XTraderXL wrote:UcanUwill wrote:Pointguard01 wrote:I’m less worried about his getting past someone. I’m more curious about him being a good shooter. He seems to have that potential. If he can become a 37%+ 3-FG shooter and make the defense play that, he’ll be special.
Jokes?
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
37% is pretty easy objective, maybe not first year, but he will be better shooter than that I expect in the future. I have no worries about his shot at all.
He is a much better shooter than his % suggest. The problem is his shot selection (too many stepbacks) and his physical fitness. If you look closely, his shooting from was much better at the beginning of the season when he was fresh and the % were higher. As the season went on, the shot was getting flatter and in the end he couldnt even hit FTs consistently anymore. He shot FTs over 90% for the first 15-20 games.
If/when he gets his body right the % will go up significantly. He will also be able to break down his defenders more often which also means less step back trees. Of course thats best case scenario. He could just as easily not be well prepared and his might be called a bust after 10 games.
I really dont know what to expect, I have mixed feelings about him...
His shooting will be fine, this is from my post from last page.

I think shooting is one of the things where I don't see (m)any "analysts/experts" being concerned about. You have some people being concerned about his athleticism, others about his defense, but not really about his shooting. It passes the eye test, it passes the "FT% correlates with 3PT%" rule. Also his 3PA during those first 60 games (30+30) and 37% 3P% was relatively very high for basically a point guard, 6.75 attempts per 36. So he was able to retain high % with high volume.
His shooting will be fine. He did state his shooting to be one of the two priorities for improvement, the other being of course athleticism. I am glad that they realize importance of having 37%+ shooting, because a player in his role can't be a star without it.














