball as well as anyone and is super analytics driven.
yeah if you look at raw season long numbers in a vaccuum, ignore that allen played 600 less minutes, yeah you could make a case for allen. but when you factor in those things jackson had a better year.... or at the very least allen didnt get "jobbed"
jackson is basically a better version of last years RHJ, a guy i loved and defended on here
I don't think scoring 19ppg post all star break with those kinds of advanced numbers is very flattering, but if we're going to take into account minutes and how Allen started hitting the rookie wall late in the season, I can see how you feel that way. i still say he got snubbed. i'd rather take a guy who is a net positive on the floor.























