Donald Kaufman wrote:GREY 1769 wrote:Yesterday I was a bit miffed at his two year contract not being honoured. His agent said Manu was weary of the travel but I thought well if you sign a two year deal, you think of that ahead of time. Outside of injuries, it's supposed to mean something when you commit to that. And that talk with Pop sounded more like Manu announcing his intentions rather than their discussing where his place on the team could be. It was widely reported that Manu would return if his family was ok with it and if the Spurs needed him, and the latter was a clear yes. But if a player doesn't have that desire anymore, and if he had to be talked into staying, well then it's not ideal for both sides.
Is it your money? Why do you care? He has a right to retire when he feels he can't go anymore. I think after all the years of loyal service, playing through pain, accepting a bench role etc. would be enough for most Spurs fans. Obviously not.
The premise that wages not being a fan's money therefore one can't have an opinion about how the team uses available finances is specious. This whole board is for exchange of ideas about teams they follow. It's not about what's enough or not for fans; that's not the point (although I addressed that part later as well). He knew last season would likely be his last and kept it to himself. Doing so means Spurs have $2.5M in dead cap now. We could have used it differently had it been a one year deal. Waiting until late August also affected how PATFO proceeded in filling out the roster.